Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO)

Sangyoup Lee, Chanhee Boo, Menachem Elimelech, Seungkwan Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

427 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fouling behaviors during forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) are compared. Alginate, humic acid, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) are used as model organic foulants, and two suspensions of silica colloids of different sizes are chosen as model particulate foulants. To allow meaningful comparison of fouling behavior, identical hydrodynamic operating conditions (i.e., initial permeate flux and cross-flow velocity) and feed water chemistries (i.e., pH, ionic strength, and calcium concentration) are employed during FO and RO fouling runs. The observed flux-decline behavior in FO changed dramatically with the type of organic foulant, size of colloidal foulant, and the type of the draw solution employed to generate the osmotic driving force. Based on these experimental data and the systematic comparisons of fouling behaviors of FO and RO, we provide new insights into the mechanisms governing FO fouling. In FO, reverse diffusion of salt from the draw solution to the feed side exacerbates the cake-enhanced osmotic pressure within the fouling layer. The elevated osmotic pressure near the membrane surface on the feed side leads to a substantial drop in the net osmotic driving force and, thus, significant decline of permeate flux. Our results further suggest that the structure (i.e., thickness and compactness) of the fouling layers of FO and RO is quite different. By varying the cross-flow velocity during the organic fouling runs, we were able to examine the fouling reversibility in FO and RO. The permeate flux during organic fouling in FO recovered almost completely with increasing cross-flow velocity, while no noticeable change was observed for the RO system. Our results suggest that organic fouling in FO could be controlled effectively by optimizing the hydrodynamics in the feed stream without employing chemical cleaning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-39
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Membrane Science
Volume365
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Osmosis
reverse osmosis
fouling
osmosis
Reverse osmosis
Fouling
cross flow
Flow velocity
Fluxes
flow velocity
Hydrodynamics
Osmotic Pressure
hydrodynamics
chemical cleaning
Chemical cleaning
Humic Substances
Alginate
Colloids
void ratio
Bovine Serum Albumin

Keywords

  • Cake-enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP)
  • Forward osmosis
  • Fouling reversibility
  • Reverse osmosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). / Lee, Sangyoup; Boo, Chanhee; Elimelech, Menachem; Hong, Seungkwan.

In: Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 365, No. 1-2, 01.12.2010, p. 34-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Sangyoup ; Boo, Chanhee ; Elimelech, Menachem ; Hong, Seungkwan. / Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). In: Journal of Membrane Science. 2010 ; Vol. 365, No. 1-2. pp. 34-39.
@article{f30e55f2dd3a485a81daa8840ef0a3d4,
title = "Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO)",
abstract = "Fouling behaviors during forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) are compared. Alginate, humic acid, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) are used as model organic foulants, and two suspensions of silica colloids of different sizes are chosen as model particulate foulants. To allow meaningful comparison of fouling behavior, identical hydrodynamic operating conditions (i.e., initial permeate flux and cross-flow velocity) and feed water chemistries (i.e., pH, ionic strength, and calcium concentration) are employed during FO and RO fouling runs. The observed flux-decline behavior in FO changed dramatically with the type of organic foulant, size of colloidal foulant, and the type of the draw solution employed to generate the osmotic driving force. Based on these experimental data and the systematic comparisons of fouling behaviors of FO and RO, we provide new insights into the mechanisms governing FO fouling. In FO, reverse diffusion of salt from the draw solution to the feed side exacerbates the cake-enhanced osmotic pressure within the fouling layer. The elevated osmotic pressure near the membrane surface on the feed side leads to a substantial drop in the net osmotic driving force and, thus, significant decline of permeate flux. Our results further suggest that the structure (i.e., thickness and compactness) of the fouling layers of FO and RO is quite different. By varying the cross-flow velocity during the organic fouling runs, we were able to examine the fouling reversibility in FO and RO. The permeate flux during organic fouling in FO recovered almost completely with increasing cross-flow velocity, while no noticeable change was observed for the RO system. Our results suggest that organic fouling in FO could be controlled effectively by optimizing the hydrodynamics in the feed stream without employing chemical cleaning.",
keywords = "Cake-enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP), Forward osmosis, Fouling reversibility, Reverse osmosis",
author = "Sangyoup Lee and Chanhee Boo and Menachem Elimelech and Seungkwan Hong",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036",
language = "English",
volume = "365",
pages = "34--39",
journal = "Jornal of Membrane Science",
issn = "0376-7388",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO)

