Abstract
Flexicurity, or the integration of labor market flexibility with social security and active labor market policies, has figured prominently in economic and social policy discussions in Europe since the mid-1990s. Such policies are designed to transcend traditional labor-capital conflicts and to form a mutually supportive nexus of flexibility and security within a climate of intensified competition and rapid technological change. International bodies have marketed flexicurity as an innovative win-win strategy for employers and workers alike, commonly citing Denmark and the Netherlands as exemplars of best practice. In this article, we apply a social determinants of health framework to conduct a scoping review of the academic and gray literature to: (a) better understand the empirical associations between flexicurity practices and population health in Denmark and (b) assess the relevance and feasibility of implementing such policies to improve health and reduce health inequalities in Ontario, Canada. Based on 39 studies meeting our full inclusion criteria, preliminary findings suggest that flexicurity is limited as a potential health promotion strategy in Ontario, offers more risks to workers' health than benefits, and requires the strengthening of other social protections before it could be realistically implemented within a Canadian context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 473-482 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | International Journal of Health Services |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 Jan 1 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Cite this
Complementarities or contradictions? scoping the health dimensions of "flexicurity" labor market policies. / Afzal, Zabia; Muntaner, Carles; Chung, Haejoo; Mahmood, Qamar; Ng, Edwin; Schrecker, Ted.
In: International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.01.2013, p. 473-482.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Complementarities or contradictions? scoping the health dimensions of "flexicurity" labor market policies
AU - Afzal, Zabia
AU - Muntaner, Carles
AU - Chung, Haejoo
AU - Mahmood, Qamar
AU - Ng, Edwin
AU - Schrecker, Ted
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Flexicurity, or the integration of labor market flexibility with social security and active labor market policies, has figured prominently in economic and social policy discussions in Europe since the mid-1990s. Such policies are designed to transcend traditional labor-capital conflicts and to form a mutually supportive nexus of flexibility and security within a climate of intensified competition and rapid technological change. International bodies have marketed flexicurity as an innovative win-win strategy for employers and workers alike, commonly citing Denmark and the Netherlands as exemplars of best practice. In this article, we apply a social determinants of health framework to conduct a scoping review of the academic and gray literature to: (a) better understand the empirical associations between flexicurity practices and population health in Denmark and (b) assess the relevance and feasibility of implementing such policies to improve health and reduce health inequalities in Ontario, Canada. Based on 39 studies meeting our full inclusion criteria, preliminary findings suggest that flexicurity is limited as a potential health promotion strategy in Ontario, offers more risks to workers' health than benefits, and requires the strengthening of other social protections before it could be realistically implemented within a Canadian context.
AB - Flexicurity, or the integration of labor market flexibility with social security and active labor market policies, has figured prominently in economic and social policy discussions in Europe since the mid-1990s. Such policies are designed to transcend traditional labor-capital conflicts and to form a mutually supportive nexus of flexibility and security within a climate of intensified competition and rapid technological change. International bodies have marketed flexicurity as an innovative win-win strategy for employers and workers alike, commonly citing Denmark and the Netherlands as exemplars of best practice. In this article, we apply a social determinants of health framework to conduct a scoping review of the academic and gray literature to: (a) better understand the empirical associations between flexicurity practices and population health in Denmark and (b) assess the relevance and feasibility of implementing such policies to improve health and reduce health inequalities in Ontario, Canada. Based on 39 studies meeting our full inclusion criteria, preliminary findings suggest that flexicurity is limited as a potential health promotion strategy in Ontario, offers more risks to workers' health than benefits, and requires the strengthening of other social protections before it could be realistically implemented within a Canadian context.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880565638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880565638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2190/HS.43.3.f
DO - 10.2190/HS.43.3.f
M3 - Article
C2 - 24066416
AN - SCOPUS:84880565638
VL - 43
SP - 473
EP - 482
JO - International Journal of Health Services
JF - International Journal of Health Services
SN - 0020-7314
IS - 3
ER -