Comparison of evidence-based therapeutic intervention between community- and hospital-based primary care clinics

H. Y. Lee, Hyeong Sik Ahn, J. A. Jang, Young-Mee Lee, H. J. Hann, M. S. Park, Duck-Sun Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of therapeutic interventions that is supported by scientific evidence between hospital-based and community-based primary care clinics. The study setting is a primary care clinic in university-affiliated tertiary hospital and community-based primary care clinic in a region in Seoul. A retrospective review of patients' medical records was done according to the primary diagnosis and treatment for 890 patients in community-based clinic and 307 in hospital-based clinic. The evidence for the intervention was searched for in Medline (1966-2001) and other evidence-based databases. The evidence was then classified as one of the three categories (i) evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs); (ii) convincing non-experimental evidence; and (iii) interventions without substantial evidence. In the hospital-based clinics, out of 356 primary diagnosis and treatment pairs, 59.6% were supported by evidence from at least one RCTs, and 19.4% were supported by convincing non-experimental evidence. In the community-based clinics, 47.1% out of 893 pairs and 10.5% fell into each category. As a result, the proportion of interventions in community settings that were based on evidence meeting our criteria was significantly lower than that of the hospital-based settings. To facilitate evidence-based practice, supportive activity should be focused on the primary care settings based on community where medical practices are less evidence-based.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)975-980
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume59
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Community Hospital
Primary Health Care
Evidence-Based Practice
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Tertiary Care Centers
Medical Records
Databases

Keywords

  • Community-based care
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Primary care
  • Randomised Controlled trials
  • Reaching hospital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of evidence-based therapeutic intervention between community- and hospital-based primary care clinics. / Lee, H. Y.; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Jang, J. A.; Lee, Young-Mee; Hann, H. J.; Park, M. S.; Ahn, Duck-Sun.

In: International Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 59, No. 8, 01.08.2005, p. 975-980.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7820d8925e494d08851a1f876571e12d,
title = "Comparison of evidence-based therapeutic intervention between community- and hospital-based primary care clinics",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of therapeutic interventions that is supported by scientific evidence between hospital-based and community-based primary care clinics. The study setting is a primary care clinic in university-affiliated tertiary hospital and community-based primary care clinic in a region in Seoul. A retrospective review of patients' medical records was done according to the primary diagnosis and treatment for 890 patients in community-based clinic and 307 in hospital-based clinic. The evidence for the intervention was searched for in Medline (1966-2001) and other evidence-based databases. The evidence was then classified as one of the three categories (i) evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs); (ii) convincing non-experimental evidence; and (iii) interventions without substantial evidence. In the hospital-based clinics, out of 356 primary diagnosis and treatment pairs, 59.6{\%} were supported by evidence from at least one RCTs, and 19.4{\%} were supported by convincing non-experimental evidence. In the community-based clinics, 47.1{\%} out of 893 pairs and 10.5{\%} fell into each category. As a result, the proportion of interventions in community settings that were based on evidence meeting our criteria was significantly lower than that of the hospital-based settings. To facilitate evidence-based practice, supportive activity should be focused on the primary care settings based on community where medical practices are less evidence-based.",
keywords = "Community-based care, Evidence-based medicine, Primary care, Randomised Controlled trials, Reaching hospital",
author = "Lee, {H. Y.} and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Jang, {J. A.} and Young-Mee Lee and Hann, {H. J.} and Park, {M. S.} and Duck-Sun Ahn",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00579.x",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "975--980",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Practice",
issn = "1368-5031",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of evidence-based therapeutic intervention between community- and hospital-based primary care clinics

AU - Lee, H. Y.

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - Jang, J. A.

AU - Lee, Young-Mee

AU - Hann, H. J.

AU - Park, M. S.

AU - Ahn, Duck-Sun

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of therapeutic interventions that is supported by scientific evidence between hospital-based and community-based primary care clinics. The study setting is a primary care clinic in university-affiliated tertiary hospital and community-based primary care clinic in a region in Seoul. A retrospective review of patients' medical records was done according to the primary diagnosis and treatment for 890 patients in community-based clinic and 307 in hospital-based clinic. The evidence for the intervention was searched for in Medline (1966-2001) and other evidence-based databases. The evidence was then classified as one of the three categories (i) evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs); (ii) convincing non-experimental evidence; and (iii) interventions without substantial evidence. In the hospital-based clinics, out of 356 primary diagnosis and treatment pairs, 59.6% were supported by evidence from at least one RCTs, and 19.4% were supported by convincing non-experimental evidence. In the community-based clinics, 47.1% out of 893 pairs and 10.5% fell into each category. As a result, the proportion of interventions in community settings that were based on evidence meeting our criteria was significantly lower than that of the hospital-based settings. To facilitate evidence-based practice, supportive activity should be focused on the primary care settings based on community where medical practices are less evidence-based.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of therapeutic interventions that is supported by scientific evidence between hospital-based and community-based primary care clinics. The study setting is a primary care clinic in university-affiliated tertiary hospital and community-based primary care clinic in a region in Seoul. A retrospective review of patients' medical records was done according to the primary diagnosis and treatment for 890 patients in community-based clinic and 307 in hospital-based clinic. The evidence for the intervention was searched for in Medline (1966-2001) and other evidence-based databases. The evidence was then classified as one of the three categories (i) evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs); (ii) convincing non-experimental evidence; and (iii) interventions without substantial evidence. In the hospital-based clinics, out of 356 primary diagnosis and treatment pairs, 59.6% were supported by evidence from at least one RCTs, and 19.4% were supported by convincing non-experimental evidence. In the community-based clinics, 47.1% out of 893 pairs and 10.5% fell into each category. As a result, the proportion of interventions in community settings that were based on evidence meeting our criteria was significantly lower than that of the hospital-based settings. To facilitate evidence-based practice, supportive activity should be focused on the primary care settings based on community where medical practices are less evidence-based.

KW - Community-based care

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Primary care

KW - Randomised Controlled trials

KW - Reaching hospital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644642257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644642257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00579.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00579.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 59

SP - 975

EP - 980

JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice

SN - 1368-5031

IS - 8

ER -