Effect of Lumbar Flexion on the Extent of Epidural Blockade

Jin Tae Kim, Jong Hwan Lee, Seung-Zhoo Yoon, Young Jin Lim, Jae Hyon Bahk, Chong Sung Kim, Yunseok Jeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study examined the effect of lumbar flexion on the extent of the epidural block during lumbar epidural anesthesia. Methods: The epidural catheter was introduced at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side down. After administering a test drug (3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 15 μg of epinephrine), the patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: Group F (n = 16, lumbar spine flexed) and Group N (n = 17, lumbar spine in the neutral position). In both groups, 2% lidocaine (16 mL) mixed with sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter while the patient maintained the lateral decubitus position with the lumbar spine either flexed or in the neutral position. All the patients maintained their respective positions for 5 minutes and were subsequently turned to the supine position. The pinprick block level and the degree of motor blockade were assessed every 10 minutes for 60 minutes after administering the local anesthetics. A 2-dermatomal difference in uppermost block between groups was determined to be clinically significant. Results: The median difference between groups in the uppermost pinprick block level was only 1.5 dermatomes and it did not satisfy our criteria for clinical significance. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the lowermost pinprick block level and the degree of motor block. Conclusions: Lumbar flexion has no clinically relevant effect on sensory spread during epidural anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-474
Number of pages4
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Epidural Anesthesia
Lidocaine
Catheters
Sodium Bicarbonate
Supine Position
Local Anesthetics
Epinephrine
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Anesthesia
  • Epidural
  • Lidocaine
  • Lumbar flexion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Kim, J. T., Lee, J. H., Yoon, S-Z., Lim, Y. J., Bahk, J. H., Kim, C. S., & Jeon, Y. (2007). Effect of Lumbar Flexion on the Extent of Epidural Blockade. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 32(6), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.010

Effect of Lumbar Flexion on the Extent of Epidural Blockade. / Kim, Jin Tae; Lee, Jong Hwan; Yoon, Seung-Zhoo; Lim, Young Jin; Bahk, Jae Hyon; Kim, Chong Sung; Jeon, Yunseok.

In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.11.2007, p. 471-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Jin Tae ; Lee, Jong Hwan ; Yoon, Seung-Zhoo ; Lim, Young Jin ; Bahk, Jae Hyon ; Kim, Chong Sung ; Jeon, Yunseok. / Effect of Lumbar Flexion on the Extent of Epidural Blockade. In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 471-474.
@article{fcd6fc25f2db42dfbc1dba4cec0d5410,
title = "Effect of Lumbar Flexion on the Extent of Epidural Blockade",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: This study examined the effect of lumbar flexion on the extent of the epidural block during lumbar epidural anesthesia. Methods: The epidural catheter was introduced at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side down. After administering a test drug (3 mL of 2{\%} lidocaine and 15 μg of epinephrine), the patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: Group F (n = 16, lumbar spine flexed) and Group N (n = 17, lumbar spine in the neutral position). In both groups, 2{\%} lidocaine (16 mL) mixed with sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter while the patient maintained the lateral decubitus position with the lumbar spine either flexed or in the neutral position. All the patients maintained their respective positions for 5 minutes and were subsequently turned to the supine position. The pinprick block level and the degree of motor blockade were assessed every 10 minutes for 60 minutes after administering the local anesthetics. A 2-dermatomal difference in uppermost block between groups was determined to be clinically significant. Results: The median difference between groups in the uppermost pinprick block level was only 1.5 dermatomes and it did not satisfy our criteria for clinical significance. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the lowermost pinprick block level and the degree of motor block. Conclusions: Lumbar flexion has no clinically relevant effect on sensory spread during epidural anesthesia.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, Epidural, Lidocaine, Lumbar flexion",
author = "Kim, {Jin Tae} and Lee, {Jong Hwan} and Seung-Zhoo Yoon and Lim, {Young Jin} and Bahk, {Jae Hyon} and Kim, {Chong Sung} and Yunseok Jeon",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.010",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "471--474",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "1098-7339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Lumbar Flexion on the Extent of Epidural Blockade

AU - Kim, Jin Tae

AU - Lee, Jong Hwan

AU - Yoon, Seung-Zhoo

AU - Lim, Young Jin

AU - Bahk, Jae Hyon

AU - Kim, Chong Sung

AU - Jeon, Yunseok

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: This study examined the effect of lumbar flexion on the extent of the epidural block during lumbar epidural anesthesia. Methods: The epidural catheter was introduced at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side down. After administering a test drug (3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 15 μg of epinephrine), the patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: Group F (n = 16, lumbar spine flexed) and Group N (n = 17, lumbar spine in the neutral position). In both groups, 2% lidocaine (16 mL) mixed with sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter while the patient maintained the lateral decubitus position with the lumbar spine either flexed or in the neutral position. All the patients maintained their respective positions for 5 minutes and were subsequently turned to the supine position. The pinprick block level and the degree of motor blockade were assessed every 10 minutes for 60 minutes after administering the local anesthetics. A 2-dermatomal difference in uppermost block between groups was determined to be clinically significant. Results: The median difference between groups in the uppermost pinprick block level was only 1.5 dermatomes and it did not satisfy our criteria for clinical significance. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the lowermost pinprick block level and the degree of motor block. Conclusions: Lumbar flexion has no clinically relevant effect on sensory spread during epidural anesthesia.

AB - Background and Objectives: This study examined the effect of lumbar flexion on the extent of the epidural block during lumbar epidural anesthesia. Methods: The epidural catheter was introduced at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the surgical side down. After administering a test drug (3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 15 μg of epinephrine), the patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: Group F (n = 16, lumbar spine flexed) and Group N (n = 17, lumbar spine in the neutral position). In both groups, 2% lidocaine (16 mL) mixed with sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was administered through the epidural catheter while the patient maintained the lateral decubitus position with the lumbar spine either flexed or in the neutral position. All the patients maintained their respective positions for 5 minutes and were subsequently turned to the supine position. The pinprick block level and the degree of motor blockade were assessed every 10 minutes for 60 minutes after administering the local anesthetics. A 2-dermatomal difference in uppermost block between groups was determined to be clinically significant. Results: The median difference between groups in the uppermost pinprick block level was only 1.5 dermatomes and it did not satisfy our criteria for clinical significance. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the lowermost pinprick block level and the degree of motor block. Conclusions: Lumbar flexion has no clinically relevant effect on sensory spread during epidural anesthesia.

KW - Anesthesia

KW - Epidural

KW - Lidocaine

KW - Lumbar flexion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36148957513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36148957513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.04.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 18035291

AN - SCOPUS:36148957513

VL - 32

SP - 471

EP - 474

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 1098-7339

IS - 6

ER -