Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 726-729 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Implant Dentistry |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- divergence
- pick-up
- transfer
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oral Surgery
Cite this
Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions. / Shim, Ji Suk; Ryu, Jae Jun; Shin, Sang-Wan; Lee, Jeong Yol.
In: Implant Dentistry, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2015, p. 726-729.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions
AU - Shim, Ji Suk
AU - Ryu, Jae Jun
AU - Shin, Sang-Wan
AU - Lee, Jeong Yol
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.
AB - Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.
KW - divergence
KW - pick-up
KW - transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948719507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948719507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000336
DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000336
M3 - Article
C2 - 26384100
AN - SCOPUS:84948719507
VL - 24
SP - 726
EP - 729
JO - Implant Dentistry
JF - Implant Dentistry
SN - 1056-6163
IS - 6
ER -