Comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars

Jin Uk Jang, Soo Young Kim, Eul Sik Yoon, Woo-Kyung Kim, Seung Ha Park, Byung-Il Lee, Deok-Woo Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). Methods Between February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale. Results The mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred. Conclusions Both types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-581
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Plastic Surgery
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Thyroidectomy
Cicatrix
Lasers
Therapeutics
Hypertrophic Cicatrix
Laser Therapy
Patient Satisfaction
Human Body
Medical Records
Neck
Color

Keywords

  • Cicatrix
  • Laser therapy
  • Thyroidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars. / Jang, Jin Uk; Kim, Soo Young; Yoon, Eul Sik; Kim, Woo-Kyung; Park, Seung Ha; Lee, Byung-Il; Kim, Deok-Woo.

In: Archives of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 575-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61d5f44c860145d4a61c08b8156227b2,
title = "Comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars",
abstract = "Background Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). Methods Between February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale. Results The mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred. Conclusions Both types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.",
keywords = "Cicatrix, Laser therapy, Thyroidectomy",
author = "Jang, {Jin Uk} and Kim, {Soo Young} and Yoon, {Eul Sik} and Woo-Kyung Kim and Park, {Seung Ha} and Byung-Il Lee and Deok-Woo Kim",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "575--581",
journal = "Archives of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2234-6163",
publisher = "Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars

AU - Jang, Jin Uk

AU - Kim, Soo Young

AU - Yoon, Eul Sik

AU - Kim, Woo-Kyung

AU - Park, Seung Ha

AU - Lee, Byung-Il

AU - Kim, Deok-Woo

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Background Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). Methods Between February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale. Results The mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred. Conclusions Both types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.

AB - Background Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). Methods Between February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale. Results The mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred. Conclusions Both types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics.

KW - Cicatrix

KW - Laser therapy

KW - Thyroidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996865905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996865905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575

DO - 10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84996865905

VL - 43

SP - 575

EP - 581

JO - Archives of Plastic Surgery

JF - Archives of Plastic Surgery

SN - 2234-6163

IS - 6

ER -