Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer

Gayoung Choi, Ok Hee Woo, Hye Seon Shin, Seonah Jang, Kyu Ran Cho, Bo Kyoung Seo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 2DSM and FFDM for evaluation of breast cancer. Materials and methods A retrospective observer performance study was done by 3 breast radiologists. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and detailed lesion characterization of each 2DSM and FFDM were evaluated blindly to determine superior modality. Results The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between two modalities. The image quality was superior in 2DSM (p-value 0.0362). Conclusions 2DSM showed equivalent diagnostic accuracy and superior image quality to FFDM. Overall characterization of the lesion was better in 2DSM, and 2DSM showed superiority in evaluation of spiculated margins.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-174
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 May 1

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Breast
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer. / Choi, Gayoung; Woo, Ok Hee; Shin, Hye Seon; Jang, Seonah; Cho, Kyu Ran; Seo, Bo Kyoung.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 43, 01.05.2017, p. 170-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7faf231513c499c8cf0265678456eda,
title = "Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer",
abstract = "Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 2DSM and FFDM for evaluation of breast cancer. Materials and methods A retrospective observer performance study was done by 3 breast radiologists. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and detailed lesion characterization of each 2DSM and FFDM were evaluated blindly to determine superior modality. Results The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between two modalities. The image quality was superior in 2DSM (p-value 0.0362). Conclusions 2DSM showed equivalent diagnostic accuracy and superior image quality to FFDM. Overall characterization of the lesion was better in 2DSM, and 2DSM showed superiority in evaluation of spiculated margins.",
author = "Gayoung Choi and Woo, {Ok Hee} and Shin, {Hye Seon} and Seonah Jang and Cho, {Kyu Ran} and Seo, {Bo Kyoung}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.03.004",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "170--174",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammogram (2DSM) and conventional full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) for evaluation of breast cancer

AU - Choi, Gayoung

AU - Woo, Ok Hee

AU - Shin, Hye Seon

AU - Jang, Seonah

AU - Cho, Kyu Ran

AU - Seo, Bo Kyoung

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 2DSM and FFDM for evaluation of breast cancer. Materials and methods A retrospective observer performance study was done by 3 breast radiologists. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and detailed lesion characterization of each 2DSM and FFDM were evaluated blindly to determine superior modality. Results The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between two modalities. The image quality was superior in 2DSM (p-value 0.0362). Conclusions 2DSM showed equivalent diagnostic accuracy and superior image quality to FFDM. Overall characterization of the lesion was better in 2DSM, and 2DSM showed superiority in evaluation of spiculated margins.

AB - Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 2DSM and FFDM for evaluation of breast cancer. Materials and methods A retrospective observer performance study was done by 3 breast radiologists. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and detailed lesion characterization of each 2DSM and FFDM were evaluated blindly to determine superior modality. Results The diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between two modalities. The image quality was superior in 2DSM (p-value 0.0362). Conclusions 2DSM showed equivalent diagnostic accuracy and superior image quality to FFDM. Overall characterization of the lesion was better in 2DSM, and 2DSM showed superiority in evaluation of spiculated margins.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015776240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015776240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.03.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28334617

AN - SCOPUS:85015776240

VL - 43

SP - 170

EP - 174

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

ER -