Diagnostic issues of depressive disorders from kraepelinian dualism to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition

Seon Cheol Park, Yong Ku Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) was mainly influenced by the neo-Kraepelinian approach, its categorical approach to defining mental disorders has been criticized from the viewpoint of etiological neutrality. In the context of bridging the gap between “presumed etiologies-based symptomatology” and “identifiable pathophysiological etiologies,” the content in 5th edition, the DSM-5, has been revised to incorporate a combination of categorical and dimensional approaches. The most remarkable change of note regarding the diagnostic classification of depressive disorders in the DSM-5 is the splitting of mood disorders into bipolar disorders and depressive disorders, which is in accordance with the deconstruction of the Kraepelinian dualism for psychoses. The transdiagnostic specifiers “with mixed features,” “with psychotic features,” and “with anxious distress” are introduced to describe the relationships of depressive disorders with bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder, respectively, in a dimensional manner. The lowering of the diagnostic threshold for major depressive disorder (MDD) may be caused by the addition of “hopelessness” to the subjective descriptors of depressive mood and the elimination of “bereavement exclusion” from the definition of MDD. Since the heterogeneity of MDD is equivalent to the Wittgensteinian “games” analogy, the different types of MDD are related not by a single essential feature but rather by “family resemblance.” Network analyses of MDD symptoms may therefore need further review to elucidate the connections among interrelated symptoms and other clinical elements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-644
Number of pages9
JournalPsychiatry Investigation
Volume16
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Sep

Fingerprint

Major Depressive Disorder
Depressive Disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Bereavement
Anxiety Disorders
Mood Disorders
Mental Disorders
Psychotic Disorders
Schizophrenia
Depression

Keywords

  • Categorical approach
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  • Dimensional approach
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Diagnostic issues of depressive disorders from kraepelinian dualism to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition. / Park, Seon Cheol; Kim, Yong Ku.

In: Psychiatry Investigation, Vol. 16, No. 9, 09.2019, p. 636-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0507f86dcdb74188838f3a8dee4cb773,
title = "Diagnostic issues of depressive disorders from kraepelinian dualism to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition",
abstract = "Because the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) was mainly influenced by the neo-Kraepelinian approach, its categorical approach to defining mental disorders has been criticized from the viewpoint of etiological neutrality. In the context of bridging the gap between “presumed etiologies-based symptomatology” and “identifiable pathophysiological etiologies,” the content in 5th edition, the DSM-5, has been revised to incorporate a combination of categorical and dimensional approaches. The most remarkable change of note regarding the diagnostic classification of depressive disorders in the DSM-5 is the splitting of mood disorders into bipolar disorders and depressive disorders, which is in accordance with the deconstruction of the Kraepelinian dualism for psychoses. The transdiagnostic specifiers “with mixed features,” “with psychotic features,” and “with anxious distress” are introduced to describe the relationships of depressive disorders with bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder, respectively, in a dimensional manner. The lowering of the diagnostic threshold for major depressive disorder (MDD) may be caused by the addition of “hopelessness” to the subjective descriptors of depressive mood and the elimination of “bereavement exclusion” from the definition of MDD. Since the heterogeneity of MDD is equivalent to the Wittgensteinian “games” analogy, the different types of MDD are related not by a single essential feature but rather by “family resemblance.” Network analyses of MDD symptoms may therefore need further review to elucidate the connections among interrelated symptoms and other clinical elements.",
keywords = "Categorical approach, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Dimensional approach, Major depressive disorder, Network analysis",
author = "Park, {Seon Cheol} and Kim, {Yong Ku}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.30773/pi.2019.09.07",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "636--644",
journal = "Psychiatry Investigation",
issn = "1738-3684",
publisher = "Korean Neuropsychiatric Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic issues of depressive disorders from kraepelinian dualism to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition

AU - Park, Seon Cheol

AU - Kim, Yong Ku

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Because the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) was mainly influenced by the neo-Kraepelinian approach, its categorical approach to defining mental disorders has been criticized from the viewpoint of etiological neutrality. In the context of bridging the gap between “presumed etiologies-based symptomatology” and “identifiable pathophysiological etiologies,” the content in 5th edition, the DSM-5, has been revised to incorporate a combination of categorical and dimensional approaches. The most remarkable change of note regarding the diagnostic classification of depressive disorders in the DSM-5 is the splitting of mood disorders into bipolar disorders and depressive disorders, which is in accordance with the deconstruction of the Kraepelinian dualism for psychoses. The transdiagnostic specifiers “with mixed features,” “with psychotic features,” and “with anxious distress” are introduced to describe the relationships of depressive disorders with bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder, respectively, in a dimensional manner. The lowering of the diagnostic threshold for major depressive disorder (MDD) may be caused by the addition of “hopelessness” to the subjective descriptors of depressive mood and the elimination of “bereavement exclusion” from the definition of MDD. Since the heterogeneity of MDD is equivalent to the Wittgensteinian “games” analogy, the different types of MDD are related not by a single essential feature but rather by “family resemblance.” Network analyses of MDD symptoms may therefore need further review to elucidate the connections among interrelated symptoms and other clinical elements.

AB - Because the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) was mainly influenced by the neo-Kraepelinian approach, its categorical approach to defining mental disorders has been criticized from the viewpoint of etiological neutrality. In the context of bridging the gap between “presumed etiologies-based symptomatology” and “identifiable pathophysiological etiologies,” the content in 5th edition, the DSM-5, has been revised to incorporate a combination of categorical and dimensional approaches. The most remarkable change of note regarding the diagnostic classification of depressive disorders in the DSM-5 is the splitting of mood disorders into bipolar disorders and depressive disorders, which is in accordance with the deconstruction of the Kraepelinian dualism for psychoses. The transdiagnostic specifiers “with mixed features,” “with psychotic features,” and “with anxious distress” are introduced to describe the relationships of depressive disorders with bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder, respectively, in a dimensional manner. The lowering of the diagnostic threshold for major depressive disorder (MDD) may be caused by the addition of “hopelessness” to the subjective descriptors of depressive mood and the elimination of “bereavement exclusion” from the definition of MDD. Since the heterogeneity of MDD is equivalent to the Wittgensteinian “games” analogy, the different types of MDD are related not by a single essential feature but rather by “family resemblance.” Network analyses of MDD symptoms may therefore need further review to elucidate the connections among interrelated symptoms and other clinical elements.

KW - Categorical approach

KW - Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

KW - Dimensional approach

KW - Major depressive disorder

KW - Network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073790524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073790524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.30773/pi.2019.09.07

DO - 10.30773/pi.2019.09.07

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85073790524

VL - 16

SP - 636

EP - 644

JO - Psychiatry Investigation

JF - Psychiatry Investigation

SN - 1738-3684

IS - 9

ER -