Effect of seepage forces on tunnel face stability

In Mo Lee, Seok W. Nam, Jae H. Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, two factors are simultaneously considered for assessing tunnel face stability. The first is the effective stress acting on the tunnel face calculated by upper bound solution, and the other is the seepage force calculated by numerical analysis under the condition of steady-state groundwater flow. The seepage forces calculated by numerical analysis are compared with the results of a model test. The upper bound solution taking into consideration the seepage force acting on the tunnel face, shows that the minimum support pressure for the face stability is equal to the sum of the effective support pressure that is obtained from the upper bound solution based on effective stress and the seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face. It was found that the average seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face is proportional to the hydrostatic pressure at the same elevation, and the magnitude is about 22% of the hydrostatic pressure for the drainage type tunnel and about 28% for the waterproof type tunnel. The seepage forces obtained from the results of a model test showed similar trends as those calculated by numerical analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)342-350
Number of pages9
JournalCanadian Geotechnical Journal
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Seepage
seepage
Tunnels
tunnel
Numerical analysis
hydrostatic pressure
Hydrostatic pressure
effective stress
model test
Groundwater flow
effect
Drainage
groundwater flow
drainage
analysis

Keywords

  • Face stability
  • Model test
  • Seepage force
  • Upper bound solution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Effect of seepage forces on tunnel face stability. / Lee, In Mo; Nam, Seok W.; Ahn, Jae H.

In: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.04.2003, p. 342-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, In Mo ; Nam, Seok W. ; Ahn, Jae H. / Effect of seepage forces on tunnel face stability. In: Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 2003 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 342-350.
@article{6d374c2df2364c1ca3f454ca0c843aa9,
title = "Effect of seepage forces on tunnel face stability",
abstract = "In this study, two factors are simultaneously considered for assessing tunnel face stability. The first is the effective stress acting on the tunnel face calculated by upper bound solution, and the other is the seepage force calculated by numerical analysis under the condition of steady-state groundwater flow. The seepage forces calculated by numerical analysis are compared with the results of a model test. The upper bound solution taking into consideration the seepage force acting on the tunnel face, shows that the minimum support pressure for the face stability is equal to the sum of the effective support pressure that is obtained from the upper bound solution based on effective stress and the seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face. It was found that the average seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face is proportional to the hydrostatic pressure at the same elevation, and the magnitude is about 22{\%} of the hydrostatic pressure for the drainage type tunnel and about 28{\%} for the waterproof type tunnel. The seepage forces obtained from the results of a model test showed similar trends as those calculated by numerical analysis.",
keywords = "Face stability, Model test, Seepage force, Upper bound solution",
author = "Lee, {In Mo} and Nam, {Seok W.} and Ahn, {Jae H.}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1139/t02-120",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "342--350",
journal = "Canadian Geotechnical Journal",
issn = "0008-3674",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of seepage forces on tunnel face stability

AU - Lee, In Mo

AU - Nam, Seok W.

AU - Ahn, Jae H.

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - In this study, two factors are simultaneously considered for assessing tunnel face stability. The first is the effective stress acting on the tunnel face calculated by upper bound solution, and the other is the seepage force calculated by numerical analysis under the condition of steady-state groundwater flow. The seepage forces calculated by numerical analysis are compared with the results of a model test. The upper bound solution taking into consideration the seepage force acting on the tunnel face, shows that the minimum support pressure for the face stability is equal to the sum of the effective support pressure that is obtained from the upper bound solution based on effective stress and the seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face. It was found that the average seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face is proportional to the hydrostatic pressure at the same elevation, and the magnitude is about 22% of the hydrostatic pressure for the drainage type tunnel and about 28% for the waterproof type tunnel. The seepage forces obtained from the results of a model test showed similar trends as those calculated by numerical analysis.

AB - In this study, two factors are simultaneously considered for assessing tunnel face stability. The first is the effective stress acting on the tunnel face calculated by upper bound solution, and the other is the seepage force calculated by numerical analysis under the condition of steady-state groundwater flow. The seepage forces calculated by numerical analysis are compared with the results of a model test. The upper bound solution taking into consideration the seepage force acting on the tunnel face, shows that the minimum support pressure for the face stability is equal to the sum of the effective support pressure that is obtained from the upper bound solution based on effective stress and the seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face. It was found that the average seepage pressure acting on the tunnel face is proportional to the hydrostatic pressure at the same elevation, and the magnitude is about 22% of the hydrostatic pressure for the drainage type tunnel and about 28% for the waterproof type tunnel. The seepage forces obtained from the results of a model test showed similar trends as those calculated by numerical analysis.

KW - Face stability

KW - Model test

KW - Seepage force

KW - Upper bound solution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038419530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038419530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/t02-120

DO - 10.1139/t02-120

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 342

EP - 350

JO - Canadian Geotechnical Journal

JF - Canadian Geotechnical Journal

SN - 0008-3674

IS - 2

ER -