Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges

Barbara Barzansky, Dan Hunt, Geneviève Moineau, Duck-Sun Ahn, Chi Wan Lai, Holly Humphrey, Linda Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas.Aims: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards.Methods: Case examples from the United States, Canada, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, were collected and analyzed to determine the strengths and challenges of the CQI processes implemented by a national association of medical schools and several medical school accrediting bodies. The CQI process at a single medical school also was reviewed.Results: A functional CQI process should be focused directly on accreditation standards so as to result in the improvement of educational quality and outcomes, be feasible to implement, avoid duplication of effort and have both commitment and resource support from the sponsoring entity and the individual medical schools.Conclusions: CQI can enhance educational program quality and outcomes, if the process is designed to collect relevant information and the results are used for program improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1032-1038
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

accreditation
education
school
sponsoring
educational program
Korea
republic
Taiwan
Canada
commitment
ability
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Barzansky, B., Hunt, D., Moineau, G., Ahn, D-S., Lai, C. W., Humphrey, H., & Peterson, L. (2015). Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges. Medical Teacher, 37(11), 1032-1038. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735

Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education : Benefits and challenges. / Barzansky, Barbara; Hunt, Dan; Moineau, Geneviève; Ahn, Duck-Sun; Lai, Chi Wan; Humphrey, Holly; Peterson, Linda.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 37, No. 11, 01.01.2015, p. 1032-1038.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barzansky, B, Hunt, D, Moineau, G, Ahn, D-S, Lai, CW, Humphrey, H & Peterson, L 2015, 'Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges', Medical Teacher, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1032-1038. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735
Barzansky, Barbara ; Hunt, Dan ; Moineau, Geneviève ; Ahn, Duck-Sun ; Lai, Chi Wan ; Humphrey, Holly ; Peterson, Linda. / Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education : Benefits and challenges. In: Medical Teacher. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 11. pp. 1032-1038.
@article{ac633bafcc464f8382db385601653258,
title = "Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges",
abstract = "Background: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas.Aims: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards.Methods: Case examples from the United States, Canada, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, were collected and analyzed to determine the strengths and challenges of the CQI processes implemented by a national association of medical schools and several medical school accrediting bodies. The CQI process at a single medical school also was reviewed.Results: A functional CQI process should be focused directly on accreditation standards so as to result in the improvement of educational quality and outcomes, be feasible to implement, avoid duplication of effort and have both commitment and resource support from the sponsoring entity and the individual medical schools.Conclusions: CQI can enhance educational program quality and outcomes, if the process is designed to collect relevant information and the results are used for program improvement.",
author = "Barbara Barzansky and Dan Hunt and Genevi{\`e}ve Moineau and Duck-Sun Ahn and Lai, {Chi Wan} and Holly Humphrey and Linda Peterson",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1032--1038",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education

T2 - Benefits and challenges

AU - Barzansky, Barbara

AU - Hunt, Dan

AU - Moineau, Geneviève

AU - Ahn, Duck-Sun

AU - Lai, Chi Wan

AU - Humphrey, Holly

AU - Peterson, Linda

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas.Aims: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards.Methods: Case examples from the United States, Canada, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, were collected and analyzed to determine the strengths and challenges of the CQI processes implemented by a national association of medical schools and several medical school accrediting bodies. The CQI process at a single medical school also was reviewed.Results: A functional CQI process should be focused directly on accreditation standards so as to result in the improvement of educational quality and outcomes, be feasible to implement, avoid duplication of effort and have both commitment and resource support from the sponsoring entity and the individual medical schools.Conclusions: CQI can enhance educational program quality and outcomes, if the process is designed to collect relevant information and the results are used for program improvement.

AB - Background: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas.Aims: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards.Methods: Case examples from the United States, Canada, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, were collected and analyzed to determine the strengths and challenges of the CQI processes implemented by a national association of medical schools and several medical school accrediting bodies. The CQI process at a single medical school also was reviewed.Results: A functional CQI process should be focused directly on accreditation standards so as to result in the improvement of educational quality and outcomes, be feasible to implement, avoid duplication of effort and have both commitment and resource support from the sponsoring entity and the individual medical schools.Conclusions: CQI can enhance educational program quality and outcomes, if the process is designed to collect relevant information and the results are used for program improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946821302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946821302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735

M3 - Article

C2 - 25897708

AN - SCOPUS:84946821302

VL - 37

SP - 1032

EP - 1038

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 11

ER -