Divorce law reforms and divorce rates in the USA

An interactive fixed-effects approach

Dukpa Kim, Tatsushi Oka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

SUMMARY: This paper estimates the effects of unilateral divorce laws on divorce rates in the USA from a panel of state-level divorce rates. We use the interactive fixed-effects model to address the issue of endogeneity due to the association between cross-state unobserved heterogeneity and divorce law reforms. We document that earlier studies in the literature do not fully control for unobserved heterogeneity and result in mixed empirical evidence on the effects of divorce law reforms. While reconciling these conflicting results, our results suggest that divorce law reforms have temporal positive effects on divorce rates, thus confirming the 2006 findings of Wolfers. Via simulation experiments, we assess the degree to which faulty inclusion or faulty exclusion of interactive fixed effects affects the policy effect estimators. Our results suggest that faulty inclusion only results in efficiency loss whereas faulty exclusion causes bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-245
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Applied Econometrics
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar 1

Fingerprint

divorce law
law reform
divorce
exclusion
inclusion
Divorce
Fixed effects
Law reform
efficiency
simulation
cause
experiment
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Divorce law reforms and divorce rates in the USA : An interactive fixed-effects approach. / Kim, Dukpa; Oka, Tatsushi.

In: Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.03.2014, p. 231-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{42f999631f9e4542b22352ab5654e03d,
title = "Divorce law reforms and divorce rates in the USA: An interactive fixed-effects approach",
abstract = "SUMMARY: This paper estimates the effects of unilateral divorce laws on divorce rates in the USA from a panel of state-level divorce rates. We use the interactive fixed-effects model to address the issue of endogeneity due to the association between cross-state unobserved heterogeneity and divorce law reforms. We document that earlier studies in the literature do not fully control for unobserved heterogeneity and result in mixed empirical evidence on the effects of divorce law reforms. While reconciling these conflicting results, our results suggest that divorce law reforms have temporal positive effects on divorce rates, thus confirming the 2006 findings of Wolfers. Via simulation experiments, we assess the degree to which faulty inclusion or faulty exclusion of interactive fixed effects affects the policy effect estimators. Our results suggest that faulty inclusion only results in efficiency loss whereas faulty exclusion causes bias.",
author = "Dukpa Kim and Tatsushi Oka",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jae.2310",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "231--245",
journal = "Journal of Applied Econometrics",
issn = "0883-7252",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divorce law reforms and divorce rates in the USA

T2 - An interactive fixed-effects approach

AU - Kim, Dukpa

AU - Oka, Tatsushi

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - SUMMARY: This paper estimates the effects of unilateral divorce laws on divorce rates in the USA from a panel of state-level divorce rates. We use the interactive fixed-effects model to address the issue of endogeneity due to the association between cross-state unobserved heterogeneity and divorce law reforms. We document that earlier studies in the literature do not fully control for unobserved heterogeneity and result in mixed empirical evidence on the effects of divorce law reforms. While reconciling these conflicting results, our results suggest that divorce law reforms have temporal positive effects on divorce rates, thus confirming the 2006 findings of Wolfers. Via simulation experiments, we assess the degree to which faulty inclusion or faulty exclusion of interactive fixed effects affects the policy effect estimators. Our results suggest that faulty inclusion only results in efficiency loss whereas faulty exclusion causes bias.

AB - SUMMARY: This paper estimates the effects of unilateral divorce laws on divorce rates in the USA from a panel of state-level divorce rates. We use the interactive fixed-effects model to address the issue of endogeneity due to the association between cross-state unobserved heterogeneity and divorce law reforms. We document that earlier studies in the literature do not fully control for unobserved heterogeneity and result in mixed empirical evidence on the effects of divorce law reforms. While reconciling these conflicting results, our results suggest that divorce law reforms have temporal positive effects on divorce rates, thus confirming the 2006 findings of Wolfers. Via simulation experiments, we assess the degree to which faulty inclusion or faulty exclusion of interactive fixed effects affects the policy effect estimators. Our results suggest that faulty inclusion only results in efficiency loss whereas faulty exclusion causes bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896728179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896728179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jae.2310

DO - 10.1002/jae.2310

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 231

EP - 245

JO - Journal of Applied Econometrics

JF - Journal of Applied Econometrics

SN - 0883-7252

IS - 2

ER -