Duration of acute kidney injury and mortality in critically ill patients

A retrospective observational study

Seung Seok Han, Sejoong Kim, Shin Young Ahn, Jeonghwan Lee, Dong Ki Kim, Ho Jun Chin, Dong Wan Chae, Ki Young Na

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The addition of relevant parameters to acute kidney injury (AKI) criteria might allow better prediction of patient mortality than AKI criteria alone. Here, we evaluated whether inclusion of AKI duration could address this issue. Methods. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines in 2,143 critically ill patients, within 15 days of patient admission. AKI cases were categorized according to tertiles of AKI duration: 1st tertile, 1-2 days; 2nd tertile, 3-5 days; and 3rd tertile, ≥6 days. The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival rates in three groups were calculated after adjustment for multiple covariates compared with ICU patients without AKI as the reference group. The predictive ability for mortality was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: AKI increased the HRs for overall mortality, and the mortality rate increased with AKI duration: the adjusted HRs were 1.99 (1st tertile), 2.67 (2nd tertile), and 2.85 (3 rd tertile) compared with the non-AKI group (all Ps < 0.001). The AUC of the ROC curve for overall mortality based on the AKI duration groups (0.716) was higher than the AUC of AKI staging using the KDIGO guidelines (0.696) (P = 0.001). When considering KDIGO stage and AKI duration together, the AUC (0.717) was also significantly higher than that using the KDIGO stage alone (P < 0.001). Conclusions: AKI duration is an additional parameter for the prediction of mortality in critically ill patients. The inclusion of AKI duration could be considered as a refinement of the AKI criteria.

Original languageEnglish
Article number133
JournalBMC Nephrology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jul 2
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acute Kidney Injury
Critical Illness
Observational Studies
Retrospective Studies
Mortality
Kidney Diseases
Area Under Curve
ROC Curve
Guidelines
Patient Admission
Survival Rate

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Acute renal failure
  • Duration
  • Mortality
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Duration of acute kidney injury and mortality in critically ill patients : A retrospective observational study. / Han, Seung Seok; Kim, Sejoong; Ahn, Shin Young; Lee, Jeonghwan; Kim, Dong Ki; Chin, Ho Jun; Chae, Dong Wan; Na, Ki Young.

In: BMC Nephrology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 133, 02.07.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, Seung Seok ; Kim, Sejoong ; Ahn, Shin Young ; Lee, Jeonghwan ; Kim, Dong Ki ; Chin, Ho Jun ; Chae, Dong Wan ; Na, Ki Young. / Duration of acute kidney injury and mortality in critically ill patients : A retrospective observational study. In: BMC Nephrology. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{443c2e91f16d405bb9b8a2131f7c4dee,
title = "Duration of acute kidney injury and mortality in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study",
abstract = "Background: The addition of relevant parameters to acute kidney injury (AKI) criteria might allow better prediction of patient mortality than AKI criteria alone. Here, we evaluated whether inclusion of AKI duration could address this issue. Methods. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines in 2,143 critically ill patients, within 15 days of patient admission. AKI cases were categorized according to tertiles of AKI duration: 1st tertile, 1-2 days; 2nd tertile, 3-5 days; and 3rd tertile, ≥6 days. The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival rates in three groups were calculated after adjustment for multiple covariates compared with ICU patients without AKI as the reference group. The predictive ability for mortality was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: AKI increased the HRs for overall mortality, and the mortality rate increased with AKI duration: the adjusted HRs were 1.99 (1st tertile), 2.67 (2nd tertile), and 2.85 (3 rd tertile) compared with the non-AKI group (all Ps < 0.001). The AUC of the ROC curve for overall mortality based on the AKI duration groups (0.716) was higher than the AUC of AKI staging using the KDIGO guidelines (0.696) (P = 0.001). When considering KDIGO stage and AKI duration together, the AUC (0.717) was also significantly higher than that using the KDIGO stage alone (P < 0.001). Conclusions: AKI duration is an additional parameter for the prediction of mortality in critically ill patients. The inclusion of AKI duration could be considered as a refinement of the AKI criteria.",
keywords = "Acute kidney injury, Acute renal failure, Duration, Mortality, Survival",
author = "Han, {Seung Seok} and Sejoong Kim and Ahn, {Shin Young} and Jeonghwan Lee and Kim, {Dong Ki} and Chin, {Ho Jun} and Chae, {Dong Wan} and Na, {Ki Young}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2369-14-133",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "BMC Nephrology",
issn = "1471-2369",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Duration of acute kidney injury and mortality in critically ill patients

