Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with gout: A meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) for patients with gout. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, and performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US according to the double contour sign, tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion in patients with gout. Results: In total, 11 studies including 938 patients with gout, and 788 controls (patients with nongout inflammatory arthritis) were available for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 65.1% ([95% confidence interval (CI): 62.0-68.2] and 89.0% (96.6-91.1), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 5.889 (3.365-10.30), 0.359 (0.266-0.485), and 17.61 (11.11-17.92), respectively. The area under the curve of US was 0.858 and the Q * index was 0.789, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. Some between-study heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses. Meta-regression showed that the sample size, study design, and diagnostic criteria were not sources of heterogeneity, and subgroup meta-analyses did not change the overall diagnostic accuracy. US signs of tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion besides the double contour sign were not sensitive (54.3%, 30.8%, and 51.6%), but specific (93.2%, 90.6%, and 93.3%) enough as a diagnostic tool. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of published studies demonstrates that US offers good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and can play an important role in the diagnosis of gout.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Gout
Meta-Analysis
Ultrasonography
PubMed
Sample Size
Libraries
Area Under Curve
Arthritis
Odds Ratio
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Gout
  • Meta-analysis
  • US

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{8257961d0976414e97849aac106bf136,
title = "Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with gout: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) for patients with gout. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, and performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US according to the double contour sign, tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion in patients with gout. Results: In total, 11 studies including 938 patients with gout, and 788 controls (patients with nongout inflammatory arthritis) were available for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 65.1{\%} ([95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 62.0-68.2] and 89.0{\%} (96.6-91.1), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 5.889 (3.365-10.30), 0.359 (0.266-0.485), and 17.61 (11.11-17.92), respectively. The area under the curve of US was 0.858 and the Q * index was 0.789, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. Some between-study heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses. Meta-regression showed that the sample size, study design, and diagnostic criteria were not sources of heterogeneity, and subgroup meta-analyses did not change the overall diagnostic accuracy. US signs of tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion besides the double contour sign were not sensitive (54.3{\%}, 30.8{\%}, and 51.6{\%}), but specific (93.2{\%}, 90.6{\%}, and 93.3{\%}) enough as a diagnostic tool. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of published studies demonstrates that US offers good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and can play an important role in the diagnosis of gout.",
keywords = "Diagnostic accuracy, Gout, Meta-analysis, US",
author = "Lee, {Young Ho} and Song, {Gwan Gyu}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.09.012",
language = "English",
journal = "Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism",
issn = "0049-0172",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with gout

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Lee, Young Ho

AU - Song, Gwan Gyu

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) for patients with gout. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, and performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US according to the double contour sign, tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion in patients with gout. Results: In total, 11 studies including 938 patients with gout, and 788 controls (patients with nongout inflammatory arthritis) were available for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 65.1% ([95% confidence interval (CI): 62.0-68.2] and 89.0% (96.6-91.1), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 5.889 (3.365-10.30), 0.359 (0.266-0.485), and 17.61 (11.11-17.92), respectively. The area under the curve of US was 0.858 and the Q * index was 0.789, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. Some between-study heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses. Meta-regression showed that the sample size, study design, and diagnostic criteria were not sources of heterogeneity, and subgroup meta-analyses did not change the overall diagnostic accuracy. US signs of tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion besides the double contour sign were not sensitive (54.3%, 30.8%, and 51.6%), but specific (93.2%, 90.6%, and 93.3%) enough as a diagnostic tool. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of published studies demonstrates that US offers good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and can play an important role in the diagnosis of gout.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US) for patients with gout. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, and performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US according to the double contour sign, tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion in patients with gout. Results: In total, 11 studies including 938 patients with gout, and 788 controls (patients with nongout inflammatory arthritis) were available for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 65.1% ([95% confidence interval (CI): 62.0-68.2] and 89.0% (96.6-91.1), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 5.889 (3.365-10.30), 0.359 (0.266-0.485), and 17.61 (11.11-17.92), respectively. The area under the curve of US was 0.858 and the Q * index was 0.789, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. Some between-study heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses. Meta-regression showed that the sample size, study design, and diagnostic criteria were not sources of heterogeneity, and subgroup meta-analyses did not change the overall diagnostic accuracy. US signs of tophus, snowstorm, or bony erosion besides the double contour sign were not sensitive (54.3%, 30.8%, and 51.6%), but specific (93.2%, 90.6%, and 93.3%) enough as a diagnostic tool. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of published studies demonstrates that US offers good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and can play an important role in the diagnosis of gout.

KW - Diagnostic accuracy

KW - Gout

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - US

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031682281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031682281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.09.012

DO - 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.09.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 29054295

AN - SCOPUS:85031682281

JO - Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

JF - Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

SN - 0049-0172

ER -