Does an intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return explain mean reversion in stock prices?

Chang-Jin Kim, James C. Morley, Charles R. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When volatility feedback is taken into account, there is strong evidence of a positive tradeoff between stock market volatility and expected returns on a market portfolio. In this paper, we ask whether this intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return is responsible for the reported evidence of mean reversion in stock prices. There are two relevant findings. First, price movements not related to the effects of Markov-switching market volatility are largely unpredictable over long horizons. Second, time-varying parameter estimates of the long-horizon predictability of stock returns reject any systematic mean reversion in favour of behaviour implicit in the historical timing of the tradeoff between risk and return.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-426
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Empirical Finance
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Risk and return
Trade-offs
Stock prices
Mean reversion
Market volatility
Time-varying parameters
Markov switching
Expected returns
Market portfolio
Predictability of stock returns
Volatility feedback
Stock market volatility

Keywords

  • G12
  • G14
  • Markov switching
  • Mean reversion
  • Time-varying parameter
  • Volatility feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

Does an intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return explain mean reversion in stock prices? / Kim, Chang-Jin; Morley, James C.; Nelson, Charles R.

In: Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.09.2001, p. 403-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{935a6fe53ead48f39813016a2de22c40,
title = "Does an intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return explain mean reversion in stock prices?",
abstract = "When volatility feedback is taken into account, there is strong evidence of a positive tradeoff between stock market volatility and expected returns on a market portfolio. In this paper, we ask whether this intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return is responsible for the reported evidence of mean reversion in stock prices. There are two relevant findings. First, price movements not related to the effects of Markov-switching market volatility are largely unpredictable over long horizons. Second, time-varying parameter estimates of the long-horizon predictability of stock returns reject any systematic mean reversion in favour of behaviour implicit in the historical timing of the tradeoff between risk and return.",
keywords = "G12, G14, Markov switching, Mean reversion, Time-varying parameter, Volatility feedback",
author = "Chang-Jin Kim and Morley, {James C.} and Nelson, {Charles R.}",
year = "2001",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0927-5398(01)00034-2",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "403--426",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Finance",
issn = "0927-5398",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does an intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return explain mean reversion in stock prices?

AU - Kim, Chang-Jin

AU - Morley, James C.

AU - Nelson, Charles R.

PY - 2001/9/1

Y1 - 2001/9/1

N2 - When volatility feedback is taken into account, there is strong evidence of a positive tradeoff between stock market volatility and expected returns on a market portfolio. In this paper, we ask whether this intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return is responsible for the reported evidence of mean reversion in stock prices. There are two relevant findings. First, price movements not related to the effects of Markov-switching market volatility are largely unpredictable over long horizons. Second, time-varying parameter estimates of the long-horizon predictability of stock returns reject any systematic mean reversion in favour of behaviour implicit in the historical timing of the tradeoff between risk and return.

AB - When volatility feedback is taken into account, there is strong evidence of a positive tradeoff between stock market volatility and expected returns on a market portfolio. In this paper, we ask whether this intertemporal tradeoff between risk and return is responsible for the reported evidence of mean reversion in stock prices. There are two relevant findings. First, price movements not related to the effects of Markov-switching market volatility are largely unpredictable over long horizons. Second, time-varying parameter estimates of the long-horizon predictability of stock returns reject any systematic mean reversion in favour of behaviour implicit in the historical timing of the tradeoff between risk and return.

KW - G12

KW - G14

KW - Markov switching

KW - Mean reversion

KW - Time-varying parameter

KW - Volatility feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041906640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041906640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0927-5398(01)00034-2

DO - 10.1016/S0927-5398(01)00034-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041906640

VL - 8

SP - 403

EP - 426

JO - Journal of Empirical Finance

JF - Journal of Empirical Finance

SN - 0927-5398

IS - 4

ER -