Does the supplemental nutrition assistance program really increase obesity? The importance of accounting for misclassification errors

Achilleas Vassilopoulos, Andreas C. Drichoutis, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr, Panagiotis Lazaridis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity among US citizens has grown rapidly over the last few decades, especially among low-income individuals. This has led to questions about the effectiveness of nutritional assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Previous results on the effect of SNAP participation on obesity are mixed. These findings are however based on the assumption that participation status can be accurately observed, despite significant misclassification errors reported in the literature. Using propensity score matching, we conclude that there seems to be a positive effect of SNAP participation on obesity rates for female participants and no such effect for males, a result that is consistent with several previous studies. However, an extensive sensitivity analysis reveals that the positive effect for females is sensitive to misclassification errors and to the conditional independence assumption. Thus analogous findings should also be used with caution unless examined under the prism of classification errors and of other assumptions used for the identification of causal parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Statistics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017 Dec 20
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Misclassification Error
Obesity
Nutrition
Propensity Score
Conditional Independence
Prism
Sensitivity Analysis
Misclassification error
Participation
Program participation

Keywords

  • misclassification
  • obesity
  • propensity score matching
  • sensitivity analysis
  • SNAP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Does the supplemental nutrition assistance program really increase obesity? The importance of accounting for misclassification errors. / Vassilopoulos, Achilleas; Drichoutis, Andreas C.; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.; Lazaridis, Panagiotis.

In: Journal of Applied Statistics, 20.12.2017, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vassilopoulos, Achilleas ; Drichoutis, Andreas C. ; Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M. ; Lazaridis, Panagiotis. / Does the supplemental nutrition assistance program really increase obesity? The importance of accounting for misclassification errors. In: Journal of Applied Statistics. 2017 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{57a66487207c439ca0190642eb7b4e6d,
title = "Does the supplemental nutrition assistance program really increase obesity? The importance of accounting for misclassification errors",
abstract = "The prevalence of obesity among US citizens has grown rapidly over the last few decades, especially among low-income individuals. This has led to questions about the effectiveness of nutritional assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Previous results on the effect of SNAP participation on obesity are mixed. These findings are however based on the assumption that participation status can be accurately observed, despite significant misclassification errors reported in the literature. Using propensity score matching, we conclude that there seems to be a positive effect of SNAP participation on obesity rates for female participants and no such effect for males, a result that is consistent with several previous studies. However, an extensive sensitivity analysis reveals that the positive effect for females is sensitive to misclassification errors and to the conditional independence assumption. Thus analogous findings should also be used with caution unless examined under the prism of classification errors and of other assumptions used for the identification of causal parameters.",
keywords = "misclassification, obesity, propensity score matching, sensitivity analysis, SNAP",
author = "Achilleas Vassilopoulos and Drichoutis, {Andreas C.} and {Nayga, Jr}, {Rodolfo M.} and Panagiotis Lazaridis",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/02664763.2017.1414165",
language = "English",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Applied Statistics",
issn = "0266-4763",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the supplemental nutrition assistance program really increase obesity? The importance of accounting for misclassification errors

AU - Vassilopoulos, Achilleas

AU - Drichoutis, Andreas C.

AU - Nayga, Jr, Rodolfo M.

AU - Lazaridis, Panagiotis

PY - 2017/12/20

Y1 - 2017/12/20

N2 - The prevalence of obesity among US citizens has grown rapidly over the last few decades, especially among low-income individuals. This has led to questions about the effectiveness of nutritional assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Previous results on the effect of SNAP participation on obesity are mixed. These findings are however based on the assumption that participation status can be accurately observed, despite significant misclassification errors reported in the literature. Using propensity score matching, we conclude that there seems to be a positive effect of SNAP participation on obesity rates for female participants and no such effect for males, a result that is consistent with several previous studies. However, an extensive sensitivity analysis reveals that the positive effect for females is sensitive to misclassification errors and to the conditional independence assumption. Thus analogous findings should also be used with caution unless examined under the prism of classification errors and of other assumptions used for the identification of causal parameters.

AB - The prevalence of obesity among US citizens has grown rapidly over the last few decades, especially among low-income individuals. This has led to questions about the effectiveness of nutritional assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Previous results on the effect of SNAP participation on obesity are mixed. These findings are however based on the assumption that participation status can be accurately observed, despite significant misclassification errors reported in the literature. Using propensity score matching, we conclude that there seems to be a positive effect of SNAP participation on obesity rates for female participants and no such effect for males, a result that is consistent with several previous studies. However, an extensive sensitivity analysis reveals that the positive effect for females is sensitive to misclassification errors and to the conditional independence assumption. Thus analogous findings should also be used with caution unless examined under the prism of classification errors and of other assumptions used for the identification of causal parameters.

KW - misclassification

KW - obesity

KW - propensity score matching

KW - sensitivity analysis

KW - SNAP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038375748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038375748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02664763.2017.1414165

DO - 10.1080/02664763.2017.1414165

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038375748

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Applied Statistics

JF - Journal of Applied Statistics

SN - 0266-4763

ER -