Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia

Maya Semrau, Alistair Burns, Slavica Djukic-Dejanovic, Defne Eraslan, Changsu Han, Dusica Lecic-Tosevski, Antonio Lobo, Adriana Mihai, Julie Morris, Claudia Palumbo, Philippe Robert, Gerthild Stiens, Gabriela Stoppe, Umberto Volpe, Marcel Olde Rikkert, Norman Sartorius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A reliable and valid global staging scale has been lacking within dementia care. Objective: To develop an easy-to-use multi-dimensional clinical staging schedule for dementia. Methods: The schedule was developed through: i) Two series of focus groups (40 and 48 participants, respectively) in Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and UK with a multi-disciplinary group of professionals working within dementia care, to assess the need for a dementia-staging tool and to obtain suggestions on its design and characteristics; ii) A pilot-study over three rounds to test inter-rater reliability of the newly developed schedule using written case histories, with five members of the project's steering committee and 27 of their colleagues from Netherlands, France, and Spain as participants; and iii) A field-study to test the schedule's inter-rater reliability in clinical practice in France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Turkey, South Korea, Romania, and Serbia, which included 209 dementia patients and 217 of their caregivers as participants. Results: Focus group participants indicated a clear need for a culture-fair international dementia staging scale and reached consensus on face validity and content validity. Accordingly, the schedule has been composed of seven dimensions including behavioral, cognitive, physical, functional, social, and care aspects. Overall, the schedule showed adequate face validity, content validity, and inter-rater reliability; in the nine field-sites, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; absolute agreement) for individual dimensions ranged between 0.38 and 1.0, with 84.4% of ICCs over 0.7. ICCs for total sum scores ranged between 0.89 and 0.99 in the nine field-sites. Conclusion: The IDEAL schedule looks promising as tool for the clinical and social management of people with dementia globally, though further reliability and validity testing is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-151
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Dementia
Appointments and Schedules
Reproducibility of Results
Netherlands
Spain
France
Focus Groups
Germany
Serbia
Romania
Republic of Korea
Denmark
Turkey
Switzerland
Italy
Caregivers
Consensus

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Mental status schedule
  • Patient schedule
  • Psychometrics
  • Reliability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Semrau, M., Burns, A., Djukic-Dejanovic, S., Eraslan, D., Han, C., Lecic-Tosevski, D., ... Sartorius, N. (2015). Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 44(1), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-141599

Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia. / Semrau, Maya; Burns, Alistair; Djukic-Dejanovic, Slavica; Eraslan, Defne; Han, Changsu; Lecic-Tosevski, Dusica; Lobo, Antonio; Mihai, Adriana; Morris, Julie; Palumbo, Claudia; Robert, Philippe; Stiens, Gerthild; Stoppe, Gabriela; Volpe, Umberto; Olde Rikkert, Marcel; Sartorius, Norman.

In: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 139-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Semrau, M, Burns, A, Djukic-Dejanovic, S, Eraslan, D, Han, C, Lecic-Tosevski, D, Lobo, A, Mihai, A, Morris, J, Palumbo, C, Robert, P, Stiens, G, Stoppe, G, Volpe, U, Olde Rikkert, M & Sartorius, N 2015, 'Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia', Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 139-151. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-141599
Semrau, Maya ; Burns, Alistair ; Djukic-Dejanovic, Slavica ; Eraslan, Defne ; Han, Changsu ; Lecic-Tosevski, Dusica ; Lobo, Antonio ; Mihai, Adriana ; Morris, Julie ; Palumbo, Claudia ; Robert, Philippe ; Stiens, Gerthild ; Stoppe, Gabriela ; Volpe, Umberto ; Olde Rikkert, Marcel ; Sartorius, Norman. / Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia. In: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 139-151.
@article{16d281cb759a4f72a1b5bbbb5bf2b866,
title = "Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia",
abstract = "Background: A reliable and valid global staging scale has been lacking within dementia care. Objective: To develop an easy-to-use multi-dimensional clinical staging schedule for dementia. Methods: The schedule was developed through: i) Two series of focus groups (40 and 48 participants, respectively) in Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and UK with a multi-disciplinary group of professionals working within dementia care, to assess the need for a dementia-staging tool and to obtain suggestions on its design and characteristics; ii) A pilot-study over three rounds to test inter-rater reliability of the newly developed schedule using written case histories, with five members of the project's steering committee and 27 of their colleagues from Netherlands, France, and Spain as participants; and iii) A field-study to test the schedule's inter-rater reliability in clinical practice in France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Turkey, South Korea, Romania, and Serbia, which included 209 dementia patients and 217 of their caregivers as participants. Results: Focus group participants indicated a clear need for a culture-fair international dementia staging scale and reached consensus on face validity and content validity. Accordingly, the schedule has been composed of seven dimensions including behavioral, cognitive, physical, functional, social, and care aspects. Overall, the schedule showed adequate face validity, content validity, and inter-rater reliability; in the nine field-sites, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; absolute agreement) for individual dimensions ranged between 0.38 and 1.0, with 84.4{\%} of ICCs over 0.7. ICCs for total sum scores ranged between 0.89 and 0.99 in the nine field-sites. Conclusion: The IDEAL schedule looks promising as tool for the clinical and social management of people with dementia globally, though further reliability and validity testing is needed.",
keywords = "Dementia, Mental status schedule, Patient schedule, Psychometrics, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Maya Semrau and Alistair Burns and Slavica Djukic-Dejanovic and Defne Eraslan and Changsu Han and Dusica Lecic-Tosevski and Antonio Lobo and Adriana Mihai and Julie Morris and Claudia Palumbo and Philippe Robert and Gerthild Stiens and Gabriela Stoppe and Umberto Volpe and {Olde Rikkert}, Marcel and Norman Sartorius",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/JAD-141599",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "139--151",
journal = "Journal of Alzheimer's Disease",
issn = "1387-2877",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an international schedule for the assessment and staging of care for dementia

