Dermis graft for wound coverage

Seung-Kyu Han, Tae Hwan Yoon, Jung Bae Kim, Woo-Kyung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The two major concerns in skin grafting are poor color match in the recipient sites and donor-site morbidity. A dermis graft, which is a de-epithelialized split-thickness skin graft, was used to minimize these problems. The important aspects of this method involve the immediate return of the epidermis to the donor site and the restoration of the epidermis portion of the recipient site by inducing epithelization from the adjacent skin. METHODS: From April of 2001 to March of 2004, the dermis graft was applied to 53 patients. A regular split-thickness skin graft procedure was performed in 33 patients. Healing time, scar condition, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: The wounds of the dermis (n = 53) and skin grafts (n = 33) had re-epithelialized after 15.5 ± 1.9 and 11.8 ± 1.6 days, respectively. Scarring on the recipient site of the dermis graft (n = 26) was less severe than that on the regular skin graft (n = 20) in terms of pigmentation, height, and vascularity (p < 0.05). No significant difference in pliability was detected. Patient satisfaction with the dermis graft group was also better. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 53) and skin graft (n = 33) healed within 7.5 ± 0.8 and 12.8 ± 1.1 days, respectively. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 26) were also superior to those of the skin graft (n = 20) in terms of scar quality and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The dermis graft technique for wound coverage is superior both aesthetically and functionally to the regular skin graft technique in both the recipient and donor sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-172
Number of pages7
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Dermis
Transplants
Wounds and Injuries
Skin
Tissue Donors
Patient Satisfaction
Cicatrix
Epidermis
Skin Transplantation
Pigmentation
Pliability
Color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Dermis graft for wound coverage. / Han, Seung-Kyu; Yoon, Tae Hwan; Kim, Jung Bae; Kim, Woo-Kyung.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 120, No. 1, 01.07.2007, p. 166-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, Seung-Kyu ; Yoon, Tae Hwan ; Kim, Jung Bae ; Kim, Woo-Kyung. / Dermis graft for wound coverage. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 120, No. 1. pp. 166-172.
@article{db287c54abe744c4a535130f206f619a,
title = "Dermis graft for wound coverage",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The two major concerns in skin grafting are poor color match in the recipient sites and donor-site morbidity. A dermis graft, which is a de-epithelialized split-thickness skin graft, was used to minimize these problems. The important aspects of this method involve the immediate return of the epidermis to the donor site and the restoration of the epidermis portion of the recipient site by inducing epithelization from the adjacent skin. METHODS: From April of 2001 to March of 2004, the dermis graft was applied to 53 patients. A regular split-thickness skin graft procedure was performed in 33 patients. Healing time, scar condition, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: The wounds of the dermis (n = 53) and skin grafts (n = 33) had re-epithelialized after 15.5 ± 1.9 and 11.8 ± 1.6 days, respectively. Scarring on the recipient site of the dermis graft (n = 26) was less severe than that on the regular skin graft (n = 20) in terms of pigmentation, height, and vascularity (p < 0.05). No significant difference in pliability was detected. Patient satisfaction with the dermis graft group was also better. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 53) and skin graft (n = 33) healed within 7.5 ± 0.8 and 12.8 ± 1.1 days, respectively. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 26) were also superior to those of the skin graft (n = 20) in terms of scar quality and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The dermis graft technique for wound coverage is superior both aesthetically and functionally to the regular skin graft technique in both the recipient and donor sites.",
author = "Seung-Kyu Han and Yoon, {Tae Hwan} and Kim, {Jung Bae} and Woo-Kyung Kim",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.prs.0000263536.55077.7e",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "166--172",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dermis graft for wound coverage

AU - Han, Seung-Kyu

AU - Yoon, Tae Hwan

AU - Kim, Jung Bae

AU - Kim, Woo-Kyung

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The two major concerns in skin grafting are poor color match in the recipient sites and donor-site morbidity. A dermis graft, which is a de-epithelialized split-thickness skin graft, was used to minimize these problems. The important aspects of this method involve the immediate return of the epidermis to the donor site and the restoration of the epidermis portion of the recipient site by inducing epithelization from the adjacent skin. METHODS: From April of 2001 to March of 2004, the dermis graft was applied to 53 patients. A regular split-thickness skin graft procedure was performed in 33 patients. Healing time, scar condition, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: The wounds of the dermis (n = 53) and skin grafts (n = 33) had re-epithelialized after 15.5 ± 1.9 and 11.8 ± 1.6 days, respectively. Scarring on the recipient site of the dermis graft (n = 26) was less severe than that on the regular skin graft (n = 20) in terms of pigmentation, height, and vascularity (p < 0.05). No significant difference in pliability was detected. Patient satisfaction with the dermis graft group was also better. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 53) and skin graft (n = 33) healed within 7.5 ± 0.8 and 12.8 ± 1.1 days, respectively. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 26) were also superior to those of the skin graft (n = 20) in terms of scar quality and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The dermis graft technique for wound coverage is superior both aesthetically and functionally to the regular skin graft technique in both the recipient and donor sites.

AB - BACKGROUND: The two major concerns in skin grafting are poor color match in the recipient sites and donor-site morbidity. A dermis graft, which is a de-epithelialized split-thickness skin graft, was used to minimize these problems. The important aspects of this method involve the immediate return of the epidermis to the donor site and the restoration of the epidermis portion of the recipient site by inducing epithelization from the adjacent skin. METHODS: From April of 2001 to March of 2004, the dermis graft was applied to 53 patients. A regular split-thickness skin graft procedure was performed in 33 patients. Healing time, scar condition, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: The wounds of the dermis (n = 53) and skin grafts (n = 33) had re-epithelialized after 15.5 ± 1.9 and 11.8 ± 1.6 days, respectively. Scarring on the recipient site of the dermis graft (n = 26) was less severe than that on the regular skin graft (n = 20) in terms of pigmentation, height, and vascularity (p < 0.05). No significant difference in pliability was detected. Patient satisfaction with the dermis graft group was also better. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 53) and skin graft (n = 33) healed within 7.5 ± 0.8 and 12.8 ± 1.1 days, respectively. The donor sites of the dermis graft (n = 26) were also superior to those of the skin graft (n = 20) in terms of scar quality and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The dermis graft technique for wound coverage is superior both aesthetically and functionally to the regular skin graft technique in both the recipient and donor sites.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250789653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250789653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.prs.0000263536.55077.7e

DO - 10.1097/01.prs.0000263536.55077.7e

M3 - Article

C2 - 17572559

AN - SCOPUS:34250789653

VL - 120

SP - 166

EP - 172

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 1

ER -