Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services

Björn Söderfeldt, Marie Söderfeldt, Kelvyn Jones, Patricia O'Campo, Carles Muntaner, Carl Göran Ohlson, Lars Erik Warg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The demand-control model (DC model) in occupational epidemiology suggests that health, an individual attribute, is partly determined by work organization, via the interplay of demand and control, job strain. The objective of this study was empirical assessment of the model's tenet of an organizational determination of individual health. An emerging analytic method, multi-level modelling, permits such an assessment The study encompasses two large Swedish human service organizations. It was based on a nationally representative sample of 291 local organizational units (level 2) with 8296 employees (level 1), a median of 18 employees per unit. 5730 persons (69.1%) completed the questionnaire. Listwise deletion of missing data left a net study base of 4756 individuals in 284 units. Missing data were largely random. Demand and control were measured by standard questions-and combined into a job strain index. Two such indices were calculated, one for quantitative demands and one for emotional demands. Individual attributes included age, gender, marital status, having children, social anchorage, and education. There were two dependent variables, self-assessed psychovegetative symptoms (worry, anxiousness, sadness, sleep difficulties, restlessness, and tension) and exhaustion (fatigue, feelings of being used up and overworked), both measured as summative indices. For psychovegetative health, a null model yielded 2.2% level 2 variance, unchanging when individual, attributes were included in a random intercepts model. Inclusion of the strain variables rendered level 2 Variance non-significant, decreasing level 1 variance by 23% and level 2 variance by 62%. For exhaustion, level 2 variation was 8.3% in the null model and 1.6% in the final model, with strain variables. The strain variables utilized in the DC-model thus draw a substantial part of their variation from the organizational level. It is concluded that the claim of the DC model to rely on organizational factors receives support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-534
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multilevel Analysis
multi-level analysis
Organizations
organization
demand
Health
Organizational Models
Psychomotor Agitation
Marital Status
Fatigue
Sleep
Emotions
Epidemiology
Education
health
employee
organizational unit
sleep
work organization
analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Development
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Söderfeldt, B., Söderfeldt, M., Jones, K., O'Campo, P., Muntaner, C., Ohlson, C. G., & Warg, L. E. (1997). Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services. Social Science and Medicine, 44(4), 527-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00179-7

Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services. / Söderfeldt, Björn; Söderfeldt, Marie; Jones, Kelvyn; O'Campo, Patricia; Muntaner, Carles; Ohlson, Carl Göran; Warg, Lars Erik.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.02.1997, p. 527-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Söderfeldt, B, Söderfeldt, M, Jones, K, O'Campo, P, Muntaner, C, Ohlson, CG & Warg, LE 1997, 'Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services', Social Science and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 527-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00179-7
Söderfeldt, Björn ; Söderfeldt, Marie ; Jones, Kelvyn ; O'Campo, Patricia ; Muntaner, Carles ; Ohlson, Carl Göran ; Warg, Lars Erik. / Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services. In: Social Science and Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 527-534.
@article{ea9b279a0f6e4b92aac091ecfbeb1115,
title = "Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services",
abstract = "The demand-control model (DC model) in occupational epidemiology suggests that health, an individual attribute, is partly determined by work organization, via the interplay of demand and control, job strain. The objective of this study was empirical assessment of the model's tenet of an organizational determination of individual health. An emerging analytic method, multi-level modelling, permits such an assessment The study encompasses two large Swedish human service organizations. It was based on a nationally representative sample of 291 local organizational units (level 2) with 8296 employees (level 1), a median of 18 employees per unit. 5730 persons (69.1{\%}) completed the questionnaire. Listwise deletion of missing data left a net study base of 4756 individuals in 284 units. Missing data were largely random. Demand and control were measured by standard questions-and combined into a job strain index. Two such indices were calculated, one for quantitative demands and one for emotional demands. Individual attributes included age, gender, marital status, having children, social anchorage, and education. There were two dependent variables, self-assessed psychovegetative symptoms (worry, anxiousness, sadness, sleep difficulties, restlessness, and tension) and exhaustion (fatigue, feelings of being used up and overworked), both measured as summative indices. For psychovegetative health, a null model yielded 2.2{\%} level 2 variance, unchanging when individual, attributes were included in a random intercepts model. Inclusion of the strain variables rendered level 2 Variance non-significant, decreasing level 1 variance by 23{\%} and level 2 variance by 62{\%}. For exhaustion, level 2 variation was 8.3{\%} in the null model and 1.6{\%} in the final model, with strain variables. The strain variables utilized in the DC-model thus draw a substantial part of their variation from the organizational level. It is concluded that the claim of the DC model to rely on organizational factors receives support.",
keywords = "Demand-control model, Human services, Multi-level analysis",
author = "Bj{\"o}rn S{\"o}derfeldt and Marie S{\"o}derfeldt and Kelvyn Jones and Patricia O'Campo and Carles Muntaner and Ohlson, {Carl G{\"o}ran} and Warg, {Lars Erik}",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00179-7",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "527--534",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services

AU - Söderfeldt, Björn

AU - Söderfeldt, Marie

AU - Jones, Kelvyn

AU - O'Campo, Patricia

AU - Muntaner, Carles

AU - Ohlson, Carl Göran

AU - Warg, Lars Erik

PY - 1997/2/1

Y1 - 1997/2/1

N2 - The demand-control model (DC model) in occupational epidemiology suggests that health, an individual attribute, is partly determined by work organization, via the interplay of demand and control, job strain. The objective of this study was empirical assessment of the model's tenet of an organizational determination of individual health. An emerging analytic method, multi-level modelling, permits such an assessment The study encompasses two large Swedish human service organizations. It was based on a nationally representative sample of 291 local organizational units (level 2) with 8296 employees (level 1), a median of 18 employees per unit. 5730 persons (69.1%) completed the questionnaire. Listwise deletion of missing data left a net study base of 4756 individuals in 284 units. Missing data were largely random. Demand and control were measured by standard questions-and combined into a job strain index. Two such indices were calculated, one for quantitative demands and one for emotional demands. Individual attributes included age, gender, marital status, having children, social anchorage, and education. There were two dependent variables, self-assessed psychovegetative symptoms (worry, anxiousness, sadness, sleep difficulties, restlessness, and tension) and exhaustion (fatigue, feelings of being used up and overworked), both measured as summative indices. For psychovegetative health, a null model yielded 2.2% level 2 variance, unchanging when individual, attributes were included in a random intercepts model. Inclusion of the strain variables rendered level 2 Variance non-significant, decreasing level 1 variance by 23% and level 2 variance by 62%. For exhaustion, level 2 variation was 8.3% in the null model and 1.6% in the final model, with strain variables. The strain variables utilized in the DC-model thus draw a substantial part of their variation from the organizational level. It is concluded that the claim of the DC model to rely on organizational factors receives support.

AB - The demand-control model (DC model) in occupational epidemiology suggests that health, an individual attribute, is partly determined by work organization, via the interplay of demand and control, job strain. The objective of this study was empirical assessment of the model's tenet of an organizational determination of individual health. An emerging analytic method, multi-level modelling, permits such an assessment The study encompasses two large Swedish human service organizations. It was based on a nationally representative sample of 291 local organizational units (level 2) with 8296 employees (level 1), a median of 18 employees per unit. 5730 persons (69.1%) completed the questionnaire. Listwise deletion of missing data left a net study base of 4756 individuals in 284 units. Missing data were largely random. Demand and control were measured by standard questions-and combined into a job strain index. Two such indices were calculated, one for quantitative demands and one for emotional demands. Individual attributes included age, gender, marital status, having children, social anchorage, and education. There were two dependent variables, self-assessed psychovegetative symptoms (worry, anxiousness, sadness, sleep difficulties, restlessness, and tension) and exhaustion (fatigue, feelings of being used up and overworked), both measured as summative indices. For psychovegetative health, a null model yielded 2.2% level 2 variance, unchanging when individual, attributes were included in a random intercepts model. Inclusion of the strain variables rendered level 2 Variance non-significant, decreasing level 1 variance by 23% and level 2 variance by 62%. For exhaustion, level 2 variation was 8.3% in the null model and 1.6% in the final model, with strain variables. The strain variables utilized in the DC-model thus draw a substantial part of their variation from the organizational level. It is concluded that the claim of the DC model to rely on organizational factors receives support.

KW - Demand-control model

KW - Human services

KW - Multi-level analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0343907769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0343907769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00179-7

DO - 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00179-7

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 527

EP - 534

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 4

ER -