AU - Semrau, Maya

AU - Burns, Alistair

AU - Djukic-Dejanovic, Slavica

AU - Eraslan, Defne

AU - Han, Changsu

AU - Lecic-Tosevski, Dusica

AU - Lobo, Antonio

AU - Mihai, Adriana

AU - Morris, Julie

AU - Palumbo, Claudia

AU - Robert, Philippe

AU - Stiens, Gerthild

AU - Stoppe, Gabriela

AU - Volpe, Umberto

AU - Olde Rikkert, Marcel

AU - Sartorius, Norman

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: A reliable and valid global staging scale has been lacking within dementia care. Objective: To develop an easy-to-use multi-dimensional clinical staging schedule for dementia. Methods: The schedule was developed through: i) Two series of focus groups (40 and 48 participants, respectively) in Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and UK with a multi-disciplinary group of professionals working within dementia care, to assess the need for a dementia-staging tool and to obtain suggestions on its design and characteristics; ii) A pilot-study over three rounds to test inter-rater reliability of the newly developed schedule using written case histories, with five members of the project's steering committee and 27 of their colleagues from Netherlands, France, and Spain as participants; and iii) A field-study to test the schedule's inter-rater reliability in clinical practice in France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Turkey, South Korea, Romania, and Serbia, which included 209 dementia patients and 217 of their caregivers as participants. Results: Focus group participants indicated a clear need for a culture-fair international dementia staging scale and reached consensus on face validity and content validity. Accordingly, the schedule has been composed of seven dimensions including behavioral, cognitive, physical, functional, social, and care aspects. Overall, the schedule showed adequate face validity, content validity, and inter-rater reliability; in the nine field-sites, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; absolute agreement) for individual dimensions ranged between 0.38 and 1.0, with 84.4% of ICCs over 0.7. ICCs for total sum scores ranged between 0.89 and 0.99 in the nine field-sites. Conclusion: The IDEAL schedule looks promising as tool for the clinical and social management of people with dementia globally, though further reliability and validity testing is needed.

AB - Background: A reliable and valid global staging scale has been lacking within dementia care. Objective: To develop an easy-to-use multi-dimensional clinical staging schedule for dementia. Methods: The schedule was developed through: i) Two series of focus groups (40 and 48 participants, respectively) in Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and UK with a multi-disciplinary group of professionals working within dementia care, to assess the need for a dementia-staging tool and to obtain suggestions on its design and characteristics; ii) A pilot-study over three rounds to test inter-rater reliability of the newly developed schedule using written case histories, with five members of the project's steering committee and 27 of their colleagues from Netherlands, France, and Spain as participants; and iii) A field-study to test the schedule's inter-rater reliability in clinical practice in France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Turkey, South Korea, Romania, and Serbia, which included 209 dementia patients and 217 of their caregivers as participants. Results: Focus group participants indicated a clear need for a culture-fair international dementia staging scale and reached consensus on face validity and content validity. Accordingly, the schedule has been composed of seven dimensions including behavioral, cognitive, physical, functional, social, and care aspects. Overall, the schedule showed adequate face validity, content validity, and inter-rater reliability; in the nine field-sites, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; absolute agreement) for individual dimensions ranged between 0.38 and 1.0, with 84.4% of ICCs over 0.7. ICCs for total sum scores ranged between 0.89 and 0.99 in the nine field-sites. Conclusion: The IDEAL schedule looks promising as tool for the clinical and social management of people with dementia globally, though further reliability and validity testing is needed.

KW - Dementia

KW - Mental status schedule

KW - Patient schedule

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920759802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920759802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JAD-141599

DO - 10.3233/JAD-141599

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 139

EP - 151

JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

SN - 1387-2877

IS - 1

ER -