Detailed comparison of the operational characteristics of energy-conserving HVAC systems during the cooling season

Chul Ho Kim, Seung Eon Lee, Kwang Ho Lee, Kang Soo Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To provide useful information concerning energy-conserving heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, this study used EnergyPlus to analyze in detail their operational characteristics and energy performance. This study also aimed to understand the features of the systems under consideration by investigating the dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, and airflow rate at major nodes in each system's schematic. Furthermore, we analyzed the indoor environment created by each HVAC system, as well as examining the cooling energy consumptions and CO2 emissions. The HVAC systems selected for this study are the variable air volume (VAV) commonly used in office buildings (base-case model), constant air volume (CAV), under-floor air distribution (UFAD), and active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS). For the same indoor set-point temperature, the CAV's supply airflow was the highest, and VAV and UFAD were operated by varying the airflow rate according to the change of the space thermal load. ACB with DOAS was analyzed as being able to perform air conditioning only with the supply airflow constantly fixed at a minimum outdoor air volume. The primary cooling energy was increased by about 23.3% by applying CAV, compared to VAV. When using the UFAD and ACB with DOAS, cooling energy was reduced by 11.3% and 23.1% compared with VAV, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4160
JournalEnergies
Volume12
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Oct 31

Fingerprint

Ventilation
Conditioning
Air conditioning
Cooling
Heating
Air
Energy
Relative Humidity
Point Sets
Energy Consumption
Office buildings
Schematic diagrams
Thermal load
Cooling systems
Vertex of a graph
Atmospheric humidity
Energy utilization

Keywords

  • Active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS)
  • CO emissions
  • Energy-conserving HVAC systems
  • EnergyPlus
  • Primary energy consumption
  • Underfloor air distribution (UFAD)
  • Variable air volume (VAV)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Control and Optimization
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Detailed comparison of the operational characteristics of energy-conserving HVAC systems during the cooling season. / Kim, Chul Ho; Lee, Seung Eon; Lee, Kwang Ho; Kim, Kang Soo.

In: Energies, Vol. 12, No. 21, 4160, 31.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4da3628b940d4a92a5d9c52790728519,
title = "Detailed comparison of the operational characteristics of energy-conserving HVAC systems during the cooling season",
abstract = "To provide useful information concerning energy-conserving heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, this study used EnergyPlus to analyze in detail their operational characteristics and energy performance. This study also aimed to understand the features of the systems under consideration by investigating the dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, and airflow rate at major nodes in each system's schematic. Furthermore, we analyzed the indoor environment created by each HVAC system, as well as examining the cooling energy consumptions and CO2 emissions. The HVAC systems selected for this study are the variable air volume (VAV) commonly used in office buildings (base-case model), constant air volume (CAV), under-floor air distribution (UFAD), and active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS). For the same indoor set-point temperature, the CAV's supply airflow was the highest, and VAV and UFAD were operated by varying the airflow rate according to the change of the space thermal load. ACB with DOAS was analyzed as being able to perform air conditioning only with the supply airflow constantly fixed at a minimum outdoor air volume. The primary cooling energy was increased by about 23.3{\%} by applying CAV, compared to VAV. When using the UFAD and ACB with DOAS, cooling energy was reduced by 11.3{\%} and 23.1{\%} compared with VAV, respectively.",
keywords = "Active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS), CO emissions, Energy-conserving HVAC systems, EnergyPlus, Primary energy consumption, Underfloor air distribution (UFAD), Variable air volume (VAV)",
author = "Kim, {Chul Ho} and Lee, {Seung Eon} and Lee, {Kwang Ho} and Kim, {Kang Soo}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3390/en12214160",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Energies",
issn = "1996-1073",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detailed comparison of the operational characteristics of energy-conserving HVAC systems during the cooling season

AU - Kim, Chul Ho

AU - Lee, Seung Eon

AU - Lee, Kwang Ho

AU - Kim, Kang Soo

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - To provide useful information concerning energy-conserving heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, this study used EnergyPlus to analyze in detail their operational characteristics and energy performance. This study also aimed to understand the features of the systems under consideration by investigating the dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, and airflow rate at major nodes in each system's schematic. Furthermore, we analyzed the indoor environment created by each HVAC system, as well as examining the cooling energy consumptions and CO2 emissions. The HVAC systems selected for this study are the variable air volume (VAV) commonly used in office buildings (base-case model), constant air volume (CAV), under-floor air distribution (UFAD), and active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS). For the same indoor set-point temperature, the CAV's supply airflow was the highest, and VAV and UFAD were operated by varying the airflow rate according to the change of the space thermal load. ACB with DOAS was analyzed as being able to perform air conditioning only with the supply airflow constantly fixed at a minimum outdoor air volume. The primary cooling energy was increased by about 23.3% by applying CAV, compared to VAV. When using the UFAD and ACB with DOAS, cooling energy was reduced by 11.3% and 23.1% compared with VAV, respectively.

AB - To provide useful information concerning energy-conserving heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, this study used EnergyPlus to analyze in detail their operational characteristics and energy performance. This study also aimed to understand the features of the systems under consideration by investigating the dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, and airflow rate at major nodes in each system's schematic. Furthermore, we analyzed the indoor environment created by each HVAC system, as well as examining the cooling energy consumptions and CO2 emissions. The HVAC systems selected for this study are the variable air volume (VAV) commonly used in office buildings (base-case model), constant air volume (CAV), under-floor air distribution (UFAD), and active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS). For the same indoor set-point temperature, the CAV's supply airflow was the highest, and VAV and UFAD were operated by varying the airflow rate according to the change of the space thermal load. ACB with DOAS was analyzed as being able to perform air conditioning only with the supply airflow constantly fixed at a minimum outdoor air volume. The primary cooling energy was increased by about 23.3% by applying CAV, compared to VAV. When using the UFAD and ACB with DOAS, cooling energy was reduced by 11.3% and 23.1% compared with VAV, respectively.

KW - Active chilled beam (ACB) with dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS)

KW - CO emissions

KW - Energy-conserving HVAC systems

KW - EnergyPlus

KW - Primary energy consumption

KW - Underfloor air distribution (UFAD)

KW - Variable air volume (VAV)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075584488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075584488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/en12214160

DO - 10.3390/en12214160

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075584488

VL - 12

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 21

M1 - 4160

ER -