Current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States and policy implications for Korea

Jin Suk Kim, Su Hyun Oh, Jae Wook Choi, Seok Yeong Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The main objective of this study to propose an implementation about telemedicine policy in Korea through analyzing current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States. To achieve the result, three types of data sets were used to draw conclusions; 1) status of insured service of telemedicine in each state, 2) physician practice standards related to telemedicine, and 3) licensure. Analyzed results indicated differentiation in insured status of telemedicine service among private insurance parity law, medicaid coverage parity law, and state employee health plan parity in each states. Only two states provide insured service of telemedicine without any limits or certain conditions. Other states have a strict regulation or coverage condition about providing insurance. Each states also apply rigorous standards to telemedicine providers about physician practice standards and licensure. Some states restrict telemedicine itself or provide strict regulation process of telemedicine in Physician-patient encounter. Also, the most strict type 'full state license' and 'consulting exemptions (applied in certain condition)' are applied in most of states. On the basis of study result, environmental and conditional requirement implementation in application of telemedicine policy in Korea is provided in conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)923-932
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Korean Medical Association
Volume58
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Korea
Licensure
Parity
Insurance
Physicians
State Health Plans
Medicaid
Occupational Health

Keywords

  • Parity laws
  • Physician licensing
  • Telemedicine policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States and policy implications for Korea. / Kim, Jin Suk; Oh, Su Hyun; Choi, Jae Wook; Kim, Seok Yeong.

In: Journal of the Korean Medical Association, Vol. 58, No. 10, 01.01.2015, p. 923-932.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51232192bb54452fb2f51bd1a5d1308e,
title = "Current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States and policy implications for Korea",
abstract = "The main objective of this study to propose an implementation about telemedicine policy in Korea through analyzing current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States. To achieve the result, three types of data sets were used to draw conclusions; 1) status of insured service of telemedicine in each state, 2) physician practice standards related to telemedicine, and 3) licensure. Analyzed results indicated differentiation in insured status of telemedicine service among private insurance parity law, medicaid coverage parity law, and state employee health plan parity in each states. Only two states provide insured service of telemedicine without any limits or certain conditions. Other states have a strict regulation or coverage condition about providing insurance. Each states also apply rigorous standards to telemedicine providers about physician practice standards and licensure. Some states restrict telemedicine itself or provide strict regulation process of telemedicine in Physician-patient encounter. Also, the most strict type 'full state license' and 'consulting exemptions (applied in certain condition)' are applied in most of states. On the basis of study result, environmental and conditional requirement implementation in application of telemedicine policy in Korea is provided in conclusion.",
keywords = "Parity laws, Physician licensing, Telemedicine policy",
author = "Kim, {Jin Suk} and Oh, {Su Hyun} and Choi, {Jae Wook} and Kim, {Seok Yeong}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5124/jkma.2015.58.10.923",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "923--932",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Medical Association",
issn = "1975-8456",
publisher = "Korean Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States and policy implications for Korea

AU - Kim, Jin Suk

AU - Oh, Su Hyun

AU - Choi, Jae Wook

AU - Kim, Seok Yeong

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The main objective of this study to propose an implementation about telemedicine policy in Korea through analyzing current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States. To achieve the result, three types of data sets were used to draw conclusions; 1) status of insured service of telemedicine in each state, 2) physician practice standards related to telemedicine, and 3) licensure. Analyzed results indicated differentiation in insured status of telemedicine service among private insurance parity law, medicaid coverage parity law, and state employee health plan parity in each states. Only two states provide insured service of telemedicine without any limits or certain conditions. Other states have a strict regulation or coverage condition about providing insurance. Each states also apply rigorous standards to telemedicine providers about physician practice standards and licensure. Some states restrict telemedicine itself or provide strict regulation process of telemedicine in Physician-patient encounter. Also, the most strict type 'full state license' and 'consulting exemptions (applied in certain condition)' are applied in most of states. On the basis of study result, environmental and conditional requirement implementation in application of telemedicine policy in Korea is provided in conclusion.

AB - The main objective of this study to propose an implementation about telemedicine policy in Korea through analyzing current status of state telemedicine policy in the United States. To achieve the result, three types of data sets were used to draw conclusions; 1) status of insured service of telemedicine in each state, 2) physician practice standards related to telemedicine, and 3) licensure. Analyzed results indicated differentiation in insured status of telemedicine service among private insurance parity law, medicaid coverage parity law, and state employee health plan parity in each states. Only two states provide insured service of telemedicine without any limits or certain conditions. Other states have a strict regulation or coverage condition about providing insurance. Each states also apply rigorous standards to telemedicine providers about physician practice standards and licensure. Some states restrict telemedicine itself or provide strict regulation process of telemedicine in Physician-patient encounter. Also, the most strict type 'full state license' and 'consulting exemptions (applied in certain condition)' are applied in most of states. On the basis of study result, environmental and conditional requirement implementation in application of telemedicine policy in Korea is provided in conclusion.

KW - Parity laws

KW - Physician licensing

KW - Telemedicine policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946012850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946012850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5124/jkma.2015.58.10.923

DO - 10.5124/jkma.2015.58.10.923

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 923

EP - 932

JO - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

SN - 1975-8456

IS - 10

ER -