Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program

Youngyih Han, Eun Hyuk Shin, Chunil Lim, Se Kwon Kang, Sung Ho Park, Jeong Eun Lah, Tae Suk Suh, Myonggeun Yoon, Se Byeong Lee, Sang Hyun Cho, Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Sang Gyu Ju, Yong Chan Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An accurate delivery of prescribed dose is essential to ensure the most successful outcome from advanced radiation treatments such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). An anthropomorphic phantom was designed and constructed to conduct a remote-audit program for IMRT treatments. The accuracy of the dosimetry in the phantom was assessed by comparing the results obtained from different detectors with those from Monte Carlo calculations. The developed phantom has a shape of a cylinder with one target and three organs at risk (OARs) inside the unit. The target and OARs were shaped similar to those of nasopharyngeal cancer patients, and manufactured for their identification during computed tomography imaging. The phantom was designed with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) holders that were inserted inside the target and the OARs for the measurements of absolute dose. In addition, the phantom allowed measurements with ionization chambers placed at the TLD locations. As a result, an inter-comparison between the two types of dosimeters was possible. For the measurement of the relative dose distribution across the target and OARs, two film slots were orthogonally placed near the center of the phantom, which also enabled the insertion of inhomogeneities near the target. Measurements with TLDs, provided by Korea Food and Drug Administration and Radiological Physics Center, and measurements with an ionization chamber (IC) were performed in four cases. The first case was one anterior field of 6 MV x rays delivered to the phantom; the second case used the same anterior field, but with inhomogeneities inserted into the phantom. The third case was three fields of 6 MV beams at an equi-gantry angle for the homogeneous phantom, and the fourth case was IMRT delivery to the phantom without inhomogeneities. For each case, measurements with both TLDs and IC were performed. For cases 1-3, theoretical predictions were obtained by using the Monte Carlo (MC) codes (BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc6.0). The TLD measurements were larger than the IC readings by 2.2% (1.3-2.5%), 2.2% (1.2-2.9%), and 2.1% (0-3.3%) on average for case 1, case 2 and case 3, respectively. The average deviation between TLDs and MC results was 0.97% (-0.13-2.07%) for the first case, 1.27% (0.34-2.18%) for the second case, and 1.13% (0.31-1.94%) for the third case. The IC reading was less than the MC results; the average deviations were -1.2% (-2.44 - 0.43%), -0.96% (-1.74 - 0.54%) and -0.94% (-1.53-0.27%) for the first, second, and third cases, respectively. For the IMRT case, the average deviation between IC readings and TLD measurements was 0.5% (-7.0-3.9%). In conclusion, the TLD measurements in the developed phantom agreed with IC and MC results with less than 3% of an average difference. The developed phantom with TLD dosimeters should be useful for remote monitoring of IMRT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2519-2527
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 3
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Organs at Risk
Reading
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Radiation Dosimeters
Physics
United States Food and Drug Administration
Korea
Tomography
X-Rays
Radiation
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • IMRT
  • Phantom
  • Quality assurance
  • Remote monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Han, Y., Shin, E. H., Lim, C., Kang, S. K., Park, S. H., Lah, J. E., ... Ahn, Y. C. (2008). Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program. Medical Physics, 35(6), 2519-2527. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2903440

Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program. / Han, Youngyih; Shin, Eun Hyuk; Lim, Chunil; Kang, Se Kwon; Park, Sung Ho; Lah, Jeong Eun; Suh, Tae Suk; Yoon, Myonggeun; Lee, Se Byeong; Cho, Sang Hyun; Ibbott, Geoffrey S.; Ju, Sang Gyu; Ahn, Yong Chan.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 03.06.2008, p. 2519-2527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, Y, Shin, EH, Lim, C, Kang, SK, Park, SH, Lah, JE, Suh, TS, Yoon, M, Lee, SB, Cho, SH, Ibbott, GS, Ju, SG & Ahn, YC 2008, 'Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program', Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2519-2527. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2903440
Han Y, Shin EH, Lim C, Kang SK, Park SH, Lah JE et al. Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program. Medical Physics. 2008 Jun 3;35(6):2519-2527. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2903440
Han, Youngyih ; Shin, Eun Hyuk ; Lim, Chunil ; Kang, Se Kwon ; Park, Sung Ho ; Lah, Jeong Eun ; Suh, Tae Suk ; Yoon, Myonggeun ; Lee, Se Byeong ; Cho, Sang Hyun ; Ibbott, Geoffrey S. ; Ju, Sang Gyu ; Ahn, Yong Chan. / Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program. In: Medical Physics. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 2519-2527.
@article{dd5cbde66e844f9e9f4c5d0269e028cc,
title = "Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program",
abstract = "An accurate delivery of prescribed dose is essential to ensure the most successful outcome from advanced radiation treatments such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). An anthropomorphic phantom was designed and constructed to conduct a remote-audit program for IMRT treatments. The accuracy of the dosimetry in the phantom was assessed by comparing the results obtained from different detectors with those from Monte Carlo calculations. The developed phantom has a shape of a cylinder with one target and three organs at risk (OARs) inside the unit. The target and OARs were shaped similar to those of nasopharyngeal cancer patients, and manufactured for their identification during computed tomography imaging. The phantom was designed with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) holders that were inserted inside the target and the OARs for the measurements of absolute dose. In addition, the phantom allowed measurements with ionization chambers placed at the TLD locations. As a result, an inter-comparison between the two types of dosimeters was possible. For the measurement of the relative dose distribution across the target and OARs, two film slots were orthogonally placed near the center of the phantom, which also enabled the insertion of inhomogeneities near the target. Measurements with TLDs, provided by Korea Food and Drug Administration and Radiological Physics Center, and measurements with an ionization chamber (IC) were performed in four cases. The first case was one anterior field of 6 MV x rays delivered to the phantom; the second case used the same anterior field, but with inhomogeneities inserted into the phantom. The third case was three fields of 6 MV beams at an equi-gantry angle for the homogeneous phantom, and the fourth case was IMRT delivery to the phantom without inhomogeneities. For each case, measurements with both TLDs and IC were performed. For cases 1-3, theoretical predictions were obtained by using the Monte Carlo (MC) codes (BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc6.0). The TLD measurements were larger than the IC readings by 2.2{\%} (1.3-2.5{\%}), 2.2{\%} (1.2-2.9{\%}), and 2.1{\%} (0-3.3{\%}) on average for case 1, case 2 and case 3, respectively. The average deviation between TLDs and MC results was 0.97{\%} (-0.13-2.07{\%}) for the first case, 1.27{\%} (0.34-2.18{\%}) for the second case, and 1.13{\%} (0.31-1.94{\%}) for the third case. The IC reading was less than the MC results; the average deviations were -1.2{\%} (-2.44 - 0.43{\%}), -0.96{\%} (-1.74 - 0.54{\%}) and -0.94{\%} (-1.53-0.27{\%}) for the first, second, and third cases, respectively. For the IMRT case, the average deviation between IC readings and TLD measurements was 0.5{\%} (-7.0-3.9{\%}). In conclusion, the TLD measurements in the developed phantom agreed with IC and MC results with less than 3{\%} of an average difference. The developed phantom with TLD dosimeters should be useful for remote monitoring of IMRT.",
keywords = "IMRT, Phantom, Quality assurance, Remote monitoring",
author = "Youngyih Han and Shin, {Eun Hyuk} and Chunil Lim and Kang, {Se Kwon} and Park, {Sung Ho} and Lah, {Jeong Eun} and Suh, {Tae Suk} and Myonggeun Yoon and Lee, {Se Byeong} and Cho, {Sang Hyun} and Ibbott, {Geoffrey S.} and Ju, {Sang Gyu} and Ahn, {Yong Chan}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1118/1.2903440",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "2519--2527",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program

AU - Han, Youngyih

AU - Shin, Eun Hyuk

AU - Lim, Chunil

AU - Kang, Se Kwon

AU - Park, Sung Ho

AU - Lah, Jeong Eun

AU - Suh, Tae Suk

AU - Yoon, Myonggeun

AU - Lee, Se Byeong

AU - Cho, Sang Hyun

AU - Ibbott, Geoffrey S.

