Constructability and heat exchange efficiency of large diameter cast-in-place energy piles with various configurations of heat exchange pipe

Sangwoo Park, Chihun Sung, Kyoungsik Jung, Byonghu Sohn, Alexis Chauchois, Hangseok Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new ground heat exchanger (GHEX) assembled in a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system has been devised, which is equipped in a structural pile, and thus called an "energy pile". In this study, six large-diameter cast-in-place energy piles that encased various types of heat exchange pipes (i.e., three parallel U-types with 5 pairs, 8 pairs and 10 pairs; two coil-types with 200mm coil pitch and 500mm coil pitch; and S-type) were constructed in a test bed, and the constructability of each type of the energy pile was compared. Additionally, a 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was separately constructed to compare the thermal performance and economic feasibility with the energy piles. A series of in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs) was performed to evaluate the relative heat exchange efficiency of each energy pile according to the various heat exchange pipe configurations. The relative heat exchange efficiency obtained in the cast-in-place energy piles and the down-sized 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was normalized by the pile length (or borehole length) and the total heat exchange pipe length. The result from the in-situ tests indicates that the longer the heat exchange pipe installed, the higher heat exchange efficiency per pile length. However, in the case of tight layouts of the heat exchange pipe, thermal interference occurs between adjacent pipe loops, which decreases heat exchange efficiency. Economic feasibility of the energy piles was evaluated, considering the material and installation costs for assembling the heat exchange pipe with consideration of the heat exchange efficiency. It is concluded that the coil-type cast-in-place energy pile can achieve sufficient capacity for heat exchange, compared with the closed-loop vertical GHEX.

Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Thermal Engineering
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2015 Jan 5

Fingerprint

Piles
Pipe
Heat exchangers
Hot Temperature
Geothermal heat pumps
Heat pump systems
Economics
Boreholes
Enthalpy

Keywords

  • Closed-loop vertical ground heat exchanger
  • Constructability of energy pile
  • Energy pile
  • In-situ thermal response test
  • Relative heat exchange efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Constructability and heat exchange efficiency of large diameter cast-in-place energy piles with various configurations of heat exchange pipe. / Park, Sangwoo; Sung, Chihun; Jung, Kyoungsik; Sohn, Byonghu; Chauchois, Alexis; Choi, Hangseok.

In: Applied Thermal Engineering, 05.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b3acb1d5b0948efb15366d862ee73cb,
title = "Constructability and heat exchange efficiency of large diameter cast-in-place energy piles with various configurations of heat exchange pipe",
abstract = "A new ground heat exchanger (GHEX) assembled in a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system has been devised, which is equipped in a structural pile, and thus called an {"}energy pile{"}. In this study, six large-diameter cast-in-place energy piles that encased various types of heat exchange pipes (i.e., three parallel U-types with 5 pairs, 8 pairs and 10 pairs; two coil-types with 200mm coil pitch and 500mm coil pitch; and S-type) were constructed in a test bed, and the constructability of each type of the energy pile was compared. Additionally, a 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was separately constructed to compare the thermal performance and economic feasibility with the energy piles. A series of in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs) was performed to evaluate the relative heat exchange efficiency of each energy pile according to the various heat exchange pipe configurations. The relative heat exchange efficiency obtained in the cast-in-place energy piles and the down-sized 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was normalized by the pile length (or borehole length) and the total heat exchange pipe length. The result from the in-situ tests indicates that the longer the heat exchange pipe installed, the higher heat exchange efficiency per pile length. However, in the case of tight layouts of the heat exchange pipe, thermal interference occurs between adjacent pipe loops, which decreases heat exchange efficiency. Economic feasibility of the energy piles was evaluated, considering the material and installation costs for assembling the heat exchange pipe with consideration of the heat exchange efficiency. It is concluded that the coil-type cast-in-place energy pile can achieve sufficient capacity for heat exchange, compared with the closed-loop vertical GHEX.",
keywords = "Closed-loop vertical ground heat exchanger, Constructability of energy pile, Energy pile, In-situ thermal response test, Relative heat exchange efficiency",
author = "Sangwoo Park and Chihun Sung and Kyoungsik Jung and Byonghu Sohn and Alexis Chauchois and Hangseok Choi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.044",
language = "English",
journal = "Applied Thermal Engineering",
issn = "1359-4311",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructability and heat exchange efficiency of large diameter cast-in-place energy piles with various configurations of heat exchange pipe

