Diagnostic performance of CellaVision DM96 for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum screening in peripheral blood smears

Jung Yoon, Jung Ah Kwon, Soo-Young Yoon, Woong Sik Jang, Dong June Yang, Jeonghun Nam, Chae Seung Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Microscopic examination of blood smears is the standard method for malaria diagnosis but is labor-intensive and requires expert staff. CellaVision DM96 (CellaVision, Lund, Sweden) is a digital hematology analyzer available for advanced morphological analysis of blood films including intracellular parasites. Here, we evaluated the CellaVision DM96 Advanced RBC Application for malaria detection in stained peripheral blood (PB) smears. Two hundred and twenty thin PB smear slides (84 P. vivax, 14 P. falciparum, 122 negative controls) were stained with Wright-Giemsa using automated slidemaker/strainers of Beckman Coulter hematology systems (LH780, Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL). The slides were automatically analyzed by CellaVision, and images were manually reviewed by experts. The results of automatic and manual detection by CellaVision were compared to those of microscopic examination. The sensitivity and specificity of automatic detection by CellaVision were 23.5% (23/98) and 81.1% (99/122), respectively. When CellaVision images were manually reviewed, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 65.3% (64/98) and 90.2% (110/122), respectively. The detection of P. falciparum showed the highest sensitivity by both the automated (33.3%) and the manual (85.7%) method. CellaVision misinterpreted malaria parasites as Howell-Jolly bodies in 57.1%, as Pappenheimer bodies in 84.7%, and as basophilic stipplings in 75.5% of the slides. Malaria diagnosis using CellaVision DM96 requires further improvements. Manual review improves CellaVision performance, but confirmation by conventional microscopy remains essential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-11
Number of pages5
JournalActa Tropica
Volume193
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 May 1

Fingerprint

Plasmodium vivax
Plasmodium falciparum
malaria
Malaria
screening
blood
Hematology
hematology
Erythrocyte Inclusions
Parasites
automatic detection
parasites
Sensitivity and Specificity
hematologic tests
Sweden
Microscopy
microscopy
labor
erythrocytes
methodology

Keywords

  • CellaVision
  • Malaria
  • Microscopy
  • Peripheral blood

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • veterinary (miscalleneous)
  • Insect Science
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Diagnostic performance of CellaVision DM96 for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum screening in peripheral blood smears. / Yoon, Jung; Kwon, Jung Ah; Yoon, Soo-Young; Jang, Woong Sik; Yang, Dong June; Nam, Jeonghun; Lim, Chae Seung.

In: Acta Tropica, Vol. 193, 01.05.2019, p. 7-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yoon, Jung ; Kwon, Jung Ah ; Yoon, Soo-Young ; Jang, Woong Sik ; Yang, Dong June ; Nam, Jeonghun ; Lim, Chae Seung. / Diagnostic performance of CellaVision DM96 for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum screening in peripheral blood smears. In: Acta Tropica. 2019 ; Vol. 193. pp. 7-11.
@article{e96a20cc34b8474fa6fd38f4744395eb,
title = "Diagnostic performance of CellaVision DM96 for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum screening in peripheral blood smears",
abstract = "Microscopic examination of blood smears is the standard method for malaria diagnosis but is labor-intensive and requires expert staff. CellaVision DM96 (CellaVision, Lund, Sweden) is a digital hematology analyzer available for advanced morphological analysis of blood films including intracellular parasites. Here, we evaluated the CellaVision DM96 Advanced RBC Application for malaria detection in stained peripheral blood (PB) smears. Two hundred and twenty thin PB smear slides (84 P. vivax, 14 P. falciparum, 122 negative controls) were stained with Wright-Giemsa using automated slidemaker/strainers of Beckman Coulter hematology systems (LH780, Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL). The slides were automatically analyzed by CellaVision, and images were manually reviewed by experts. The results of automatic and manual detection by CellaVision were compared to those of microscopic examination. The sensitivity and specificity of automatic detection by CellaVision were 23.5{\%} (23/98) and 81.1{\%} (99/122), respectively. When CellaVision images were manually reviewed, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 65.3{\%} (64/98) and 90.2{\%} (110/122), respectively. The detection of P. falciparum showed the highest sensitivity by both the automated (33.3{\%}) and the manual (85.7{\%}) method. CellaVision misinterpreted malaria parasites as Howell-Jolly bodies in 57.1{\%}, as Pappenheimer bodies in 84.7{\%}, and as basophilic stipplings in 75.5{\%} of the slides. Malaria diagnosis using CellaVision DM96 requires further improvements. Manual review improves CellaVision performance, but confirmation by conventional microscopy remains essential.",
keywords = "CellaVision, Malaria, Microscopy, Peripheral blood",
author = "Jung Yoon and Kwon, {Jung Ah} and Soo-Young Yoon and Jang, {Woong Sik} and Yang, {Dong June} and Jeonghun Nam and Lim, {Chae Seung}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.02.009",
language = "English",
volume = "193",
pages = "7--11",
journal = "Acta Tropica",
issn = "0001-706X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic performance of CellaVision DM96 for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum screening in peripheral blood smears

