Cr(VI) formation related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite interactions in ultramafic environments

Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha, Meththika Vithanage, Yong Sik Ok, Christopher Oze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chromium is abundantly and primarily present as Cr(III) in ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils. Chromium(III) oxidation involving chromite (FeCr 2O4) via interactions with birnessite has been shown to be a major pathway of Cr(VI) production in serpentine soils. Alternatively, Cr(III)-bearing silicates with less Cr(III) may provide higher Cr(VI) production rates compared to relatively insoluble chromite. Of the potential Cr(III)-bearing silicates, Cr(III)-muscovite (i.e., fuchsite) commonly occurs in metamorphosed ultramafic rocks and dissolution rates may be comparable to other common Cr(III)-bearing phyllosilicates and clays. Here, we examine the formation of Cr(VI) related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite (i.e., acid birnessite) interactions with and without humic matter (HM) via batch experiments. Experimentally, the fastest rate of Cr(VI) production involving Cr(III)-muscovite was 3.8 × 10-1 μM h-1 (pH 3 without HM). Kinetically, Cr(III)-muscovite provides a major pathway for Cr(VI) formation and Cr(VI) production rates may exceed those involving chromite depending on pH, available mineral surface areas in solution, and the abundance of Cr(III) present. However, when HM is introduced to the system, Cr(VI) production rates decrease by as much as 80%. This highlights that HM strongly decreases but may not completely suppress the formation and mobilization of Cr(VI). A Sri Lankan serpentine soil was utilized to provide context with regards to the experimental results. Despite Cr(VI) in the soil solids and Cr(VI) formation being favorable from Cr(III)-bearing minerals, no detectable Cr(VI) was released into soil solutions potentially due to the abundance of HM. Overall, the dynamic interactions of Cr(III)-bearing silicates and birnessite provide a kinetically favorable route of Cr(VI) formation which is tempered by humic matter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9722-9729
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume47
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Sep 2
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

birnessite
muscovite
Bearings (structural)
chromite
silicate
ultramafic rock
soil
chromium
Soil
Silicates
Chromite
Soils
phyllosilicate
mineral
Chromium
mobilization
surface area
Minerals
dissolution
rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Cr(VI) formation related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite interactions in ultramafic environments. / Rajapaksha, Anushka Upamali; Vithanage, Meththika; Ok, Yong Sik; Oze, Christopher.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 17, 02.09.2013, p. 9722-9729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rajapaksha, Anushka Upamali ; Vithanage, Meththika ; Ok, Yong Sik ; Oze, Christopher. / Cr(VI) formation related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite interactions in ultramafic environments. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2013 ; Vol. 47, No. 17. pp. 9722-9729.
@article{b9adbc747a9a406ebd3e53b7cc14695b,
title = "Cr(VI) formation related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite interactions in ultramafic environments",
abstract = "Chromium is abundantly and primarily present as Cr(III) in ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils. Chromium(III) oxidation involving chromite (FeCr 2O4) via interactions with birnessite has been shown to be a major pathway of Cr(VI) production in serpentine soils. Alternatively, Cr(III)-bearing silicates with less Cr(III) may provide higher Cr(VI) production rates compared to relatively insoluble chromite. Of the potential Cr(III)-bearing silicates, Cr(III)-muscovite (i.e., fuchsite) commonly occurs in metamorphosed ultramafic rocks and dissolution rates may be comparable to other common Cr(III)-bearing phyllosilicates and clays. Here, we examine the formation of Cr(VI) related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite (i.e., acid birnessite) interactions with and without humic matter (HM) via batch experiments. Experimentally, the fastest rate of Cr(VI) production involving Cr(III)-muscovite was 3.8 × 10-1 μM h-1 (pH 3 without HM). Kinetically, Cr(III)-muscovite provides a major pathway for Cr(VI) formation and Cr(VI) production rates may exceed those involving chromite depending on pH, available mineral surface areas in solution, and the abundance of Cr(III) present. However, when HM is introduced to the system, Cr(VI) production rates decrease by as much as 80{\%}. This highlights that HM strongly decreases but may not completely suppress the formation and mobilization of Cr(VI). A Sri Lankan serpentine soil was utilized to provide context with regards to the experimental results. Despite Cr(VI) in the soil solids and Cr(VI) formation being favorable from Cr(III)-bearing minerals, no detectable Cr(VI) was released into soil solutions potentially due to the abundance of HM. Overall, the dynamic interactions of Cr(III)-bearing silicates and birnessite provide a kinetically favorable route of Cr(VI) formation which is tempered by humic matter.",
author = "Rajapaksha, {Anushka Upamali} and Meththika Vithanage and Ok, {Yong Sik} and Christopher Oze",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1021/es4015025",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "9722--9729",
journal = "Environmental Science and Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cr(VI) formation related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite interactions in ultramafic environments

