Diagnosis of biliary stone disease: T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography

In Young Choi; Suk Keu Yeom; Sang Hoon Cha; Seung Hwa Lee; Hwan Hoon Chung; Jong Jin Hyun; Baek Hyun Kim

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001

Diagnosis of biliary stone disease: T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography

In Young Choi, Suk Keu Yeom, Sang Hoon Cha, Seung Hwa Lee, Hwan Hoon Chung, Jong Jin Hyun, Baek Hyun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	164-169
Number of pages	6
Journal	Clinical Imaging
Volume	38
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001
Publication status	Published - 2014 Mar

Keywords

Biliary calculi
Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001

Cite this

@article{fb147060dd1b4993a482164ed5352c24,

title = "Diagnosis of biliary stone disease: T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography",

abstract = "Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.",

keywords = "Biliary calculi, Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA, Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography",

author = "Choi, {In Young} and Yeom, {Suk Keu} and Cha, {Sang Hoon} and Lee, {Seung Hwa} and Chung, {Hwan Hoon} and Hyun, {Jong Jin} and Kim, {Baek Hyun}",

year = "2014",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "164--169",

journal = "Clinical Imaging",

issn = "0899-7071",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of biliary stone disease

T2 - T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography

AU - Choi, In Young

AU - Yeom, Suk Keu

AU - Cha, Sang Hoon

AU - Lee, Seung Hwa

AU - Chung, Hwan Hoon

AU - Hyun, Jong Jin

AU - Kim, Baek Hyun

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.

AB - Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.

KW - Biliary calculi

KW - Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA

KW - Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895826949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895826949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 24359645

AN - SCOPUS:84895826949

VL - 38

SP - 164

EP - 169

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 2

ER -

Diagnosis of biliary stone disease: T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this