Abstract
Objective: To validate the efficacy of Seeplex HPV4A ACE for the detection of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 genotypes as compared to the PCR method and the Cervista HPV assays in cervical swab samples. Methods: Besides liquid-based cytology, additional 97 cervical swab samples were collected for HPV genotyping by HPV4A ACE, Cervista HPV assays, and PCR method. To check the statistical differences, we also conducted the paired proportion test, Cohen' s κ statistic, and a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV HR showed substantial agreement with PCR for detection of HR HPVs (88.3%, κ=0.767 and 81.7%, κ=0.636, respectively). Seeplex HPV4A ACE also showed substantial agreement with the Cervista HPV 16/18 test (89.5%, κ=0.628). Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of Seeplex HPV4A ACE and Cervista HPV HR were 91.4% vs. 84.5% and 73.4%, vs. 72.7%, respectively, when those higher than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were regarded as abnormalities. HPV genotyping for HPV 16/18 detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) better than HR HPV tests (66.7% vs. 24.6% by HPV4A ACE, 52.6% vs. 25.9% by Cervista HPV assays in CIN II or more, relatively). Conclusion: Seeplex HPV4A ACE is an effective method as the PCR and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HR HPVs and for genotyping of HPV 16 and 18.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-10 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Gynecologic Oncology |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 Mar 5 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Cervista HPV 16/18
- Cervista HPV HR
- High-risk HPV
- HPV 16
- HPV 18
- Seeplex HPV4A ACE
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Oncology
Cite this
Comparison of the Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HPV in hybrid capture 2 positive media. / Min, Kyung Jin; So, Kyeong A.; Lee, Jieun; Hong, Hye Ri; Hong, Jin-Hwa; Lee, Jae Kwan; Kim, Aeree.
In: Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 05.03.2012, p. 5-10.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HPV in hybrid capture 2 positive media
AU - Min, Kyung Jin
AU - So, Kyeong A.
AU - Lee, Jieun
AU - Hong, Hye Ri
AU - Hong, Jin-Hwa
AU - Lee, Jae Kwan
AU - Kim, Aeree
PY - 2012/3/5
Y1 - 2012/3/5
N2 - Objective: To validate the efficacy of Seeplex HPV4A ACE for the detection of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 genotypes as compared to the PCR method and the Cervista HPV assays in cervical swab samples. Methods: Besides liquid-based cytology, additional 97 cervical swab samples were collected for HPV genotyping by HPV4A ACE, Cervista HPV assays, and PCR method. To check the statistical differences, we also conducted the paired proportion test, Cohen' s κ statistic, and a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV HR showed substantial agreement with PCR for detection of HR HPVs (88.3%, κ=0.767 and 81.7%, κ=0.636, respectively). Seeplex HPV4A ACE also showed substantial agreement with the Cervista HPV 16/18 test (89.5%, κ=0.628). Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of Seeplex HPV4A ACE and Cervista HPV HR were 91.4% vs. 84.5% and 73.4%, vs. 72.7%, respectively, when those higher than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were regarded as abnormalities. HPV genotyping for HPV 16/18 detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) better than HR HPV tests (66.7% vs. 24.6% by HPV4A ACE, 52.6% vs. 25.9% by Cervista HPV assays in CIN II or more, relatively). Conclusion: Seeplex HPV4A ACE is an effective method as the PCR and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HR HPVs and for genotyping of HPV 16 and 18.
AB - Objective: To validate the efficacy of Seeplex HPV4A ACE for the detection of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 genotypes as compared to the PCR method and the Cervista HPV assays in cervical swab samples. Methods: Besides liquid-based cytology, additional 97 cervical swab samples were collected for HPV genotyping by HPV4A ACE, Cervista HPV assays, and PCR method. To check the statistical differences, we also conducted the paired proportion test, Cohen' s κ statistic, and a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Seeplex HPV4A ACE and the Cervista HPV HR showed substantial agreement with PCR for detection of HR HPVs (88.3%, κ=0.767 and 81.7%, κ=0.636, respectively). Seeplex HPV4A ACE also showed substantial agreement with the Cervista HPV 16/18 test (89.5%, κ=0.628). Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of Seeplex HPV4A ACE and Cervista HPV HR were 91.4% vs. 84.5% and 73.4%, vs. 72.7%, respectively, when those higher than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were regarded as abnormalities. HPV genotyping for HPV 16/18 detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) better than HR HPV tests (66.7% vs. 24.6% by HPV4A ACE, 52.6% vs. 25.9% by Cervista HPV assays in CIN II or more, relatively). Conclusion: Seeplex HPV4A ACE is an effective method as the PCR and the Cervista HPV assays for the detection of HR HPVs and for genotyping of HPV 16 and 18.
KW - Cervista HPV 16/18
KW - Cervista HPV HR
KW - High-risk HPV
KW - HPV 16
KW - HPV 18
KW - Seeplex HPV4A ACE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863263730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863263730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.1.5
DO - 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.1.5
M3 - Article
VL - 23
SP - 5
EP - 10
JO - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
SN - 2005-0380
IS - 1
ER -