Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand

Younggyu Son, Jihoon Cha, Myunghee Lim, Muthpandian Ashokkumar, Jeehyeong Khim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of ultrasound on the conventional mechanical soil-washing process was investigated. To determine the optimal frequency for maximum efficiency, tests were conducted with aluminum foils under four frequencies including 35, 72, 110, and 170 kHz. It is known that the physical effects generated during acoustic cavitation damage the foil by causing pits and holes. The sonication at 35 kHz resulted in maximum damage to the aluminum foil as compared to that observed at other frequencies. Based on these results, 35 kHz was selected for the ultrasonic soil-washing processes in this study. The optimal washing time was found to be 1 min, because there was no significant increase in the removal efficiency over 1 min for the three processes, mechanical, ultrasonic, and combined ultrasonicmechanical. It was also found that the combined process enhanced the performance of the soil-washing process significantly as compared to other two processes in terms of (i) diesel removal efficiency, (ii) process time, (iii) consumption of electric energy, and (iv) production of washing leachate. The efficiency of washing under ultrasonic processing conditions was similar to that observed with mechanical washing in the presence of small amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), suggesting that the ultrasonic washing process does not require external chemicals and can be considered as a "green" process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2400-2407
Number of pages8
JournalIndustrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Feb 16

Fingerprint

Washing
Sand
Ultrasonics
Soils
Aluminum foil
Sonication
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Cavitation
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate
Metal foil
Acoustics
Processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand. / Son, Younggyu; Cha, Jihoon; Lim, Myunghee; Ashokkumar, Muthpandian; Khim, Jeehyeong.

In: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 50, No. 4, 16.02.2011, p. 2400-2407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Son, Younggyu ; Cha, Jihoon ; Lim, Myunghee ; Ashokkumar, Muthpandian ; Khim, Jeehyeong. / Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand. In: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2011 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 2400-2407.
@article{386e012c789e4637a7d411f496cba6ea,
title = "Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand",
abstract = "The effect of ultrasound on the conventional mechanical soil-washing process was investigated. To determine the optimal frequency for maximum efficiency, tests were conducted with aluminum foils under four frequencies including 35, 72, 110, and 170 kHz. It is known that the physical effects generated during acoustic cavitation damage the foil by causing pits and holes. The sonication at 35 kHz resulted in maximum damage to the aluminum foil as compared to that observed at other frequencies. Based on these results, 35 kHz was selected for the ultrasonic soil-washing processes in this study. The optimal washing time was found to be 1 min, because there was no significant increase in the removal efficiency over 1 min for the three processes, mechanical, ultrasonic, and combined ultrasonicmechanical. It was also found that the combined process enhanced the performance of the soil-washing process significantly as compared to other two processes in terms of (i) diesel removal efficiency, (ii) process time, (iii) consumption of electric energy, and (iv) production of washing leachate. The efficiency of washing under ultrasonic processing conditions was similar to that observed with mechanical washing in the presence of small amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), suggesting that the ultrasonic washing process does not require external chemicals and can be considered as a {"}green{"} process.",
author = "Younggyu Son and Jihoon Cha and Myunghee Lim and Muthpandian Ashokkumar and Jeehyeong Khim",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1021/ie1016688",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "2400--2407",
journal = "Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research",
issn = "0888-5885",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand

AU - Son, Younggyu

AU - Cha, Jihoon

AU - Lim, Myunghee

AU - Ashokkumar, Muthpandian

AU - Khim, Jeehyeong

PY - 2011/2/16

Y1 - 2011/2/16

N2 - The effect of ultrasound on the conventional mechanical soil-washing process was investigated. To determine the optimal frequency for maximum efficiency, tests were conducted with aluminum foils under four frequencies including 35, 72, 110, and 170 kHz. It is known that the physical effects generated during acoustic cavitation damage the foil by causing pits and holes. The sonication at 35 kHz resulted in maximum damage to the aluminum foil as compared to that observed at other frequencies. Based on these results, 35 kHz was selected for the ultrasonic soil-washing processes in this study. The optimal washing time was found to be 1 min, because there was no significant increase in the removal efficiency over 1 min for the three processes, mechanical, ultrasonic, and combined ultrasonicmechanical. It was also found that the combined process enhanced the performance of the soil-washing process significantly as compared to other two processes in terms of (i) diesel removal efficiency, (ii) process time, (iii) consumption of electric energy, and (iv) production of washing leachate. The efficiency of washing under ultrasonic processing conditions was similar to that observed with mechanical washing in the presence of small amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), suggesting that the ultrasonic washing process does not require external chemicals and can be considered as a "green" process.

AB - The effect of ultrasound on the conventional mechanical soil-washing process was investigated. To determine the optimal frequency for maximum efficiency, tests were conducted with aluminum foils under four frequencies including 35, 72, 110, and 170 kHz. It is known that the physical effects generated during acoustic cavitation damage the foil by causing pits and holes. The sonication at 35 kHz resulted in maximum damage to the aluminum foil as compared to that observed at other frequencies. Based on these results, 35 kHz was selected for the ultrasonic soil-washing processes in this study. The optimal washing time was found to be 1 min, because there was no significant increase in the removal efficiency over 1 min for the three processes, mechanical, ultrasonic, and combined ultrasonicmechanical. It was also found that the combined process enhanced the performance of the soil-washing process significantly as compared to other two processes in terms of (i) diesel removal efficiency, (ii) process time, (iii) consumption of electric energy, and (iv) production of washing leachate. The efficiency of washing under ultrasonic processing conditions was similar to that observed with mechanical washing in the presence of small amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), suggesting that the ultrasonic washing process does not require external chemicals and can be considered as a "green" process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951472741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951472741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/ie1016688

DO - 10.1021/ie1016688

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 2400

EP - 2407

JO - Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

JF - Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

SN - 0888-5885

IS - 4

ER -