T2 - A retrospective observational study

AU - Han, Seung Seok

AU - Kim, Sejoong

AU - Ahn, Shin Young

AU - Lee, Jeonghwan

AU - Kim, Dong Ki

AU - Chin, Ho Jun

AU - Chae, Dong Wan

AU - Na, Ki Young

PY - 2013/7/2

Y1 - 2013/7/2

N2 - Background: The addition of relevant parameters to acute kidney injury (AKI) criteria might allow better prediction of patient mortality than AKI criteria alone. Here, we evaluated whether inclusion of AKI duration could address this issue. Methods. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines in 2,143 critically ill patients, within 15 days of patient admission. AKI cases were categorized according to tertiles of AKI duration: 1st tertile, 1-2 days; 2nd tertile, 3-5 days; and 3rd tertile, ≥6 days. The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival rates in three groups were calculated after adjustment for multiple covariates compared with ICU patients without AKI as the reference group. The predictive ability for mortality was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: AKI increased the HRs for overall mortality, and the mortality rate increased with AKI duration: the adjusted HRs were 1.99 (1st tertile), 2.67 (2nd tertile), and 2.85 (3 rd tertile) compared with the non-AKI group (all Ps < 0.001). The AUC of the ROC curve for overall mortality based on the AKI duration groups (0.716) was higher than the AUC of AKI staging using the KDIGO guidelines (0.696) (P = 0.001). When considering KDIGO stage and AKI duration together, the AUC (0.717) was also significantly higher than that using the KDIGO stage alone (P < 0.001). Conclusions: AKI duration is an additional parameter for the prediction of mortality in critically ill patients. The inclusion of AKI duration could be considered as a refinement of the AKI criteria.

AB - Background: The addition of relevant parameters to acute kidney injury (AKI) criteria might allow better prediction of patient mortality than AKI criteria alone. Here, we evaluated whether inclusion of AKI duration could address this issue. Methods. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines in 2,143 critically ill patients, within 15 days of patient admission. AKI cases were categorized according to tertiles of AKI duration: 1st tertile, 1-2 days; 2nd tertile, 3-5 days; and 3rd tertile, ≥6 days. The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival rates in three groups were calculated after adjustment for multiple covariates compared with ICU patients without AKI as the reference group. The predictive ability for mortality was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: AKI increased the HRs for overall mortality, and the mortality rate increased with AKI duration: the adjusted HRs were 1.99 (1st tertile), 2.67 (2nd tertile), and 2.85 (3 rd tertile) compared with the non-AKI group (all Ps < 0.001). The AUC of the ROC curve for overall mortality based on the AKI duration groups (0.716) was higher than the AUC of AKI staging using the KDIGO guidelines (0.696) (P = 0.001). When considering KDIGO stage and AKI duration together, the AUC (0.717) was also significantly higher than that using the KDIGO stage alone (P < 0.001). Conclusions: AKI duration is an additional parameter for the prediction of mortality in critically ill patients. The inclusion of AKI duration could be considered as a refinement of the AKI criteria.

KW - Acute kidney injury

KW - Acute renal failure

KW - Duration

KW - Mortality

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879456159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879456159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2369-14-133

DO - 10.1186/1471-2369-14-133

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - BMC Nephrology

JF - BMC Nephrology

SN - 1471-2369

IS - 1

M1 - 133

ER -