TY - JOUR
T1 - Competitive sorption and availability of coexisting heavy metals in mining-contaminated soil
T2 - Contrasting effects of mesquite and fishbone biochars
AU - Abdin, Yassir
AU - Usman, Adel
AU - Ok, Yong Sik
AU - Tsang, Yiu Fai
AU - Al-Wabel, Mohammad
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Program (Research Pooling Initiative), Ministry of Education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, (RPI-KSU).
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding from the Research and Development (R&D) Program (Research Pooling Initiative), Ministry of Education , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, ( RPI - KSU ). Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Mesquite and fishbone were pyrolyzed to produce biochar (MBC and FBC, respectively) at different temperatures. The effects of the MBC and FBC on the removal of single and competitive metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, and Cu) from aqueous solutions were evaluated. A greenhouse pot experiment was also conducted using wheat plants with the mining-contaminated soils. In the presence of MBC or FBC (dosages of 15 and 30 g kg−1), the bioavailability of co-existing Cd, Pb, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe were assessed. The results clearly indicated competitive adsorption among metals with the highest adsorption preference toward Pb. The removal efficiency and partition coefficient (PC) values of heavy metals for FBCs were higher than those for MBCs. These two values increased with MBC pyrolysis temperature under both single- and multi-metals adsorption conditions. Applying FBC to mining soil resulted in the highest reduction in most NH4NO3-extractable heavy metals, reducing their availability to wheat plants. At the highest application dosage of 30 g kg−1, the highest metal immobilization, which accounted for 40.0% and 43.0% for Pb, 61.7% and 66.2% for Cu, 48.3% and 55.6% for Zn, and 32.7% and 33.8% for Cd, was achieved following the application of FBC400 and FBC600, respectively. However, applying MBC lead to a significant reduction in the availability of Cu and Pb but not that of Zn and Cd. FBC is thus more effective in removing heavy metal from aqueous solutions, as well as in immobilizing co-existing heavy metals in contaminated mining soil. It could, therefore, be an effective sorbent and immobilizing agent.
AB - Mesquite and fishbone were pyrolyzed to produce biochar (MBC and FBC, respectively) at different temperatures. The effects of the MBC and FBC on the removal of single and competitive metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, and Cu) from aqueous solutions were evaluated. A greenhouse pot experiment was also conducted using wheat plants with the mining-contaminated soils. In the presence of MBC or FBC (dosages of 15 and 30 g kg−1), the bioavailability of co-existing Cd, Pb, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe were assessed. The results clearly indicated competitive adsorption among metals with the highest adsorption preference toward Pb. The removal efficiency and partition coefficient (PC) values of heavy metals for FBCs were higher than those for MBCs. These two values increased with MBC pyrolysis temperature under both single- and multi-metals adsorption conditions. Applying FBC to mining soil resulted in the highest reduction in most NH4NO3-extractable heavy metals, reducing their availability to wheat plants. At the highest application dosage of 30 g kg−1, the highest metal immobilization, which accounted for 40.0% and 43.0% for Pb, 61.7% and 66.2% for Cu, 48.3% and 55.6% for Zn, and 32.7% and 33.8% for Cd, was achieved following the application of FBC400 and FBC600, respectively. However, applying MBC lead to a significant reduction in the availability of Cu and Pb but not that of Zn and Cd. FBC is thus more effective in removing heavy metal from aqueous solutions, as well as in immobilizing co-existing heavy metals in contaminated mining soil. It could, therefore, be an effective sorbent and immobilizing agent.
KW - Feedstock
KW - Heavy metals
KW - Immobilization
KW - Pyrolysis temperature
KW - Soil remediation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075338717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108846
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108846
M3 - Article
C2 - 31740040
AN - SCOPUS:85075338717
VL - 181
JO - Environmental Research
JF - Environmental Research
SN - 0013-9351
M1 - 108846
ER -