Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater

Yeongmi Jeong, Youngjin Kim, Yongxun Jin, Seungkwan Hong, Chanhyuk Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The feasibility of an anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor (AnCMBR) was investigated by comparison with a conventional anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). With regard to treatment performance, the AnCMBR achieved higher organic removal rates than the AnMBR because the ceramic membranes retained a high concentration of biomass in the reactor. Despite a high mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, the AnCMBR exhibited lower membrane fouling. To elucidate effects of sludge properties on membrane fouling in the AnCMBR and AnMBR, soluble microbial products (SMPs) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) were analyzed. The SMP and EPS concentrations in the AnCMBR were higher than in the AnMBR. This may be because some suspended solids bio-degraded and likely released protein-like SMPs in the AnCMBR. Hydrophobicity and surface charges were analyzed; the sludge in the AnCMBR was found to be more hydrophobic and less negative than in the AnMBR because protein was abundant in the AnCMBR. Despite the adverse properties of the sludge in the AnCMBR, it showed more stable filtration performance than the AnMBR. This is because the alumina-based ceramic membrane had a superhydrophilic surface and could thus mitigate membrane fouling by hydrophilic-hydrophobic repulsion. The findings from this study have significant implications for extending the application of AnCMBRs to, for example, treatment of high-strength organic waste such as food waste or livestock manure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-188
Number of pages7
JournalSeparation and Purification Technology
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jun 30

Fingerprint

Polymeric membranes
Ceramic membranes
Bioreactors
Wastewater
Membranes
Membrane fouling
Proteins
Aluminum Oxide
Manures
Surface charge
Hydrophobicity

Keywords

  • Alumina-based ceramic membrane
  • Anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor
  • Anaerobic membrane bioreactor
  • Fouling
  • PVDF polymeric membrane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater. / Jeong, Yeongmi; Kim, Youngjin; Jin, Yongxun; Hong, Seungkwan; Park, Chanhyuk.

In: Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 199, 30.06.2018, p. 182-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec7d4b281f874ce1b9be17b0670c5999,
title = "Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater",
abstract = "The feasibility of an anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor (AnCMBR) was investigated by comparison with a conventional anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). With regard to treatment performance, the AnCMBR achieved higher organic removal rates than the AnMBR because the ceramic membranes retained a high concentration of biomass in the reactor. Despite a high mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, the AnCMBR exhibited lower membrane fouling. To elucidate effects of sludge properties on membrane fouling in the AnCMBR and AnMBR, soluble microbial products (SMPs) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) were analyzed. The SMP and EPS concentrations in the AnCMBR were higher than in the AnMBR. This may be because some suspended solids bio-degraded and likely released protein-like SMPs in the AnCMBR. Hydrophobicity and surface charges were analyzed; the sludge in the AnCMBR was found to be more hydrophobic and less negative than in the AnMBR because protein was abundant in the AnCMBR. Despite the adverse properties of the sludge in the AnCMBR, it showed more stable filtration performance than the AnMBR. This is because the alumina-based ceramic membrane had a superhydrophilic surface and could thus mitigate membrane fouling by hydrophilic-hydrophobic repulsion. The findings from this study have significant implications for extending the application of AnCMBRs to, for example, treatment of high-strength organic waste such as food waste or livestock manure.",
keywords = "Alumina-based ceramic membrane, Anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor, Anaerobic membrane bioreactor, Fouling, PVDF polymeric membrane",
author = "Yeongmi Jeong and Youngjin Kim and Yongxun Jin and Seungkwan Hong and Chanhyuk Park",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.057",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "182--188",
journal = "Separation and Purification Technology",
issn = "1383-5866",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater

AU - Jeong, Yeongmi

AU - Kim, Youngjin

AU - Jin, Yongxun

AU - Hong, Seungkwan

AU - Park, Chanhyuk

PY - 2018/6/30

Y1 - 2018/6/30

N2 - The feasibility of an anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor (AnCMBR) was investigated by comparison with a conventional anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). With regard to treatment performance, the AnCMBR achieved higher organic removal rates than the AnMBR because the ceramic membranes retained a high concentration of biomass in the reactor. Despite a high mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, the AnCMBR exhibited lower membrane fouling. To elucidate effects of sludge properties on membrane fouling in the AnCMBR and AnMBR, soluble microbial products (SMPs) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) were analyzed. The SMP and EPS concentrations in the AnCMBR were higher than in the AnMBR. This may be because some suspended solids bio-degraded and likely released protein-like SMPs in the AnCMBR. Hydrophobicity and surface charges were analyzed; the sludge in the AnCMBR was found to be more hydrophobic and less negative than in the AnMBR because protein was abundant in the AnCMBR. Despite the adverse properties of the sludge in the AnCMBR, it showed more stable filtration performance than the AnMBR. This is because the alumina-based ceramic membrane had a superhydrophilic surface and could thus mitigate membrane fouling by hydrophilic-hydrophobic repulsion. The findings from this study have significant implications for extending the application of AnCMBRs to, for example, treatment of high-strength organic waste such as food waste or livestock manure.

AB - The feasibility of an anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor (AnCMBR) was investigated by comparison with a conventional anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). With regard to treatment performance, the AnCMBR achieved higher organic removal rates than the AnMBR because the ceramic membranes retained a high concentration of biomass in the reactor. Despite a high mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration, the AnCMBR exhibited lower membrane fouling. To elucidate effects of sludge properties on membrane fouling in the AnCMBR and AnMBR, soluble microbial products (SMPs) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) were analyzed. The SMP and EPS concentrations in the AnCMBR were higher than in the AnMBR. This may be because some suspended solids bio-degraded and likely released protein-like SMPs in the AnCMBR. Hydrophobicity and surface charges were analyzed; the sludge in the AnCMBR was found to be more hydrophobic and less negative than in the AnMBR because protein was abundant in the AnCMBR. Despite the adverse properties of the sludge in the AnCMBR, it showed more stable filtration performance than the AnMBR. This is because the alumina-based ceramic membrane had a superhydrophilic surface and could thus mitigate membrane fouling by hydrophilic-hydrophobic repulsion. The findings from this study have significant implications for extending the application of AnCMBRs to, for example, treatment of high-strength organic waste such as food waste or livestock manure.

KW - Alumina-based ceramic membrane

KW - Anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor

KW - Anaerobic membrane bioreactor

KW - Fouling

KW - PVDF polymeric membrane

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041477666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041477666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.057

DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.057

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041477666

VL - 199

SP - 182

EP - 188

JO - Separation and Purification Technology

JF - Separation and Purification Technology

SN - 1383-5866

ER -