CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation

Aaron M. Shew, L. Lanier Nalley, Heather A. Snell, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Bruce L. Dixon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)


CRISPR gene-editing has major implications for agriculture and food security. However, no studies have evaluated the public acceptance and valuation of CRISPR-produced food. As such, we conducted a multi-country assessment of consumers’ willingness-to-consume (WTC) and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for CRISPR-produced food compared to conventional and genetically modified (GM) foods, respectively. In the USA, Canada, Belgium, France, and Australia, 56, 47, 46, 30, and 51% of respondents, respectively, indicated they would consume both GM and CRISPR food. We also found that biotechnology familiarity and perceptions of safety were the primary drivers for WTC CRISPR and GM food. Moreover, respondents valued CRISPR and GM food similarly – substantially less than conventional food – which could be detrimental for meeting future food demand.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-80
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal Food Security
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Dec
Externally publishedYes


  • Agricultural biotechnology
  • Food regulation
  • GMOs
  • Public acceptance
  • Willingness-to-pay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Ecology
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Safety Research


Dive into the research topics of 'CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this