AU - Ju, Sang Gyu

AU - Ahn, Yong Chan

PY - 2008/6/3

Y1 - 2008/6/3

N2 - An accurate delivery of prescribed dose is essential to ensure the most successful outcome from advanced radiation treatments such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). An anthropomorphic phantom was designed and constructed to conduct a remote-audit program for IMRT treatments. The accuracy of the dosimetry in the phantom was assessed by comparing the results obtained from different detectors with those from Monte Carlo calculations. The developed phantom has a shape of a cylinder with one target and three organs at risk (OARs) inside the unit. The target and OARs were shaped similar to those of nasopharyngeal cancer patients, and manufactured for their identification during computed tomography imaging. The phantom was designed with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) holders that were inserted inside the target and the OARs for the measurements of absolute dose. In addition, the phantom allowed measurements with ionization chambers placed at the TLD locations. As a result, an inter-comparison between the two types of dosimeters was possible. For the measurement of the relative dose distribution across the target and OARs, two film slots were orthogonally placed near the center of the phantom, which also enabled the insertion of inhomogeneities near the target. Measurements with TLDs, provided by Korea Food and Drug Administration and Radiological Physics Center, and measurements with an ionization chamber (IC) were performed in four cases. The first case was one anterior field of 6 MV x rays delivered to the phantom; the second case used the same anterior field, but with inhomogeneities inserted into the phantom. The third case was three fields of 6 MV beams at an equi-gantry angle for the homogeneous phantom, and the fourth case was IMRT delivery to the phantom without inhomogeneities. For each case, measurements with both TLDs and IC were performed. For cases 1-3, theoretical predictions were obtained by using the Monte Carlo (MC) codes (BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc6.0). The TLD measurements were larger than the IC readings by 2.2% (1.3-2.5%), 2.2% (1.2-2.9%), and 2.1% (0-3.3%) on average for case 1, case 2 and case 3, respectively. The average deviation between TLDs and MC results was 0.97% (-0.13-2.07%) for the first case, 1.27% (0.34-2.18%) for the second case, and 1.13% (0.31-1.94%) for the third case. The IC reading was less than the MC results; the average deviations were -1.2% (-2.44 - 0.43%), -0.96% (-1.74 - 0.54%) and -0.94% (-1.53-0.27%) for the first, second, and third cases, respectively. For the IMRT case, the average deviation between IC readings and TLD measurements was 0.5% (-7.0-3.9%). In conclusion, the TLD measurements in the developed phantom agreed with IC and MC results with less than 3% of an average difference. The developed phantom with TLD dosimeters should be useful for remote monitoring of IMRT.

AB - An accurate delivery of prescribed dose is essential to ensure the most successful outcome from advanced radiation treatments such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). An anthropomorphic phantom was designed and constructed to conduct a remote-audit program for IMRT treatments. The accuracy of the dosimetry in the phantom was assessed by comparing the results obtained from different detectors with those from Monte Carlo calculations. The developed phantom has a shape of a cylinder with one target and three organs at risk (OARs) inside the unit. The target and OARs were shaped similar to those of nasopharyngeal cancer patients, and manufactured for their identification during computed tomography imaging. The phantom was designed with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) holders that were inserted inside the target and the OARs for the measurements of absolute dose. In addition, the phantom allowed measurements with ionization chambers placed at the TLD locations. As a result, an inter-comparison between the two types of dosimeters was possible. For the measurement of the relative dose distribution across the target and OARs, two film slots were orthogonally placed near the center of the phantom, which also enabled the insertion of inhomogeneities near the target. Measurements with TLDs, provided by Korea Food and Drug Administration and Radiological Physics Center, and measurements with an ionization chamber (IC) were performed in four cases. The first case was one anterior field of 6 MV x rays delivered to the phantom; the second case used the same anterior field, but with inhomogeneities inserted into the phantom. The third case was three fields of 6 MV beams at an equi-gantry angle for the homogeneous phantom, and the fourth case was IMRT delivery to the phantom without inhomogeneities. For each case, measurements with both TLDs and IC were performed. For cases 1-3, theoretical predictions were obtained by using the Monte Carlo (MC) codes (BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc6.0). The TLD measurements were larger than the IC readings by 2.2% (1.3-2.5%), 2.2% (1.2-2.9%), and 2.1% (0-3.3%) on average for case 1, case 2 and case 3, respectively. The average deviation between TLDs and MC results was 0.97% (-0.13-2.07%) for the first case, 1.27% (0.34-2.18%) for the second case, and 1.13% (0.31-1.94%) for the third case. The IC reading was less than the MC results; the average deviations were -1.2% (-2.44 - 0.43%), -0.96% (-1.74 - 0.54%) and -0.94% (-1.53-0.27%) for the first, second, and third cases, respectively. For the IMRT case, the average deviation between IC readings and TLD measurements was 0.5% (-7.0-3.9%). In conclusion, the TLD measurements in the developed phantom agreed with IC and MC results with less than 3% of an average difference. The developed phantom with TLD dosimeters should be useful for remote monitoring of IMRT.

KW - IMRT

KW - Phantom

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Remote monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449092031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449092031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2903440

DO - 10.1118/1.2903440

M3 - Article

C2 - 18649485

AN - SCOPUS:44449092031

VL - 35

SP - 2519

EP - 2527

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -