Differences in corneal astigmatism between partial coherence interferometry biometry and automated keratometry and relation to topographic pattern

Ji Hye Park, Su Yeon Kang, Hyo Myung Kim, Jong-Suk Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the corneal astigmatism values obtained with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer and an automated keratometer and to evaluate the association between these differences and corneal topographic patterns. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Design: Comparative case series. Methods: Corneal astigmatism was measured by PCI biometry (IOLMaster) and automated keratometry (RK-F1 autorefractor). Eyes were divided into 3 groups based on the difference in absolute astigmatism values between PCI biometry and automated keratometry (ie, PCI biometry - automated keratometry) as follows: Group 1, more than 0.25 diopter (D); Group 2, within ±0.25 D; Group 3, less than -0.25 D. The topographic maps were grouped into patterns of round, oval, symmetric bow tie, asymmetric bow tie, and irregular. Distributions of topographic patterns according to group and astigmatism values by topographic patterns were evaluated. Results: The study enrolled 312 eyes. The most common pattern was the asymmetric bow tie (34.6%) followed by symmetric bow tie (20.5%), round (18.9%), irregular (16.3%), and oval (9.6%). The asymmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common in Group 1 and Group 2 (36.1% and 50.0%, respectively); however, in Group 3, the symmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common (32.8%). The distribution of topographic patterns by groups was statistically significantly different (P=.015, Pearson chi-square test). Conclusion: The difference in corneal astigmatism between the PCI biometer and automated keratometer may depend on the corneal topography pattern. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1694-1698
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Interferometry
Biometry
Astigmatism
Korea
Corneal Topography
Disclosure
Ophthalmology
Chi-Square Distribution
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{a231a5529ea54074987aa9bbd39632c7,
title = "Differences in corneal astigmatism between partial coherence interferometry biometry and automated keratometry and relation to topographic pattern",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the corneal astigmatism values obtained with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer and an automated keratometer and to evaluate the association between these differences and corneal topographic patterns. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Design: Comparative case series. Methods: Corneal astigmatism was measured by PCI biometry (IOLMaster) and automated keratometry (RK-F1 autorefractor). Eyes were divided into 3 groups based on the difference in absolute astigmatism values between PCI biometry and automated keratometry (ie, PCI biometry - automated keratometry) as follows: Group 1, more than 0.25 diopter (D); Group 2, within ±0.25 D; Group 3, less than -0.25 D. The topographic maps were grouped into patterns of round, oval, symmetric bow tie, asymmetric bow tie, and irregular. Distributions of topographic patterns according to group and astigmatism values by topographic patterns were evaluated. Results: The study enrolled 312 eyes. The most common pattern was the asymmetric bow tie (34.6{\%}) followed by symmetric bow tie (20.5{\%}), round (18.9{\%}), irregular (16.3{\%}), and oval (9.6{\%}). The asymmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common in Group 1 and Group 2 (36.1{\%} and 50.0{\%}, respectively); however, in Group 3, the symmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common (32.8{\%}). The distribution of topographic patterns by groups was statistically significantly different (P=.015, Pearson chi-square test). Conclusion: The difference in corneal astigmatism between the PCI biometer and automated keratometer may depend on the corneal topography pattern. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Park, {Ji Hye} and Kang, {Su Yeon} and Kim, {Hyo Myung} and Jong-Suk Song",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.047",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1694--1698",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in corneal astigmatism between partial coherence interferometry biometry and automated keratometry and relation to topographic pattern

AU - Park, Ji Hye

AU - Kang, Su Yeon

AU - Kim, Hyo Myung

AU - Song, Jong-Suk

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the corneal astigmatism values obtained with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer and an automated keratometer and to evaluate the association between these differences and corneal topographic patterns. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Design: Comparative case series. Methods: Corneal astigmatism was measured by PCI biometry (IOLMaster) and automated keratometry (RK-F1 autorefractor). Eyes were divided into 3 groups based on the difference in absolute astigmatism values between PCI biometry and automated keratometry (ie, PCI biometry - automated keratometry) as follows: Group 1, more than 0.25 diopter (D); Group 2, within ±0.25 D; Group 3, less than -0.25 D. The topographic maps were grouped into patterns of round, oval, symmetric bow tie, asymmetric bow tie, and irregular. Distributions of topographic patterns according to group and astigmatism values by topographic patterns were evaluated. Results: The study enrolled 312 eyes. The most common pattern was the asymmetric bow tie (34.6%) followed by symmetric bow tie (20.5%), round (18.9%), irregular (16.3%), and oval (9.6%). The asymmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common in Group 1 and Group 2 (36.1% and 50.0%, respectively); however, in Group 3, the symmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common (32.8%). The distribution of topographic patterns by groups was statistically significantly different (P=.015, Pearson chi-square test). Conclusion: The difference in corneal astigmatism between the PCI biometer and automated keratometer may depend on the corneal topography pattern. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose: To compare the corneal astigmatism values obtained with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer and an automated keratometer and to evaluate the association between these differences and corneal topographic patterns. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Design: Comparative case series. Methods: Corneal astigmatism was measured by PCI biometry (IOLMaster) and automated keratometry (RK-F1 autorefractor). Eyes were divided into 3 groups based on the difference in absolute astigmatism values between PCI biometry and automated keratometry (ie, PCI biometry - automated keratometry) as follows: Group 1, more than 0.25 diopter (D); Group 2, within ±0.25 D; Group 3, less than -0.25 D. The topographic maps were grouped into patterns of round, oval, symmetric bow tie, asymmetric bow tie, and irregular. Distributions of topographic patterns according to group and astigmatism values by topographic patterns were evaluated. Results: The study enrolled 312 eyes. The most common pattern was the asymmetric bow tie (34.6%) followed by symmetric bow tie (20.5%), round (18.9%), irregular (16.3%), and oval (9.6%). The asymmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common in Group 1 and Group 2 (36.1% and 50.0%, respectively); however, in Group 3, the symmetric bow-tie pattern was the most common (32.8%). The distribution of topographic patterns by groups was statistically significantly different (P=.015, Pearson chi-square test). Conclusion: The difference in corneal astigmatism between the PCI biometer and automated keratometer may depend on the corneal topography pattern. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051908383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051908383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.047

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.047

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1694

EP - 1698

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 9

ER -