Abstract
Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 164-169 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Clinical Imaging |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 Jan 1 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Biliary calculi
- Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA
- Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
Diagnosis of biliary stone disease : T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography. / Choi, In Young; Yeom, Suk Keu; Cha, Sang Hoon; Lee, Seung Hwa; Chung, Hwan Hoon; Hyun, Jong Jin; Kim, Baek Hyun.
In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 164-169.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of biliary stone disease
T2 - T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography
AU - Choi, In Young
AU - Yeom, Suk Keu
AU - Cha, Sang Hoon
AU - Lee, Seung Hwa
AU - Chung, Hwan Hoon
AU - Hyun, Jong Jin
AU - Kim, Baek Hyun
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.
AB - Objective: We aimed to compare diagnostic performance of gadoxetic-acid-enhanced-T1-weighted-MR cholangiography (MRC) with that of conventional T2-weighted-MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients who underwent MRC for evaluation of biliary disease were included. Presence of stones in extrahepatic duct, gallbladder and intrahepatic duct, and presence of acute cholecystitis were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biliary stone disease diagnosis in each biliary duct location according to each image sets were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between two sets of MRC in diagnosing biliary stone disease. Conclusions: Diagnostic performance of T1-MRC with gadoxetic-acid in diagnosing biliary stone disease is comparable to that of T2-MRC.
KW - Biliary calculi
KW - Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA
KW - Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895826949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895826949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 24359645
AN - SCOPUS:84895826949
VL - 38
SP - 164
EP - 169
JO - Clinical Imaging
JF - Clinical Imaging
SN - 0899-7071
IS - 2
ER -