Comparison of the long-term clinical results of hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)


This study was performed to compare the incidence of posterior capsular opacity (PCO) and refractive errors between hydrophilic (ACR6D, Corneal) and hydrophobic (MA60BM, AcrySof) acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) over a 3-year follow-up after phacoemulsification surgery. The patients with AcrySof implanted in one eye and Corneal in the other eye were categorized as Group 1 (n=28), while those with one or both eyes implanted with IOLs of the same kind were categorized as Group 2 (AcrySof, n=90; Corneal, n=95). Refractive errors were evaluated at 3 months and 3 years postoperatively. The incidence of visually significant PCO was investigated 3 years postoperatively. Postoperative refractive values at 3 months were not significantly different between the two groups. However, refractive values at 3 years were significantly different between two IOLs in both groups [AcrySof -0.37+/-0.43D, Corneal -0.62+/-0.58D in Group 1 (p=0.04); AcrySof -0.38+/-0.52, Corneal -0.68+/-0.54 in Group 2 (p<0.01)]. The incidence of visually significant PCO was 14% and 32% in Group 1, and 13% and 28% in Group 2, for the AcrySof and Corneal implants, respectively. The incidence of visually significant PCO of hydrophilic acrylic IOLs was higher than that of hydrophobic acrylic IOLs in the 3-year follow-up. The postoperative 3-year refractive value of Corneal showed myopic shift.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-33
Number of pages5
JournalKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Jan 1


Cite this