Development of an effective tool for risk communication about food safety issues after the Fukushima nuclear accident

What should be considered?

Tae Jin Cho, Nam Hee Kim, Yoon Ji Hong, Byoung Il Park, Hee Sung Kim, Hyang Gi Lee, Min Kyung Song, Min-Suk Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the Fukushima nuclear accident (FNA) in 2011 led to strong public anxiety about radioactive contamination of foods, the most appropriate way to communicate this risk has been poorly researched. We sought to design, develop, evaluate, and optimize an effective risk communication (RC) tool for food consumers after the FNA. To design this tool, a classical systematic qualitative research framework that consisted of formative evaluation, development of a pilot RC tool, and outcome evaluation was applied. The formative evaluation consisted of focus group interview (FGI) with food consumers: its aim was to identify the major risk messages. Due to the low knowledge base of the food consumers and the absence of a credible existing information source, a pilot RC tool was developed. An educational book was selected as the most effective RC vehicle. The FGI results were reflected in the content of the book, which was presented in a ‘frequently asked questions and answers’ format. To ensure ready comprehensibility of the book, the scientific words were paraphrased and visual aids were employed. To ensure credibility of the RC, evidence supporting its statements was provided and it was made clear that the RC was a collaborative message from multiple risk communicators (consumer organizations, government bodies, and academia). Outcome evaluation with a consumer survey showed that the RC tool effectively increased the knowledge base of food consumers and relieved their anxieties. This study suggests that in the event of another nuclear accident, food safety RCs should meet the following key requirements: 1) the RC should send a clear message that reassures food consumers that the fatal risk is well controlled, which will reduce public fear and outrage; 2) the RC should improve the knowledge base of food consumers about food safety by providing appropriate education; and 3) the RC should be produced via multi-institutional cooperation so that the credibility of risk communicators is rebuilt. Our results may help the planning of an effective radiological RC strategy for food consumers, thereby preventing misunderstandings and relieving food consumers of unnecessarily severe anxiety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-26
Number of pages10
JournalFood Control
Volume79
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Fukushima Nuclear Accident
risk communication
Food Safety
accidents
food safety
Communication
risk communicators
Food
anxiety
Knowledge Bases
focus groups
interviews
Anxiety
visual aids
Focus Groups
consumer surveys
Radioactive Food Contamination
Consumer Organizations
food contamination
qualitative analysis

Keywords

  • Consumer survey
  • Educational book
  • Focus group interview
  • Food safety
  • Fukushima nuclear accident
  • Qualitative research
  • Risk communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Food Science

Cite this

Development of an effective tool for risk communication about food safety issues after the Fukushima nuclear accident : What should be considered? / Cho, Tae Jin; Kim, Nam Hee; Hong, Yoon Ji; Park, Byoung Il; Kim, Hee Sung; Lee, Hyang Gi; Song, Min Kyung; Rhee, Min-Suk.

In: Food Control, Vol. 79, 01.09.2017, p. 17-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cho, Tae Jin ; Kim, Nam Hee ; Hong, Yoon Ji ; Park, Byoung Il ; Kim, Hee Sung ; Lee, Hyang Gi ; Song, Min Kyung ; Rhee, Min-Suk. / Development of an effective tool for risk communication about food safety issues after the Fukushima nuclear accident : What should be considered?. In: Food Control. 2017 ; Vol. 79. pp. 17-26.
@article{8d031629ee9b4cc59f1f2926fca18be6,
title = "Development of an effective tool for risk communication about food safety issues after the Fukushima nuclear accident: What should be considered?",
abstract = "Although the Fukushima nuclear accident (FNA) in 2011 led to strong public anxiety about radioactive contamination of foods, the most appropriate way to communicate this risk has been poorly researched. We sought to design, develop, evaluate, and optimize an effective risk communication (RC) tool for food consumers after the FNA. To design this tool, a classical systematic qualitative research framework that consisted of formative evaluation, development of a pilot RC tool, and outcome evaluation was applied. The formative evaluation consisted of focus group interview (FGI) with food consumers: its aim was to identify the major risk messages. Due to the low knowledge base of the food consumers and the absence of a credible existing information source, a pilot RC tool was developed. An educational book was selected as the most effective RC vehicle. The FGI results were reflected in the content of the book, which was presented in a ‘frequently asked questions and answers’ format. To ensure ready comprehensibility of the book, the scientific words were paraphrased and visual aids were employed. To ensure credibility of the RC, evidence supporting its statements was provided and it was made clear that the RC was a collaborative message from multiple risk communicators (consumer organizations, government bodies, and academia). Outcome evaluation with a consumer survey showed that the RC tool effectively increased the knowledge base of food consumers and relieved their anxieties. This study suggests that in the event of another nuclear accident, food safety RCs should meet the following key requirements: 1) the RC should send a clear message that reassures food consumers that the fatal risk is well controlled, which will reduce public fear and outrage; 2) the RC should improve the knowledge base of food consumers about food safety by providing appropriate education; and 3) the RC should be produced via multi-institutional cooperation so that the credibility of risk communicators is rebuilt. Our results may help the planning of an effective radiological RC strategy for food consumers, thereby preventing misunderstandings and relieving food consumers of unnecessarily severe anxiety.",
keywords = "Consumer survey, Educational book, Focus group interview, Food safety, Fukushima nuclear accident, Qualitative research, Risk communication",
author = "Cho, {Tae Jin} and Kim, {Nam Hee} and Hong, {Yoon Ji} and Park, {Byoung Il} and Kim, {Hee Sung} and Lee, {Hyang Gi} and Song, {Min Kyung} and Min-Suk Rhee",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.023",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "17--26",
journal = "Food Control",
issn = "0956-7135",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an effective tool for risk communication about food safety issues after the Fukushima nuclear accident

