TY - JOUR
T1 - Early postoperative overcorrection in recurrent exotropia
AU - Ha, Suk Gyu
AU - Kim, Seung Hyun
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Objective To investigate the surgical outcome according to the angle of deviation at postoperative day 1 in patients with recurrent exotropia Design Retrospective case series Methods Surgical outcome in patients with recurrent exotropia for at least 1 year was analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to the angle of deviation at postoperative day 1: overcorrection group (≥2 prism diopter [PD] of esodeviation), orthotropic group (orthotropia or <5 PD of exodeviation), and undercorrection group (≥5 PD of exodeviation). Success was defined as ≤5 PD of esodeviation or ≤10 PD of exodeviation at the final visit. Results One hundred and six patients were included in this study. Age at surgery was 11.8 ± 6.9 years, and preoperative angle of deviation was 22.9 ± 6.3 PD at distant. Patients were followed-up for 24.4 ± 12.8 months. There were 20 (18.9%), 82 (77.4%), and 4 (3.8%) patients in overcorrection, orthotropic, and undercorrection groups at postoperative day 1 (p = 0.001). The surgical success rate at the final visit in the overcorrection group (95%) was higher than that in orthotropic and undercorrection groups (76.8% and 25%, respectively, p = 0.004). In univariate regression analysis, overcorrection at postoperative day 1 was the only reliable factor for long-term success (odds ratio [OR] = 24.101, p = 0.01). Conclusion Overcorrection at postoperative day 1 is a good surgical predictor of successful outcome in surgery for recurrent exotropia.
AB - Objective To investigate the surgical outcome according to the angle of deviation at postoperative day 1 in patients with recurrent exotropia Design Retrospective case series Methods Surgical outcome in patients with recurrent exotropia for at least 1 year was analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to the angle of deviation at postoperative day 1: overcorrection group (≥2 prism diopter [PD] of esodeviation), orthotropic group (orthotropia or <5 PD of exodeviation), and undercorrection group (≥5 PD of exodeviation). Success was defined as ≤5 PD of esodeviation or ≤10 PD of exodeviation at the final visit. Results One hundred and six patients were included in this study. Age at surgery was 11.8 ± 6.9 years, and preoperative angle of deviation was 22.9 ± 6.3 PD at distant. Patients were followed-up for 24.4 ± 12.8 months. There were 20 (18.9%), 82 (77.4%), and 4 (3.8%) patients in overcorrection, orthotropic, and undercorrection groups at postoperative day 1 (p = 0.001). The surgical success rate at the final visit in the overcorrection group (95%) was higher than that in orthotropic and undercorrection groups (76.8% and 25%, respectively, p = 0.004). In univariate regression analysis, overcorrection at postoperative day 1 was the only reliable factor for long-term success (odds ratio [OR] = 24.101, p = 0.01). Conclusion Overcorrection at postoperative day 1 is a good surgical predictor of successful outcome in surgery for recurrent exotropia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026740892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026740892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.05.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.05.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 29217031
AN - SCOPUS:85026740892
SN - 0008-4182
VL - 52
SP - 611
EP - 615
JO - Transactions of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society
JF - Transactions of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society
IS - 6
ER -