TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of threshold on the comparison of radar and rain gauge rain rate
AU - Ha, Eunho
AU - Yoo, Chulsang
AU - Yoon, Jungsoo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/2
Y1 - 2015/2
N2 - In this study, the effect of threshold applied to the radar rain rate on the comparison of the radar and rain gauge rain rate was theoretically examined. The result derived was also evaluated theoretically, using the Bernoulli random field, and empirically, using Gwanaksan Radar data. The results are summarized as follows. (1) In the application to the Bernoulli random field, it was found that the comparison of the radar and rain gauge rain rate with threshold does not introduce any systematic bias. (2) The same results could also be derived in the application to Gwanaksan Radar data. In all cases with several radar bin sizes and thresholds considered, the bias was estimated to be far less than 10% of the mean of the rain gauge rain rate. (3) However, in the comparison with threshold applied to both the radar and rain gauge rain rate, the bias was estimated to be higher than 20%. That is, the systematic bias was introduced. This result indicates that the comparison with threshold applied to both the radar and rain gauge rain rate should not be used.
AB - In this study, the effect of threshold applied to the radar rain rate on the comparison of the radar and rain gauge rain rate was theoretically examined. The result derived was also evaluated theoretically, using the Bernoulli random field, and empirically, using Gwanaksan Radar data. The results are summarized as follows. (1) In the application to the Bernoulli random field, it was found that the comparison of the radar and rain gauge rain rate with threshold does not introduce any systematic bias. (2) The same results could also be derived in the application to Gwanaksan Radar data. In all cases with several radar bin sizes and thresholds considered, the bias was estimated to be far less than 10% of the mean of the rain gauge rain rate. (3) However, in the comparison with threshold applied to both the radar and rain gauge rain rate, the bias was estimated to be higher than 20%. That is, the systematic bias was introduced. This result indicates that the comparison with threshold applied to both the radar and rain gauge rain rate should not be used.
KW - radar rain rate
KW - rain gauge rain rate
KW - systematic bias
KW - threshold
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921358450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921358450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12205-015-0482-1
DO - 10.1007/s12205-015-0482-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84921358450
SN - 1226-7988
VL - 19
SP - 392
EP - 400
JO - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
JF - KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
IS - 2
ER -