Could ultrasound-guided stimulation of sural nerve affect nerve conduction study?

Hanboram Choi, Seong Yun Chung, Seok Kang, Seong Ho Son, Joon Shik Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To determine anatomical variation of the sural nerve (SN) by ultrasonography (US) and compare sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of the SN obtained by a control method to that obtained with adjusted method using US. Methods Eighty legs of 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The location and formation of SN were investigated through US. Two methods of nerve conduction study (NCS) were then performed. In the control method, the cathode was placed 14 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and the greatest SNAP amplitude was obtained by moving the cathode medially or laterally from just lateral to the calf-mid line. In adjusted NCS, the exact SN union site was stimulated in type 1. In other SN types, the stimulation was done directly over the nerve and the distance from the lateral malleolus was set to be 14 cm. Results It was found that 73.8% of the SNs were type 1, 22.5% were direct continuation of MSCN (type 2), and 3.8% were MSCN and LSCN without communicating (type 4). However, type 3 was not found. The union point in type 1 SN was 12.6±2.5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and 1.4±0.7 cm lateral to the calf-midline. After stimulation adjustment, SNAP amplitude in type 1 SN was significantly increased (20.7±5.5 μV vs. 27.1±6.7 μV). Conclusion Anatomical variation of SN and its location were verified by US. US provides additional information for conducting sural NCS and helps obtain more accurate results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-80
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Sural Nerve
Neural Conduction
Ultrasonography
Action Potentials
Electrodes
Leg
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Nerve conduction study
  • Sural nerve
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Could ultrasound-guided stimulation of sural nerve affect nerve conduction study? / Choi, Hanboram; Chung, Seong Yun; Kang, Seok; Son, Seong Ho; Yoon, Joon Shik.

In: Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 74-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Choi, Hanboram ; Chung, Seong Yun ; Kang, Seok ; Son, Seong Ho ; Yoon, Joon Shik. / Could ultrasound-guided stimulation of sural nerve affect nerve conduction study?. In: Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 74-80.
@article{3737fbc7ac57424884bb5f251a00fb89,
title = "Could ultrasound-guided stimulation of sural nerve affect nerve conduction study?",
abstract = "Objective To determine anatomical variation of the sural nerve (SN) by ultrasonography (US) and compare sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of the SN obtained by a control method to that obtained with adjusted method using US. Methods Eighty legs of 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The location and formation of SN were investigated through US. Two methods of nerve conduction study (NCS) were then performed. In the control method, the cathode was placed 14 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and the greatest SNAP amplitude was obtained by moving the cathode medially or laterally from just lateral to the calf-mid line. In adjusted NCS, the exact SN union site was stimulated in type 1. In other SN types, the stimulation was done directly over the nerve and the distance from the lateral malleolus was set to be 14 cm. Results It was found that 73.8{\%} of the SNs were type 1, 22.5{\%} were direct continuation of MSCN (type 2), and 3.8{\%} were MSCN and LSCN without communicating (type 4). However, type 3 was not found. The union point in type 1 SN was 12.6±2.5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and 1.4±0.7 cm lateral to the calf-midline. After stimulation adjustment, SNAP amplitude in type 1 SN was significantly increased (20.7±5.5 μV vs. 27.1±6.7 μV). Conclusion Anatomical variation of SN and its location were verified by US. US provides additional information for conducting sural NCS and helps obtain more accurate results.",
keywords = "Nerve conduction study, Sural nerve, Ultrasonography",
author = "Hanboram Choi and Chung, {Seong Yun} and Seok Kang and Son, {Seong Ho} and Yoon, {Joon Shik}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.74",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "74--80",
journal = "Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "2234-0645",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (KARM)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could ultrasound-guided stimulation of sural nerve affect nerve conduction study?

AU - Choi, Hanboram

AU - Chung, Seong Yun

AU - Kang, Seok

AU - Son, Seong Ho

AU - Yoon, Joon Shik

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective To determine anatomical variation of the sural nerve (SN) by ultrasonography (US) and compare sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of the SN obtained by a control method to that obtained with adjusted method using US. Methods Eighty legs of 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The location and formation of SN were investigated through US. Two methods of nerve conduction study (NCS) were then performed. In the control method, the cathode was placed 14 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and the greatest SNAP amplitude was obtained by moving the cathode medially or laterally from just lateral to the calf-mid line. In adjusted NCS, the exact SN union site was stimulated in type 1. In other SN types, the stimulation was done directly over the nerve and the distance from the lateral malleolus was set to be 14 cm. Results It was found that 73.8% of the SNs were type 1, 22.5% were direct continuation of MSCN (type 2), and 3.8% were MSCN and LSCN without communicating (type 4). However, type 3 was not found. The union point in type 1 SN was 12.6±2.5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and 1.4±0.7 cm lateral to the calf-midline. After stimulation adjustment, SNAP amplitude in type 1 SN was significantly increased (20.7±5.5 μV vs. 27.1±6.7 μV). Conclusion Anatomical variation of SN and its location were verified by US. US provides additional information for conducting sural NCS and helps obtain more accurate results.

AB - Objective To determine anatomical variation of the sural nerve (SN) by ultrasonography (US) and compare sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of the SN obtained by a control method to that obtained with adjusted method using US. Methods Eighty legs of 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The location and formation of SN were investigated through US. Two methods of nerve conduction study (NCS) were then performed. In the control method, the cathode was placed 14 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and the greatest SNAP amplitude was obtained by moving the cathode medially or laterally from just lateral to the calf-mid line. In adjusted NCS, the exact SN union site was stimulated in type 1. In other SN types, the stimulation was done directly over the nerve and the distance from the lateral malleolus was set to be 14 cm. Results It was found that 73.8% of the SNs were type 1, 22.5% were direct continuation of MSCN (type 2), and 3.8% were MSCN and LSCN without communicating (type 4). However, type 3 was not found. The union point in type 1 SN was 12.6±2.5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and 1.4±0.7 cm lateral to the calf-midline. After stimulation adjustment, SNAP amplitude in type 1 SN was significantly increased (20.7±5.5 μV vs. 27.1±6.7 μV). Conclusion Anatomical variation of SN and its location were verified by US. US provides additional information for conducting sural NCS and helps obtain more accurate results.

KW - Nerve conduction study

KW - Sural nerve

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062551721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062551721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.74

DO - 10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.74

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 74

EP - 80

JO - Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 2234-0645

IS - 1

ER -