Differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions with gray scale sonographic, color doppler sonographic, and clinical features

Dal Mo Yang, Sun Ho Kim, Ha Na Kim, Jee Hee Kang, Tae-Seok Seo, Hee Young Hwang, Hyung Sik Kim, Hyuni Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether focal epididymal lesions can be differentiated on gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of 60 focal epididymal lesions in 57 patients. Focal epididymal lesions were classified into 3 groups: nonspecific epididymitis (n = 43), tuberculous epididymitis (n = 10), and benign epididymal masses (n = 7). The following gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features were analyzed: size, location, echogenicity, and heterogeneity of the lesion; hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim presence; hydrocele presence; degree of blood flow in the lesion; patient's age; duration of symptoms; and scrotal tenderness. Results. Lesions were larger in patients with tuberculous epididymitis than in those with either nonspecific epididymitis (P = .007) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0017). The hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim of the lesion was more common in patients with benign epididymal masses than in those with nonspecific epididymitis (P = .002). The degree of blood flow in the lesion was greater in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P = .0019) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). The duration of symptoms was shorter in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0092). The frequency of scrotal tenderness was higher in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). Conclusions. Gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and some clinical features may be helpful for differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-142
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epididymitis
Differential Diagnosis
Color

Keywords

  • Doppler sonography
  • Epididymal tumors
  • Epididymis
  • Epididymitis
  • Sonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions with gray scale sonographic, color doppler sonographic, and clinical features. / Yang, Dal Mo; Kim, Sun Ho; Kim, Ha Na; Kang, Jee Hee; Seo, Tae-Seok; Hwang, Hee Young; Kim, Hyung Sik; Cho, Hyuni.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 135-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yang, Dal Mo ; Kim, Sun Ho ; Kim, Ha Na ; Kang, Jee Hee ; Seo, Tae-Seok ; Hwang, Hee Young ; Kim, Hyung Sik ; Cho, Hyuni. / Differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions with gray scale sonographic, color doppler sonographic, and clinical features. In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 135-142.
@article{27adb027bca34b0f956bb6a3b9b0a7be,
title = "Differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions with gray scale sonographic, color doppler sonographic, and clinical features",
abstract = "Objective. To determine whether focal epididymal lesions can be differentiated on gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of 60 focal epididymal lesions in 57 patients. Focal epididymal lesions were classified into 3 groups: nonspecific epididymitis (n = 43), tuberculous epididymitis (n = 10), and benign epididymal masses (n = 7). The following gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features were analyzed: size, location, echogenicity, and heterogeneity of the lesion; hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim presence; hydrocele presence; degree of blood flow in the lesion; patient's age; duration of symptoms; and scrotal tenderness. Results. Lesions were larger in patients with tuberculous epididymitis than in those with either nonspecific epididymitis (P = .007) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0017). The hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim of the lesion was more common in patients with benign epididymal masses than in those with nonspecific epididymitis (P = .002). The degree of blood flow in the lesion was greater in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P = .0019) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). The duration of symptoms was shorter in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0092). The frequency of scrotal tenderness was higher in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). Conclusions. Gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and some clinical features may be helpful for differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions.",
keywords = "Doppler sonography, Epididymal tumors, Epididymis, Epididymitis, Sonography",
author = "Yang, {Dal Mo} and Kim, {Sun Ho} and Kim, {Ha Na} and Kang, {Jee Hee} and Tae-Seok Seo and Hwang, {Hee Young} and Kim, {Hyung Sik} and Hyuni Cho",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/jum.2003.22.2.135",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "135--142",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions with gray scale sonographic, color doppler sonographic, and clinical features

AU - Yang, Dal Mo

AU - Kim, Sun Ho

AU - Kim, Ha Na

AU - Kang, Jee Hee

AU - Seo, Tae-Seok

AU - Hwang, Hee Young

AU - Kim, Hyung Sik

AU - Cho, Hyuni

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Objective. To determine whether focal epididymal lesions can be differentiated on gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of 60 focal epididymal lesions in 57 patients. Focal epididymal lesions were classified into 3 groups: nonspecific epididymitis (n = 43), tuberculous epididymitis (n = 10), and benign epididymal masses (n = 7). The following gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features were analyzed: size, location, echogenicity, and heterogeneity of the lesion; hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim presence; hydrocele presence; degree of blood flow in the lesion; patient's age; duration of symptoms; and scrotal tenderness. Results. Lesions were larger in patients with tuberculous epididymitis than in those with either nonspecific epididymitis (P = .007) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0017). The hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim of the lesion was more common in patients with benign epididymal masses than in those with nonspecific epididymitis (P = .002). The degree of blood flow in the lesion was greater in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P = .0019) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). The duration of symptoms was shorter in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0092). The frequency of scrotal tenderness was higher in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). Conclusions. Gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and some clinical features may be helpful for differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions.

AB - Objective. To determine whether focal epididymal lesions can be differentiated on gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of 60 focal epididymal lesions in 57 patients. Focal epididymal lesions were classified into 3 groups: nonspecific epididymitis (n = 43), tuberculous epididymitis (n = 10), and benign epididymal masses (n = 7). The following gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and clinical features were analyzed: size, location, echogenicity, and heterogeneity of the lesion; hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim presence; hydrocele presence; degree of blood flow in the lesion; patient's age; duration of symptoms; and scrotal tenderness. Results. Lesions were larger in patients with tuberculous epididymitis than in those with either nonspecific epididymitis (P = .007) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0017). The hypoechoic or hyperechoic rim of the lesion was more common in patients with benign epididymal masses than in those with nonspecific epididymitis (P = .002). The degree of blood flow in the lesion was greater in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P = .0019) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). The duration of symptoms was shorter in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P = .0092). The frequency of scrotal tenderness was higher in patients with nonspecific epididymitis than in those with either tuberculous epididymitis (P < .001) or benign epididymal masses (P < .001). Conclusions. Gray scale sonographic, color Doppler sonographic, and some clinical features may be helpful for differential diagnosis of focal epididymal lesions.

KW - Doppler sonography

KW - Epididymal tumors

KW - Epididymis

KW - Epididymitis

KW - Sonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037306716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037306716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/jum.2003.22.2.135

DO - 10.7863/jum.2003.22.2.135

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 135

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 2

ER -