AU - Rajapaksha, Anushka Upamali

AU - Vithanage, Meththika

AU - Ok, Yong Sik

AU - Oze, Christopher

PY - 2013/9/2

Y1 - 2013/9/2

N2 - Chromium is abundantly and primarily present as Cr(III) in ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils. Chromium(III) oxidation involving chromite (FeCr 2O4) via interactions with birnessite has been shown to be a major pathway of Cr(VI) production in serpentine soils. Alternatively, Cr(III)-bearing silicates with less Cr(III) may provide higher Cr(VI) production rates compared to relatively insoluble chromite. Of the potential Cr(III)-bearing silicates, Cr(III)-muscovite (i.e., fuchsite) commonly occurs in metamorphosed ultramafic rocks and dissolution rates may be comparable to other common Cr(III)-bearing phyllosilicates and clays. Here, we examine the formation of Cr(VI) related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite (i.e., acid birnessite) interactions with and without humic matter (HM) via batch experiments. Experimentally, the fastest rate of Cr(VI) production involving Cr(III)-muscovite was 3.8 × 10-1 μM h-1 (pH 3 without HM). Kinetically, Cr(III)-muscovite provides a major pathway for Cr(VI) formation and Cr(VI) production rates may exceed those involving chromite depending on pH, available mineral surface areas in solution, and the abundance of Cr(III) present. However, when HM is introduced to the system, Cr(VI) production rates decrease by as much as 80%. This highlights that HM strongly decreases but may not completely suppress the formation and mobilization of Cr(VI). A Sri Lankan serpentine soil was utilized to provide context with regards to the experimental results. Despite Cr(VI) in the soil solids and Cr(VI) formation being favorable from Cr(III)-bearing minerals, no detectable Cr(VI) was released into soil solutions potentially due to the abundance of HM. Overall, the dynamic interactions of Cr(III)-bearing silicates and birnessite provide a kinetically favorable route of Cr(VI) formation which is tempered by humic matter.

AB - Chromium is abundantly and primarily present as Cr(III) in ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils. Chromium(III) oxidation involving chromite (FeCr 2O4) via interactions with birnessite has been shown to be a major pathway of Cr(VI) production in serpentine soils. Alternatively, Cr(III)-bearing silicates with less Cr(III) may provide higher Cr(VI) production rates compared to relatively insoluble chromite. Of the potential Cr(III)-bearing silicates, Cr(III)-muscovite (i.e., fuchsite) commonly occurs in metamorphosed ultramafic rocks and dissolution rates may be comparable to other common Cr(III)-bearing phyllosilicates and clays. Here, we examine the formation of Cr(VI) related to Cr(III)-muscovite and birnessite (i.e., acid birnessite) interactions with and without humic matter (HM) via batch experiments. Experimentally, the fastest rate of Cr(VI) production involving Cr(III)-muscovite was 3.8 × 10-1 μM h-1 (pH 3 without HM). Kinetically, Cr(III)-muscovite provides a major pathway for Cr(VI) formation and Cr(VI) production rates may exceed those involving chromite depending on pH, available mineral surface areas in solution, and the abundance of Cr(III) present. However, when HM is introduced to the system, Cr(VI) production rates decrease by as much as 80%. This highlights that HM strongly decreases but may not completely suppress the formation and mobilization of Cr(VI). A Sri Lankan serpentine soil was utilized to provide context with regards to the experimental results. Despite Cr(VI) in the soil solids and Cr(VI) formation being favorable from Cr(III)-bearing minerals, no detectable Cr(VI) was released into soil solutions potentially due to the abundance of HM. Overall, the dynamic interactions of Cr(III)-bearing silicates and birnessite provide a kinetically favorable route of Cr(VI) formation which is tempered by humic matter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883497563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883497563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/es4015025

DO - 10.1021/es4015025

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 9722

EP - 9729

JO - Environmental Science and Technology

JF - Environmental Science and Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 17

ER -