Constrained or unconstrained price for debit card payment?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Retailers in the Netherlands and the U.K. can charge different prices for a commodity depending on whether cash or a debit card is used as payment, whereas retailers in the U.S. generally cannot. These two types of economies with and without a uniform pricing constraint for cash and debit card payments are compared in a microfounded monetary model. We place particular emphasis on the distinctive features of cash and debit cards as payment methods: the cost of a cash transaction for the seller is typically lower than that of a debit card, whereas the cost of cash holdings for the buyer is higher than that of a debit card. Our results suggest that a uniform pricing constraint makes cash-holding costs decline but consumption dispersion between the poor and the rich increase. Numerical examples show that the beneficial effect of the constraint dominates its negative effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-65
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Macroeconomics
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Debit cards
Payment
Cash
Costs
Cash holdings
Uniform pricing
Retailers
Buyers
Payment methods
Charge
The Netherlands
Seller
Commodities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Constrained or unconstrained price for debit card payment? / Lee, Manjong.

In: Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 41, 01.01.2014, p. 53-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db8b76bafaf244c8a5b5961c1cbdfdd5,
title = "Constrained or unconstrained price for debit card payment?",
abstract = "Retailers in the Netherlands and the U.K. can charge different prices for a commodity depending on whether cash or a debit card is used as payment, whereas retailers in the U.S. generally cannot. These two types of economies with and without a uniform pricing constraint for cash and debit card payments are compared in a microfounded monetary model. We place particular emphasis on the distinctive features of cash and debit cards as payment methods: the cost of a cash transaction for the seller is typically lower than that of a debit card, whereas the cost of cash holdings for the buyer is higher than that of a debit card. Our results suggest that a uniform pricing constraint makes cash-holding costs decline but consumption dispersion between the poor and the rich increase. Numerical examples show that the beneficial effect of the constraint dominates its negative effect.",
keywords = "Cash, Constrained price, Debit card, Unconstrained price",
author = "Manjong Lee",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "53--65",
journal = "Journal of Macroeconomics",
issn = "0164-0704",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constrained or unconstrained price for debit card payment?

AU - Lee, Manjong

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Retailers in the Netherlands and the U.K. can charge different prices for a commodity depending on whether cash or a debit card is used as payment, whereas retailers in the U.S. generally cannot. These two types of economies with and without a uniform pricing constraint for cash and debit card payments are compared in a microfounded monetary model. We place particular emphasis on the distinctive features of cash and debit cards as payment methods: the cost of a cash transaction for the seller is typically lower than that of a debit card, whereas the cost of cash holdings for the buyer is higher than that of a debit card. Our results suggest that a uniform pricing constraint makes cash-holding costs decline but consumption dispersion between the poor and the rich increase. Numerical examples show that the beneficial effect of the constraint dominates its negative effect.

AB - Retailers in the Netherlands and the U.K. can charge different prices for a commodity depending on whether cash or a debit card is used as payment, whereas retailers in the U.S. generally cannot. These two types of economies with and without a uniform pricing constraint for cash and debit card payments are compared in a microfounded monetary model. We place particular emphasis on the distinctive features of cash and debit cards as payment methods: the cost of a cash transaction for the seller is typically lower than that of a debit card, whereas the cost of cash holdings for the buyer is higher than that of a debit card. Our results suggest that a uniform pricing constraint makes cash-holding costs decline but consumption dispersion between the poor and the rich increase. Numerical examples show that the beneficial effect of the constraint dominates its negative effect.

KW - Cash

KW - Constrained price

KW - Debit card

KW - Unconstrained price

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904861219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904861219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.04.004

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 53

EP - 65

JO - Journal of Macroeconomics

JF - Journal of Macroeconomics

SN - 0164-0704

ER -