Detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma: Computed tomography versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography

Dong Hoon Lee, Won Jun Kang, Hyung Suk Seo, Eunhee Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Kyu Ri Son, Dong Gyu Na

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is more accurate than CT for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and to determine the relationship between the CT features and PET-CT findings of metastatic nodes. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with recurrent PTC underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and PET-CT before surgery. We retrospectively evaluated CECT and PET-CT images to determine the presence of metastatic nodes by level-by-level analysis. The CT findings of the PET-CT results that were positive and negative for metastatic nodes were compared. RESULTS: Metastatic nodes were found at 28 (78%) of 36 neck levels surgically explored. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CECT for the detection of metastatic nodes were 75.0%, 87.5%, and 77.8%, respectively, and those of PET-CT were 35.7%, 87.5%, and 48.6%, respectively, by level-by-level analysis. No significant difference in the CT features was found between the PET-CT findings positive and negative for metastatic nodes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography is more sensitive and accurate than PET-CT for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in recurrent PTC. No significant relationship was found between the CT features and the PET-CT findings of the metastatic nodes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-810
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lymph Nodes
Tomography
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Papillary Thyroid cancer
Neck
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • CT
  • Lymph node metastasis
  • Papillary thyroid cancer
  • PET-CT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma : Computed tomography versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography. / Lee, Dong Hoon; Kang, Won Jun; Seo, Hyung Suk; Kim, Eunhee; Kim, Ji Hoon; Son, Kyu Ri; Na, Dong Gyu.

In: Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 33, No. 5, 01.09.2009, p. 805-810.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{900df2c6a2a440f79e990e5adc8604b5,
title = "Detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma: Computed tomography versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is more accurate than CT for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and to determine the relationship between the CT features and PET-CT findings of metastatic nodes. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with recurrent PTC underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and PET-CT before surgery. We retrospectively evaluated CECT and PET-CT images to determine the presence of metastatic nodes by level-by-level analysis. The CT findings of the PET-CT results that were positive and negative for metastatic nodes were compared. RESULTS: Metastatic nodes were found at 28 (78{\%}) of 36 neck levels surgically explored. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CECT for the detection of metastatic nodes were 75.0{\%}, 87.5{\%}, and 77.8{\%}, respectively, and those of PET-CT were 35.7{\%}, 87.5{\%}, and 48.6{\%}, respectively, by level-by-level analysis. No significant difference in the CT features was found between the PET-CT findings positive and negative for metastatic nodes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography is more sensitive and accurate than PET-CT for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in recurrent PTC. No significant relationship was found between the CT features and the PET-CT findings of the metastatic nodes.",
keywords = "CT, Lymph node metastasis, Papillary thyroid cancer, PET-CT",
author = "Lee, {Dong Hoon} and Kang, {Won Jun} and Seo, {Hyung Suk} and Eunhee Kim and Kim, {Ji Hoon} and Son, {Kyu Ri} and Na, {Dong Gyu}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/RCT.0b013e31818fb3f1",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "805--810",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography",
issn = "0363-8715",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma

T2 - Computed tomography versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography

AU - Lee, Dong Hoon

AU - Kang, Won Jun

AU - Seo, Hyung Suk

AU - Kim, Eunhee

AU - Kim, Ji Hoon

AU - Son, Kyu Ri

AU - Na, Dong Gyu

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is more accurate than CT for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and to determine the relationship between the CT features and PET-CT findings of metastatic nodes. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with recurrent PTC underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and PET-CT before surgery. We retrospectively evaluated CECT and PET-CT images to determine the presence of metastatic nodes by level-by-level analysis. The CT findings of the PET-CT results that were positive and negative for metastatic nodes were compared. RESULTS: Metastatic nodes were found at 28 (78%) of 36 neck levels surgically explored. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CECT for the detection of metastatic nodes were 75.0%, 87.5%, and 77.8%, respectively, and those of PET-CT were 35.7%, 87.5%, and 48.6%, respectively, by level-by-level analysis. No significant difference in the CT features was found between the PET-CT findings positive and negative for metastatic nodes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography is more sensitive and accurate than PET-CT for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in recurrent PTC. No significant relationship was found between the CT features and the PET-CT findings of the metastatic nodes.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is more accurate than CT for detecting metastatic cervical lymph nodes in recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and to determine the relationship between the CT features and PET-CT findings of metastatic nodes. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with recurrent PTC underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and PET-CT before surgery. We retrospectively evaluated CECT and PET-CT images to determine the presence of metastatic nodes by level-by-level analysis. The CT findings of the PET-CT results that were positive and negative for metastatic nodes were compared. RESULTS: Metastatic nodes were found at 28 (78%) of 36 neck levels surgically explored. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CECT for the detection of metastatic nodes were 75.0%, 87.5%, and 77.8%, respectively, and those of PET-CT were 35.7%, 87.5%, and 48.6%, respectively, by level-by-level analysis. No significant difference in the CT features was found between the PET-CT findings positive and negative for metastatic nodes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography is more sensitive and accurate than PET-CT for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in recurrent PTC. No significant relationship was found between the CT features and the PET-CT findings of the metastatic nodes.

KW - CT

KW - Lymph node metastasis

KW - Papillary thyroid cancer

KW - PET-CT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349757173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349757173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31818fb3f1

DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31818fb3f1

M3 - Article

C2 - 19820516

AN - SCOPUS:70349757173

VL - 33

SP - 805

EP - 810

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

SN - 0363-8715

IS - 5

ER -