Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes knee

Hong Chul Lim, Ji Hoon Bae, Sang Heon Song, Young Eun Park, Seung Ju Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many surgical techniques, including microfracture, periosteal and perichondral grafts, chondrocyte transplantation, and osteochondral grafts, have been studied in an attempt to restore damaged articular cartilage. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to repair isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. Questions/purposes: We compared postoperative functional outcomes, followup MRI appearance, and arthroscopic examination after microfracture (MF), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Methods: We prospectively investigated 30 knees with MF, 22 with OAT, and 18 with ACI. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 5 years; range, 3-10 years). We included only patients with isolated cartilage defects and without other knee injuries. The three procedures were compared in terms of function using the Lysholm knee evaluation scale, Tegner activity scale, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score; modified Outerbridge cartilage grades using MRI; and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) repair grade using arthroscopy. Results: All three procedures showed improvement in functional scores. There were no differences in functional scores and postoperative MRI grades among the groups. Arthroscopy at 1 year showed excellent or good results in 80% after MF, 82% after OAT, and 80% after ACI. Our study did not show a clear benefit of either ACI or OAT over MF. Conclusions: Owing to a lack of superiority of any one treatment, we believe MF is a reasonable option as a first-line therapy given its ease and affordability relative to ACI or OAT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2261-2267
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume470
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Stress Fractures
Articular Cartilage
Chondrocytes
Autografts
Knee
Transplantation
Cartilage
Arthroscopy
Therapeutics
Special Hospital
Transplants
Knee Injuries
Autologous Transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes knee. / Lim, Hong Chul; Bae, Ji Hoon; Song, Sang Heon; Park, Young Eun; Kim, Seung Ju.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 470, No. 8, 01.08.2012, p. 2261-2267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lim, Hong Chul ; Bae, Ji Hoon ; Song, Sang Heon ; Park, Young Eun ; Kim, Seung Ju. / Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes knee. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2012 ; Vol. 470, No. 8. pp. 2261-2267.
@article{7a11144e646a45e5a649e9574d2624c8,
title = "Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes knee",
abstract = "Background: Many surgical techniques, including microfracture, periosteal and perichondral grafts, chondrocyte transplantation, and osteochondral grafts, have been studied in an attempt to restore damaged articular cartilage. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to repair isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. Questions/purposes: We compared postoperative functional outcomes, followup MRI appearance, and arthroscopic examination after microfracture (MF), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Methods: We prospectively investigated 30 knees with MF, 22 with OAT, and 18 with ACI. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 5 years; range, 3-10 years). We included only patients with isolated cartilage defects and without other knee injuries. The three procedures were compared in terms of function using the Lysholm knee evaluation scale, Tegner activity scale, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score; modified Outerbridge cartilage grades using MRI; and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) repair grade using arthroscopy. Results: All three procedures showed improvement in functional scores. There were no differences in functional scores and postoperative MRI grades among the groups. Arthroscopy at 1 year showed excellent or good results in 80{\%} after MF, 82{\%} after OAT, and 80{\%} after ACI. Our study did not show a clear benefit of either ACI or OAT over MF. Conclusions: Owing to a lack of superiority of any one treatment, we believe MF is a reasonable option as a first-line therapy given its ease and affordability relative to ACI or OAT.",
author = "Lim, {Hong Chul} and Bae, {Ji Hoon} and Song, {Sang Heon} and Park, {Young Eun} and Kim, {Seung Ju}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11999-012-2304-9",
language = "English",
volume = "470",
pages = "2261--2267",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes knee

AU - Lim, Hong Chul

AU - Bae, Ji Hoon

AU - Song, Sang Heon

AU - Park, Young Eun

AU - Kim, Seung Ju

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - Background: Many surgical techniques, including microfracture, periosteal and perichondral grafts, chondrocyte transplantation, and osteochondral grafts, have been studied in an attempt to restore damaged articular cartilage. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to repair isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. Questions/purposes: We compared postoperative functional outcomes, followup MRI appearance, and arthroscopic examination after microfracture (MF), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Methods: We prospectively investigated 30 knees with MF, 22 with OAT, and 18 with ACI. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 5 years; range, 3-10 years). We included only patients with isolated cartilage defects and without other knee injuries. The three procedures were compared in terms of function using the Lysholm knee evaluation scale, Tegner activity scale, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score; modified Outerbridge cartilage grades using MRI; and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) repair grade using arthroscopy. Results: All three procedures showed improvement in functional scores. There were no differences in functional scores and postoperative MRI grades among the groups. Arthroscopy at 1 year showed excellent or good results in 80% after MF, 82% after OAT, and 80% after ACI. Our study did not show a clear benefit of either ACI or OAT over MF. Conclusions: Owing to a lack of superiority of any one treatment, we believe MF is a reasonable option as a first-line therapy given its ease and affordability relative to ACI or OAT.

AB - Background: Many surgical techniques, including microfracture, periosteal and perichondral grafts, chondrocyte transplantation, and osteochondral grafts, have been studied in an attempt to restore damaged articular cartilage. However, there is no consensus regarding the best method to repair isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. Questions/purposes: We compared postoperative functional outcomes, followup MRI appearance, and arthroscopic examination after microfracture (MF), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Methods: We prospectively investigated 30 knees with MF, 22 with OAT, and 18 with ACI. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 5 years; range, 3-10 years). We included only patients with isolated cartilage defects and without other knee injuries. The three procedures were compared in terms of function using the Lysholm knee evaluation scale, Tegner activity scale, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score; modified Outerbridge cartilage grades using MRI; and International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) repair grade using arthroscopy. Results: All three procedures showed improvement in functional scores. There were no differences in functional scores and postoperative MRI grades among the groups. Arthroscopy at 1 year showed excellent or good results in 80% after MF, 82% after OAT, and 80% after ACI. Our study did not show a clear benefit of either ACI or OAT over MF. Conclusions: Owing to a lack of superiority of any one treatment, we believe MF is a reasonable option as a first-line therapy given its ease and affordability relative to ACI or OAT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866451258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866451258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11999-012-2304-9

DO - 10.1007/s11999-012-2304-9

M3 - Article

VL - 470

SP - 2261

EP - 2267

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 8

ER -