Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators

Myonggeun Yoon, Jin Sung Kim, Dongho Shin, Sung Yong Park, Se Byeong Lee, Dae Yong Kim, Taehyun Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Kwan Ho Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors have developed an automatic quality assurance method based on computerized tomography (CT) data for physically manufactured proton range compensators. Eight range compensators used for proton therapy at their institution were scanned using CT and their depth distributions were compared with data provided by a proton treatment planning system (TPS). The depth difference (DD), distance to agreement (DTA), and a composite analysis (CA) indicating regions that passed either of the tests were used for depth verification. When the tolerance limits were set at 3 mm for DD and 1 mm for DTA, the average percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DD, DTA, and CA for the eight compensators were 9.0%, 5.3% and 3.2%, respectively. In general, the percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria were much higher in DD than in DTA analysis and mismatch of depth was greater in regions with high depth gradients. This is considered to arise mainly because of systematic errors such as the physical size of the drill, slight bending or slipping of the drill bit near high gradient regions, the limit of CT resolution, and the uncertainty in CT number. When the tolerance limit of DTA was increased from 1 to 2 mm, the average percentage of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DTA was reduced from 5.3% to 0.9%. Their results show that depth comparison of proton range compensators based on CT images can provide more systematic data than does the current method, in which a representative group of drill points is measured manually.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3511-3517
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Aug 5
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Protons
Mandrillus
Tomography
Proton Therapy
Uncertainty
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Computerized tomography
  • Proton radiotherapy
  • Range compensator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Yoon, M., Kim, J. S., Shin, D., Park, S. Y., Lee, S. B., Kim, D. Y., ... Cho, K. H. (2008). Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators. Medical Physics, 35(8), 3511-3517. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2952645

Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators. / Yoon, Myonggeun; Kim, Jin Sung; Shin, Dongho; Park, Sung Yong; Lee, Se Byeong; Kim, Dae Yong; Kim, Taehyun; Shin, Kyung Hwan; Cho, Kwan Ho.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 8, 05.08.2008, p. 3511-3517.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoon, M, Kim, JS, Shin, D, Park, SY, Lee, SB, Kim, DY, Kim, T, Shin, KH & Cho, KH 2008, 'Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators', Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 3511-3517. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2952645
Yoon, Myonggeun ; Kim, Jin Sung ; Shin, Dongho ; Park, Sung Yong ; Lee, Se Byeong ; Kim, Dae Yong ; Kim, Taehyun ; Shin, Kyung Hwan ; Cho, Kwan Ho. / Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators. In: Medical Physics. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 8. pp. 3511-3517.
@article{b56a0024adf849a4b5b80f721bf09d8f,
title = "Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators",
abstract = "The authors have developed an automatic quality assurance method based on computerized tomography (CT) data for physically manufactured proton range compensators. Eight range compensators used for proton therapy at their institution were scanned using CT and their depth distributions were compared with data provided by a proton treatment planning system (TPS). The depth difference (DD), distance to agreement (DTA), and a composite analysis (CA) indicating regions that passed either of the tests were used for depth verification. When the tolerance limits were set at 3 mm for DD and 1 mm for DTA, the average percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DD, DTA, and CA for the eight compensators were 9.0{\%}, 5.3{\%} and 3.2{\%}, respectively. In general, the percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria were much higher in DD than in DTA analysis and mismatch of depth was greater in regions with high depth gradients. This is considered to arise mainly because of systematic errors such as the physical size of the drill, slight bending or slipping of the drill bit near high gradient regions, the limit of CT resolution, and the uncertainty in CT number. When the tolerance limit of DTA was increased from 1 to 2 mm, the average percentage of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DTA was reduced from 5.3{\%} to 0.9{\%}. Their results show that depth comparison of proton range compensators based on CT images can provide more systematic data than does the current method, in which a representative group of drill points is measured manually.",
keywords = "Computerized tomography, Proton radiotherapy, Range compensator",
author = "Myonggeun Yoon and Kim, {Jin Sung} and Dongho Shin and Park, {Sung Yong} and Lee, {Se Byeong} and Kim, {Dae Yong} and Taehyun Kim and Shin, {Kyung Hwan} and Cho, {Kwan Ho}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1118/1.2952645",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "3511--3517",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators

AU - Yoon, Myonggeun

AU - Kim, Jin Sung

AU - Shin, Dongho

AU - Park, Sung Yong

AU - Lee, Se Byeong

AU - Kim, Dae Yong

AU - Kim, Taehyun

AU - Shin, Kyung Hwan

AU - Cho, Kwan Ho

PY - 2008/8/5

Y1 - 2008/8/5

N2 - The authors have developed an automatic quality assurance method based on computerized tomography (CT) data for physically manufactured proton range compensators. Eight range compensators used for proton therapy at their institution were scanned using CT and their depth distributions were compared with data provided by a proton treatment planning system (TPS). The depth difference (DD), distance to agreement (DTA), and a composite analysis (CA) indicating regions that passed either of the tests were used for depth verification. When the tolerance limits were set at 3 mm for DD and 1 mm for DTA, the average percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DD, DTA, and CA for the eight compensators were 9.0%, 5.3% and 3.2%, respectively. In general, the percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria were much higher in DD than in DTA analysis and mismatch of depth was greater in regions with high depth gradients. This is considered to arise mainly because of systematic errors such as the physical size of the drill, slight bending or slipping of the drill bit near high gradient regions, the limit of CT resolution, and the uncertainty in CT number. When the tolerance limit of DTA was increased from 1 to 2 mm, the average percentage of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DTA was reduced from 5.3% to 0.9%. Their results show that depth comparison of proton range compensators based on CT images can provide more systematic data than does the current method, in which a representative group of drill points is measured manually.

AB - The authors have developed an automatic quality assurance method based on computerized tomography (CT) data for physically manufactured proton range compensators. Eight range compensators used for proton therapy at their institution were scanned using CT and their depth distributions were compared with data provided by a proton treatment planning system (TPS). The depth difference (DD), distance to agreement (DTA), and a composite analysis (CA) indicating regions that passed either of the tests were used for depth verification. When the tolerance limits were set at 3 mm for DD and 1 mm for DTA, the average percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DD, DTA, and CA for the eight compensators were 9.0%, 5.3% and 3.2%, respectively. In general, the percentages of points exceeding the acceptance criteria were much higher in DD than in DTA analysis and mismatch of depth was greater in regions with high depth gradients. This is considered to arise mainly because of systematic errors such as the physical size of the drill, slight bending or slipping of the drill bit near high gradient regions, the limit of CT resolution, and the uncertainty in CT number. When the tolerance limit of DTA was increased from 1 to 2 mm, the average percentage of points exceeding the acceptance criteria for DTA was reduced from 5.3% to 0.9%. Their results show that depth comparison of proton range compensators based on CT images can provide more systematic data than does the current method, in which a representative group of drill points is measured manually.

KW - Computerized tomography

KW - Proton radiotherapy

KW - Range compensator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349132192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349132192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2952645

DO - 10.1118/1.2952645

M3 - Article

C2 - 18777911

AN - SCOPUS:48349132192

VL - 35

SP - 3511

EP - 3517

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 8

ER -