AU - Park, Sangwoo

AU - Sung, Chihun

AU - Jung, Kyoungsik

AU - Sohn, Byonghu

AU - Chauchois, Alexis

AU - Choi, Hangseok

PY - 2015/1/5

Y1 - 2015/1/5

N2 - A new ground heat exchanger (GHEX) assembled in a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system has been devised, which is equipped in a structural pile, and thus called an "energy pile". In this study, six large-diameter cast-in-place energy piles that encased various types of heat exchange pipes (i.e., three parallel U-types with 5 pairs, 8 pairs and 10 pairs; two coil-types with 200mm coil pitch and 500mm coil pitch; and S-type) were constructed in a test bed, and the constructability of each type of the energy pile was compared. Additionally, a 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was separately constructed to compare the thermal performance and economic feasibility with the energy piles. A series of in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs) was performed to evaluate the relative heat exchange efficiency of each energy pile according to the various heat exchange pipe configurations. The relative heat exchange efficiency obtained in the cast-in-place energy piles and the down-sized 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was normalized by the pile length (or borehole length) and the total heat exchange pipe length. The result from the in-situ tests indicates that the longer the heat exchange pipe installed, the higher heat exchange efficiency per pile length. However, in the case of tight layouts of the heat exchange pipe, thermal interference occurs between adjacent pipe loops, which decreases heat exchange efficiency. Economic feasibility of the energy piles was evaluated, considering the material and installation costs for assembling the heat exchange pipe with consideration of the heat exchange efficiency. It is concluded that the coil-type cast-in-place energy pile can achieve sufficient capacity for heat exchange, compared with the closed-loop vertical GHEX.

AB - A new ground heat exchanger (GHEX) assembled in a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system has been devised, which is equipped in a structural pile, and thus called an "energy pile". In this study, six large-diameter cast-in-place energy piles that encased various types of heat exchange pipes (i.e., three parallel U-types with 5 pairs, 8 pairs and 10 pairs; two coil-types with 200mm coil pitch and 500mm coil pitch; and S-type) were constructed in a test bed, and the constructability of each type of the energy pile was compared. Additionally, a 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was separately constructed to compare the thermal performance and economic feasibility with the energy piles. A series of in-situ thermal response tests (TRTs) was performed to evaluate the relative heat exchange efficiency of each energy pile according to the various heat exchange pipe configurations. The relative heat exchange efficiency obtained in the cast-in-place energy piles and the down-sized 30m-deep closed-loop vertical GHEX was normalized by the pile length (or borehole length) and the total heat exchange pipe length. The result from the in-situ tests indicates that the longer the heat exchange pipe installed, the higher heat exchange efficiency per pile length. However, in the case of tight layouts of the heat exchange pipe, thermal interference occurs between adjacent pipe loops, which decreases heat exchange efficiency. Economic feasibility of the energy piles was evaluated, considering the material and installation costs for assembling the heat exchange pipe with consideration of the heat exchange efficiency. It is concluded that the coil-type cast-in-place energy pile can achieve sufficient capacity for heat exchange, compared with the closed-loop vertical GHEX.

KW - Closed-loop vertical ground heat exchanger

KW - Constructability of energy pile

KW - Energy pile

KW - In-situ thermal response test

KW - Relative heat exchange efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930698297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930698297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.044

DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930698297

JO - Applied Thermal Engineering

JF - Applied Thermal Engineering

SN - 1359-4311

ER -