T2 - What should be considered?

AU - Cho, Tae Jin

AU - Kim, Nam Hee

AU - Hong, Yoon Ji

AU - Park, Byoung Il

AU - Kim, Hee Sung

AU - Lee, Hyang Gi

AU - Song, Min Kyung

AU - Rhee, Min-Suk

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Although the Fukushima nuclear accident (FNA) in 2011 led to strong public anxiety about radioactive contamination of foods, the most appropriate way to communicate this risk has been poorly researched. We sought to design, develop, evaluate, and optimize an effective risk communication (RC) tool for food consumers after the FNA. To design this tool, a classical systematic qualitative research framework that consisted of formative evaluation, development of a pilot RC tool, and outcome evaluation was applied. The formative evaluation consisted of focus group interview (FGI) with food consumers: its aim was to identify the major risk messages. Due to the low knowledge base of the food consumers and the absence of a credible existing information source, a pilot RC tool was developed. An educational book was selected as the most effective RC vehicle. The FGI results were reflected in the content of the book, which was presented in a ‘frequently asked questions and answers’ format. To ensure ready comprehensibility of the book, the scientific words were paraphrased and visual aids were employed. To ensure credibility of the RC, evidence supporting its statements was provided and it was made clear that the RC was a collaborative message from multiple risk communicators (consumer organizations, government bodies, and academia). Outcome evaluation with a consumer survey showed that the RC tool effectively increased the knowledge base of food consumers and relieved their anxieties. This study suggests that in the event of another nuclear accident, food safety RCs should meet the following key requirements: 1) the RC should send a clear message that reassures food consumers that the fatal risk is well controlled, which will reduce public fear and outrage; 2) the RC should improve the knowledge base of food consumers about food safety by providing appropriate education; and 3) the RC should be produced via multi-institutional cooperation so that the credibility of risk communicators is rebuilt. Our results may help the planning of an effective radiological RC strategy for food consumers, thereby preventing misunderstandings and relieving food consumers of unnecessarily severe anxiety.

AB - Although the Fukushima nuclear accident (FNA) in 2011 led to strong public anxiety about radioactive contamination of foods, the most appropriate way to communicate this risk has been poorly researched. We sought to design, develop, evaluate, and optimize an effective risk communication (RC) tool for food consumers after the FNA. To design this tool, a classical systematic qualitative research framework that consisted of formative evaluation, development of a pilot RC tool, and outcome evaluation was applied. The formative evaluation consisted of focus group interview (FGI) with food consumers: its aim was to identify the major risk messages. Due to the low knowledge base of the food consumers and the absence of a credible existing information source, a pilot RC tool was developed. An educational book was selected as the most effective RC vehicle. The FGI results were reflected in the content of the book, which was presented in a ‘frequently asked questions and answers’ format. To ensure ready comprehensibility of the book, the scientific words were paraphrased and visual aids were employed. To ensure credibility of the RC, evidence supporting its statements was provided and it was made clear that the RC was a collaborative message from multiple risk communicators (consumer organizations, government bodies, and academia). Outcome evaluation with a consumer survey showed that the RC tool effectively increased the knowledge base of food consumers and relieved their anxieties. This study suggests that in the event of another nuclear accident, food safety RCs should meet the following key requirements: 1) the RC should send a clear message that reassures food consumers that the fatal risk is well controlled, which will reduce public fear and outrage; 2) the RC should improve the knowledge base of food consumers about food safety by providing appropriate education; and 3) the RC should be produced via multi-institutional cooperation so that the credibility of risk communicators is rebuilt. Our results may help the planning of an effective radiological RC strategy for food consumers, thereby preventing misunderstandings and relieving food consumers of unnecessarily severe anxiety.

KW - Consumer survey

KW - Educational book

KW - Focus group interview

KW - Food safety

KW - Fukushima nuclear accident

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Risk communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016018604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016018604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.023

DO - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.023

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 17

EP - 26

JO - Food Control

JF - Food Control

SN - 0956-7135

ER -