Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option?

Yoon-Jung Boo, Yoon Lee, Ji Sung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULA) is a single incision technique that exteriorizes the appendix through the umbilicus. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of TULA with SILA in pediatric appendicitis. Methods A retrospective review of medical records between April 2011 and April 2015 identified 250 pediatric patients who underwent single incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Of these, 137 patients underwent TULA and 113 patients underwent SILA. Measured outcomes included patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, operative time, length of stay, pain, and postoperative complications. Results TULA group had a shorter operative time than SILA group (28.93 vs. 49.19 min, p < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesics was more frequent in the SILA group (six cases (6.5%) vs. 19 cases (23.4%), p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the two groups. However, TULA was associated with a lower complication rate (2/137, 1.5%) than SILA (11/113, 9.8%) (p = 0.0035). In multiple logistic regression analysis, TULA was significantly associated with a lower complication rate (p = 0.049). Conclusions TULA is preferable to SILA for treating pediatric acute appendicitis because it is technically easier, results in better surgical outcomes, and provides the same excellent cosmetic results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1288-1291
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume51
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Appendicitis
Pediatrics
Operative Time
Cosmetics
Umbilicus
Medical Records
Analgesics
Length of Stay
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Demography
Pain

Keywords

  • Appendectomy
  • Children
  • Laparoscopy
  • Single-port access
  • Transumbilical surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children : which is the better surgical option? / Boo, Yoon-Jung; Lee, Yoon; Lee, Ji Sung.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 51, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 1288-1291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{820e6280422048cfadac48706a69ea2c,
title = "Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option?",
abstract = "Background Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULA) is a single incision technique that exteriorizes the appendix through the umbilicus. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of TULA with SILA in pediatric appendicitis. Methods A retrospective review of medical records between April 2011 and April 2015 identified 250 pediatric patients who underwent single incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Of these, 137 patients underwent TULA and 113 patients underwent SILA. Measured outcomes included patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, operative time, length of stay, pain, and postoperative complications. Results TULA group had a shorter operative time than SILA group (28.93 vs. 49.19 min, p < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesics was more frequent in the SILA group (six cases (6.5{\%}) vs. 19 cases (23.4{\%}), p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the two groups. However, TULA was associated with a lower complication rate (2/137, 1.5{\%}) than SILA (11/113, 9.8{\%}) (p = 0.0035). In multiple logistic regression analysis, TULA was significantly associated with a lower complication rate (p = 0.049). Conclusions TULA is preferable to SILA for treating pediatric acute appendicitis because it is technically easier, results in better surgical outcomes, and provides the same excellent cosmetic results.",
keywords = "Appendectomy, Children, Laparoscopy, Single-port access, Transumbilical surgery",
author = "Yoon-Jung Boo and Yoon Lee and Lee, {Ji Sung}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.013",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1288--1291",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children

T2 - which is the better surgical option?

AU - Boo, Yoon-Jung

AU - Lee, Yoon

AU - Lee, Ji Sung

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULA) is a single incision technique that exteriorizes the appendix through the umbilicus. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of TULA with SILA in pediatric appendicitis. Methods A retrospective review of medical records between April 2011 and April 2015 identified 250 pediatric patients who underwent single incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Of these, 137 patients underwent TULA and 113 patients underwent SILA. Measured outcomes included patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, operative time, length of stay, pain, and postoperative complications. Results TULA group had a shorter operative time than SILA group (28.93 vs. 49.19 min, p < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesics was more frequent in the SILA group (six cases (6.5%) vs. 19 cases (23.4%), p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the two groups. However, TULA was associated with a lower complication rate (2/137, 1.5%) than SILA (11/113, 9.8%) (p = 0.0035). In multiple logistic regression analysis, TULA was significantly associated with a lower complication rate (p = 0.049). Conclusions TULA is preferable to SILA for treating pediatric acute appendicitis because it is technically easier, results in better surgical outcomes, and provides the same excellent cosmetic results.

AB - Background Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULA) is a single incision technique that exteriorizes the appendix through the umbilicus. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of TULA with SILA in pediatric appendicitis. Methods A retrospective review of medical records between April 2011 and April 2015 identified 250 pediatric patients who underwent single incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Of these, 137 patients underwent TULA and 113 patients underwent SILA. Measured outcomes included patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, operative time, length of stay, pain, and postoperative complications. Results TULA group had a shorter operative time than SILA group (28.93 vs. 49.19 min, p < 0.001). The use of rescue analgesics was more frequent in the SILA group (six cases (6.5%) vs. 19 cases (23.4%), p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the two groups. However, TULA was associated with a lower complication rate (2/137, 1.5%) than SILA (11/113, 9.8%) (p = 0.0035). In multiple logistic regression analysis, TULA was significantly associated with a lower complication rate (p = 0.049). Conclusions TULA is preferable to SILA for treating pediatric acute appendicitis because it is technically easier, results in better surgical outcomes, and provides the same excellent cosmetic results.

KW - Appendectomy

KW - Children

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Single-port access

KW - Transumbilical surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956696570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956696570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 26850910

AN - SCOPUS:84956696570

VL - 51

SP - 1288

EP - 1291

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 8

ER -