Design and evaluation of a hand-held trackball-based touch-haptic interface for providing directional feedback

Minwoo Choi, Myungho Lee, Jeonghyun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, we present a design and an evaluation of a hand-held, trackball-based, touch-haptic interface, named 'Touchball', for conveying directional cues. By the nature of the trackball mechanism, the device provides flexibility in terms of directional degrees of freedom compared with conventional vibro-tactile devices. It also has the advantage of a direct transfer of force feedback through frictional touch (leveraging on human's high skin sensitivity), thus requiring only a relatively small amount of inertia by the actuator. This leads to a compact hand-held design appropriate for mobile and 3D interactive applications. We first conducted psychophysical experiments to discover the detection thresholds and measure the perceived amount of directional force feedback. In addition, we conducted a performance and usability test, comparing the Touchball to a vibro-tactile (another touch-based) and aural (another modality) feedback device for an actual application, namely a navigational guide. Experimental results have shown that while both the Touchball and vibro-tactile devices produced comparable task completion time to that with aural feedback, their accuracies were significantly lower. The usability, in most categories, was higher in the order of the sound feedback, Touchball, then vibro-tactile feedback with statistically significant differences. To convey more than just on-off information through tactility such as directions, the vibro-tactile device requires relatively many vibrators and contact points, whereas the Touchball is a more compact and equally effective but with higher usability (e.g. mental load, ease of use, naturalness, etc.). Thus, Touchball offers a viable or even better alternative to a single vibrator or grid-based tactile feedback device especially as a supplementary modality device (to the visual or aural centric interface).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-171
Number of pages13
JournalInteracting with Computers
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Nov 20

Fingerprint

Haptic interfaces
Feedback
Vibrators
Point contacts
Conveying
Skin
Actuators
Acoustic waves

Keywords

  • haptic devices
  • interaction devices
  • novel interaction paradigms
  • user studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Software

Cite this

Design and evaluation of a hand-held trackball-based touch-haptic interface for providing directional feedback. / Choi, Minwoo; Lee, Myungho; Kim, Jeonghyun.

In: Interacting with Computers, Vol. 27, No. 2, 20.11.2012, p. 159-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dde66e48ab224dc5b69a74a16ae218d7,
title = "Design and evaluation of a hand-held trackball-based touch-haptic interface for providing directional feedback",
abstract = "In this article, we present a design and an evaluation of a hand-held, trackball-based, touch-haptic interface, named 'Touchball', for conveying directional cues. By the nature of the trackball mechanism, the device provides flexibility in terms of directional degrees of freedom compared with conventional vibro-tactile devices. It also has the advantage of a direct transfer of force feedback through frictional touch (leveraging on human's high skin sensitivity), thus requiring only a relatively small amount of inertia by the actuator. This leads to a compact hand-held design appropriate for mobile and 3D interactive applications. We first conducted psychophysical experiments to discover the detection thresholds and measure the perceived amount of directional force feedback. In addition, we conducted a performance and usability test, comparing the Touchball to a vibro-tactile (another touch-based) and aural (another modality) feedback device for an actual application, namely a navigational guide. Experimental results have shown that while both the Touchball and vibro-tactile devices produced comparable task completion time to that with aural feedback, their accuracies were significantly lower. The usability, in most categories, was higher in the order of the sound feedback, Touchball, then vibro-tactile feedback with statistically significant differences. To convey more than just on-off information through tactility such as directions, the vibro-tactile device requires relatively many vibrators and contact points, whereas the Touchball is a more compact and equally effective but with higher usability (e.g. mental load, ease of use, naturalness, etc.). Thus, Touchball offers a viable or even better alternative to a single vibrator or grid-based tactile feedback device especially as a supplementary modality device (to the visual or aural centric interface).",
keywords = "haptic devices, interaction devices, novel interaction paradigms, user studies",
author = "Minwoo Choi and Myungho Lee and Jeonghyun Kim",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1093/iwc/iwt062",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "159--171",
journal = "Interacting with Computers",
issn = "0953-5438",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design and evaluation of a hand-held trackball-based touch-haptic interface for providing directional feedback

AU - Choi, Minwoo

AU - Lee, Myungho

AU - Kim, Jeonghyun

PY - 2012/11/20

Y1 - 2012/11/20

N2 - In this article, we present a design and an evaluation of a hand-held, trackball-based, touch-haptic interface, named 'Touchball', for conveying directional cues. By the nature of the trackball mechanism, the device provides flexibility in terms of directional degrees of freedom compared with conventional vibro-tactile devices. It also has the advantage of a direct transfer of force feedback through frictional touch (leveraging on human's high skin sensitivity), thus requiring only a relatively small amount of inertia by the actuator. This leads to a compact hand-held design appropriate for mobile and 3D interactive applications. We first conducted psychophysical experiments to discover the detection thresholds and measure the perceived amount of directional force feedback. In addition, we conducted a performance and usability test, comparing the Touchball to a vibro-tactile (another touch-based) and aural (another modality) feedback device for an actual application, namely a navigational guide. Experimental results have shown that while both the Touchball and vibro-tactile devices produced comparable task completion time to that with aural feedback, their accuracies were significantly lower. The usability, in most categories, was higher in the order of the sound feedback, Touchball, then vibro-tactile feedback with statistically significant differences. To convey more than just on-off information through tactility such as directions, the vibro-tactile device requires relatively many vibrators and contact points, whereas the Touchball is a more compact and equally effective but with higher usability (e.g. mental load, ease of use, naturalness, etc.). Thus, Touchball offers a viable or even better alternative to a single vibrator or grid-based tactile feedback device especially as a supplementary modality device (to the visual or aural centric interface).

AB - In this article, we present a design and an evaluation of a hand-held, trackball-based, touch-haptic interface, named 'Touchball', for conveying directional cues. By the nature of the trackball mechanism, the device provides flexibility in terms of directional degrees of freedom compared with conventional vibro-tactile devices. It also has the advantage of a direct transfer of force feedback through frictional touch (leveraging on human's high skin sensitivity), thus requiring only a relatively small amount of inertia by the actuator. This leads to a compact hand-held design appropriate for mobile and 3D interactive applications. We first conducted psychophysical experiments to discover the detection thresholds and measure the perceived amount of directional force feedback. In addition, we conducted a performance and usability test, comparing the Touchball to a vibro-tactile (another touch-based) and aural (another modality) feedback device for an actual application, namely a navigational guide. Experimental results have shown that while both the Touchball and vibro-tactile devices produced comparable task completion time to that with aural feedback, their accuracies were significantly lower. The usability, in most categories, was higher in the order of the sound feedback, Touchball, then vibro-tactile feedback with statistically significant differences. To convey more than just on-off information through tactility such as directions, the vibro-tactile device requires relatively many vibrators and contact points, whereas the Touchball is a more compact and equally effective but with higher usability (e.g. mental load, ease of use, naturalness, etc.). Thus, Touchball offers a viable or even better alternative to a single vibrator or grid-based tactile feedback device especially as a supplementary modality device (to the visual or aural centric interface).

KW - haptic devices

KW - interaction devices

KW - novel interaction paradigms

KW - user studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928333555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928333555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/iwc/iwt062

DO - 10.1093/iwc/iwt062

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928333555

VL - 27

SP - 159

EP - 171

JO - Interacting with Computers

JF - Interacting with Computers

SN - 0953-5438

IS - 2

ER -