AU - Yoon, Jung

AU - Kwon, Jung Ah

AU - Yoon, Soo-Young

AU - Jang, Woong Sik

AU - Yang, Dong June

AU - Nam, Jeonghun

AU - Lim, Chae Seung

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Microscopic examination of blood smears is the standard method for malaria diagnosis but is labor-intensive and requires expert staff. CellaVision DM96 (CellaVision, Lund, Sweden) is a digital hematology analyzer available for advanced morphological analysis of blood films including intracellular parasites. Here, we evaluated the CellaVision DM96 Advanced RBC Application for malaria detection in stained peripheral blood (PB) smears. Two hundred and twenty thin PB smear slides (84 P. vivax, 14 P. falciparum, 122 negative controls) were stained with Wright-Giemsa using automated slidemaker/strainers of Beckman Coulter hematology systems (LH780, Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL). The slides were automatically analyzed by CellaVision, and images were manually reviewed by experts. The results of automatic and manual detection by CellaVision were compared to those of microscopic examination. The sensitivity and specificity of automatic detection by CellaVision were 23.5% (23/98) and 81.1% (99/122), respectively. When CellaVision images were manually reviewed, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 65.3% (64/98) and 90.2% (110/122), respectively. The detection of P. falciparum showed the highest sensitivity by both the automated (33.3%) and the manual (85.7%) method. CellaVision misinterpreted malaria parasites as Howell-Jolly bodies in 57.1%, as Pappenheimer bodies in 84.7%, and as basophilic stipplings in 75.5% of the slides. Malaria diagnosis using CellaVision DM96 requires further improvements. Manual review improves CellaVision performance, but confirmation by conventional microscopy remains essential.

AB - Microscopic examination of blood smears is the standard method for malaria diagnosis but is labor-intensive and requires expert staff. CellaVision DM96 (CellaVision, Lund, Sweden) is a digital hematology analyzer available for advanced morphological analysis of blood films including intracellular parasites. Here, we evaluated the CellaVision DM96 Advanced RBC Application for malaria detection in stained peripheral blood (PB) smears. Two hundred and twenty thin PB smear slides (84 P. vivax, 14 P. falciparum, 122 negative controls) were stained with Wright-Giemsa using automated slidemaker/strainers of Beckman Coulter hematology systems (LH780, Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL). The slides were automatically analyzed by CellaVision, and images were manually reviewed by experts. The results of automatic and manual detection by CellaVision were compared to those of microscopic examination. The sensitivity and specificity of automatic detection by CellaVision were 23.5% (23/98) and 81.1% (99/122), respectively. When CellaVision images were manually reviewed, the sensitivity and specificity increased to 65.3% (64/98) and 90.2% (110/122), respectively. The detection of P. falciparum showed the highest sensitivity by both the automated (33.3%) and the manual (85.7%) method. CellaVision misinterpreted malaria parasites as Howell-Jolly bodies in 57.1%, as Pappenheimer bodies in 84.7%, and as basophilic stipplings in 75.5% of the slides. Malaria diagnosis using CellaVision DM96 requires further improvements. Manual review improves CellaVision performance, but confirmation by conventional microscopy remains essential.

KW - CellaVision

KW - Malaria

KW - Microscopy

KW - Peripheral blood

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061630088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061630088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.02.009

DO - 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.02.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 30768978

AN - SCOPUS:85061630088

VL - 193

SP - 7

EP - 11

JO - Acta Tropica

JF - Acta Tropica

SN - 0001-706X

ER -