Comparison of GCM precipitation predictions with their RMSEs and pattern correlation coefficients

Chulsang Yoo, Eunsaem Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated 20 general circulation models (GCMs) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5), which provide the prediction results for the period of 2006 to 2014, the period from which the observation data (the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) data) are available. Both the GCM predictions of precipitation and the GPCP data were compared for three data structures-the global, zonal, and grid mean-with conventional statistics like the root mean square error (RMSE) and the pattern correlation coefficient of the cyclostationary empirical orthogonal functions (CSEOFs). As a result, it was possible to select a GCM which showed the best performance among the 20 GCMs considered in this study. Overall, the NorSM1-M model was found to be the most similar to the GPCP data. Additionally, the IPSL-CM5A-LR, BCC-CSM, and GFDL-CMS models were also found to be quite similar to the GPCP data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number28
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 2

Fingerprint

Meteorology
General Circulation Models
precipitation (climatology)
general circulation model
Precipitation (meteorology)
Climatology
prediction
statistics
Orthogonal functions
Observation
comparison
climatology
Mean square error
Data structures
Statistics
project

Keywords

  • GCM precipitation
  • NRMSE
  • Pattern correlation
  • Performance evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Aquatic Science
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Comparison of GCM precipitation predictions with their RMSEs and pattern correlation coefficients. / Yoo, Chulsang; Cho, Eunsaem.

In: Water (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 1, 28, 02.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb5ab847abcc4ed8a7d955df192249f3,
title = "Comparison of GCM precipitation predictions with their RMSEs and pattern correlation coefficients",
abstract = "This study evaluated 20 general circulation models (GCMs) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5), which provide the prediction results for the period of 2006 to 2014, the period from which the observation data (the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) data) are available. Both the GCM predictions of precipitation and the GPCP data were compared for three data structures-the global, zonal, and grid mean-with conventional statistics like the root mean square error (RMSE) and the pattern correlation coefficient of the cyclostationary empirical orthogonal functions (CSEOFs). As a result, it was possible to select a GCM which showed the best performance among the 20 GCMs considered in this study. Overall, the NorSM1-M model was found to be the most similar to the GPCP data. Additionally, the IPSL-CM5A-LR, BCC-CSM, and GFDL-CMS models were also found to be quite similar to the GPCP data.",
keywords = "GCM precipitation, NRMSE, Pattern correlation, Performance evaluation",
author = "Chulsang Yoo and Eunsaem Cho",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3390/w10010028",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Water (Switzerland)",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of GCM precipitation predictions with their RMSEs and pattern correlation coefficients

AU - Yoo, Chulsang

AU - Cho, Eunsaem

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - This study evaluated 20 general circulation models (GCMs) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5), which provide the prediction results for the period of 2006 to 2014, the period from which the observation data (the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) data) are available. Both the GCM predictions of precipitation and the GPCP data were compared for three data structures-the global, zonal, and grid mean-with conventional statistics like the root mean square error (RMSE) and the pattern correlation coefficient of the cyclostationary empirical orthogonal functions (CSEOFs). As a result, it was possible to select a GCM which showed the best performance among the 20 GCMs considered in this study. Overall, the NorSM1-M model was found to be the most similar to the GPCP data. Additionally, the IPSL-CM5A-LR, BCC-CSM, and GFDL-CMS models were also found to be quite similar to the GPCP data.

AB - This study evaluated 20 general circulation models (GCMs) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 5 (CMIP5), which provide the prediction results for the period of 2006 to 2014, the period from which the observation data (the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) data) are available. Both the GCM predictions of precipitation and the GPCP data were compared for three data structures-the global, zonal, and grid mean-with conventional statistics like the root mean square error (RMSE) and the pattern correlation coefficient of the cyclostationary empirical orthogonal functions (CSEOFs). As a result, it was possible to select a GCM which showed the best performance among the 20 GCMs considered in this study. Overall, the NorSM1-M model was found to be the most similar to the GPCP data. Additionally, the IPSL-CM5A-LR, BCC-CSM, and GFDL-CMS models were also found to be quite similar to the GPCP data.

KW - GCM precipitation

KW - NRMSE

KW - Pattern correlation

KW - Performance evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039967971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039967971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/w10010028

DO - 10.3390/w10010028

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Water (Switzerland)

JF - Water (Switzerland)

SN - 2073-4441

IS - 1

M1 - 28

ER -