AU - Lee, Sangyoup

AU - Boo, Chanhee

AU - Elimelech, Menachem

AU - Hong, Seungkwan

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Fouling behaviors during forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) are compared. Alginate, humic acid, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) are used as model organic foulants, and two suspensions of silica colloids of different sizes are chosen as model particulate foulants. To allow meaningful comparison of fouling behavior, identical hydrodynamic operating conditions (i.e., initial permeate flux and cross-flow velocity) and feed water chemistries (i.e., pH, ionic strength, and calcium concentration) are employed during FO and RO fouling runs. The observed flux-decline behavior in FO changed dramatically with the type of organic foulant, size of colloidal foulant, and the type of the draw solution employed to generate the osmotic driving force. Based on these experimental data and the systematic comparisons of fouling behaviors of FO and RO, we provide new insights into the mechanisms governing FO fouling. In FO, reverse diffusion of salt from the draw solution to the feed side exacerbates the cake-enhanced osmotic pressure within the fouling layer. The elevated osmotic pressure near the membrane surface on the feed side leads to a substantial drop in the net osmotic driving force and, thus, significant decline of permeate flux. Our results further suggest that the structure (i.e., thickness and compactness) of the fouling layers of FO and RO is quite different. By varying the cross-flow velocity during the organic fouling runs, we were able to examine the fouling reversibility in FO and RO. The permeate flux during organic fouling in FO recovered almost completely with increasing cross-flow velocity, while no noticeable change was observed for the RO system. Our results suggest that organic fouling in FO could be controlled effectively by optimizing the hydrodynamics in the feed stream without employing chemical cleaning.

AB - Fouling behaviors during forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) are compared. Alginate, humic acid, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) are used as model organic foulants, and two suspensions of silica colloids of different sizes are chosen as model particulate foulants. To allow meaningful comparison of fouling behavior, identical hydrodynamic operating conditions (i.e., initial permeate flux and cross-flow velocity) and feed water chemistries (i.e., pH, ionic strength, and calcium concentration) are employed during FO and RO fouling runs. The observed flux-decline behavior in FO changed dramatically with the type of organic foulant, size of colloidal foulant, and the type of the draw solution employed to generate the osmotic driving force. Based on these experimental data and the systematic comparisons of fouling behaviors of FO and RO, we provide new insights into the mechanisms governing FO fouling. In FO, reverse diffusion of salt from the draw solution to the feed side exacerbates the cake-enhanced osmotic pressure within the fouling layer. The elevated osmotic pressure near the membrane surface on the feed side leads to a substantial drop in the net osmotic driving force and, thus, significant decline of permeate flux. Our results further suggest that the structure (i.e., thickness and compactness) of the fouling layers of FO and RO is quite different. By varying the cross-flow velocity during the organic fouling runs, we were able to examine the fouling reversibility in FO and RO. The permeate flux during organic fouling in FO recovered almost completely with increasing cross-flow velocity, while no noticeable change was observed for the RO system. Our results suggest that organic fouling in FO could be controlled effectively by optimizing the hydrodynamics in the feed stream without employing chemical cleaning.

KW - Cake-enhanced osmotic pressure (CEOP)

KW - Forward osmosis

KW - Fouling reversibility

KW - Reverse osmosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049293209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049293209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036

DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78049293209

VL - 365

SP - 34

EP - 39

JO - Jornal of Membrane Science

JF - Jornal of Membrane Science

SN - 0376-7388

IS - 1-2

ER -