Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions

Ji Suk Shim, Jae Jun Ryu, Sang-Wan Shin, Jeong Yol Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)726-729
Number of pages4
JournalImplant Dentistry
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Analysis of Variance
Theoretical Models
Metals

Keywords

  • divergence
  • pick-up
  • transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions. / Shim, Ji Suk; Ryu, Jae Jun; Shin, Sang-Wan; Lee, Jeong Yol.

In: Implant Dentistry, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2015, p. 726-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07a6df59d33e4ce9a548f922fa4aa737,
title = "Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions",
abstract = "Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.",
keywords = "divergence, pick-up, transfer",
author = "Shim, {Ji Suk} and Ryu, {Jae Jun} and Sang-Wan Shin and Lee, {Jeong Yol}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1097/ID.0000000000000336",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "726--729",
journal = "Implant Dentistry",
issn = "1056-6163",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions

AU - Shim, Ji Suk

AU - Ryu, Jae Jun

AU - Shin, Sang-Wan

AU - Lee, Jeong Yol

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.

AB - Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of impressions in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping. Materials and Methods: Three metal master models with 2 implants of 3 different angulations (parallel, mesiodistal, and buccolingual) were fabricated. Nine groups of experimental models were fabricated to duplicate the 3 master models using 3 types of impression copings: transfer, pick-up, and hybrid. The distance between the analogs for each model was measured using a video measuring system. The influence of angulation and type of impression coping was analyzed by a two-way ANOVA (P <0.05). Results: There were significant differences in error rates in relation to implant angulation and type of impression coping (P <0.05). Impressions of buccolingually divergent implants with transfer copings showed statistically higher error rates than other groups (P <0.05). Conclusions: Buccolingual divergence can be a variable that influences the impression accuracy of transfer copings compared with pick-up and hybrid copings. Hybrid copings demonstrate reasonable reproducibility similar to that of pick-up copings.

KW - divergence

KW - pick-up

KW - transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948719507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948719507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000336

DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000336

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 726

EP - 729

JO - Implant Dentistry

JF - Implant Dentistry

SN - 1056-6163

IS - 6

ER -