Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin glulisine (glulisine) with and without oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD; sulphonylurea or sulphonylurea + biguanide) relative to that of OAD alone in Japanese and Korean patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: In an open, randomized, parallel-group, comparative, controlled trial, 387 patients were randomized and treated with glulisine + OAD (n = 130), glulisine monotherapy (n = 127) or OAD only (n = 130) for 16 weeks. Glulisine was self-injected subcutaneously three times daily (0-15 minutes before meals) at a starting dose of ≥0.2 U/kg/day. Patients titrated the glulisine dose to achieve a 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (2h-PPG) level of 7.1-9.5 mmol/l (128-172 mg/dl) by administering at least one additional unit at each appropriate meal time if the 2h-PPG level was > 9.5 and < 11.1 mmol/l (> 172 and < 200 mg/dl) and by administering at least two additional units if the 2h-PPG level was ≥ 11.1 mmol/l (≥ 200 mg/dl). Therapy with OAD was continued at the stable baseline regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. Results: At baseline, therapy with OAD was a sulphonylurea only and a sulphonylurea + a biguanide in approximately 24 and 76% of patients respectively. Both glulisine groups had larger reductions in adjusted mean HbA1c than the OAD-only group (glulisine + OAD, -2.07%; glulisine monotherapy, -1.25%; OAD only, -0.61%). Superiority of glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy vs. OAD only was shown by differences in adjusted mean HbA1c change from baseline values of -1.46% (p < 0.0001) and -0.64% (p < 0.0001) respectively. Both glulisine groups had better 2h-PPG control than the OAD-only group. Mean daily glulisine doses increased from baseline to endpoint (glulisine + OAD, 13.3-22.5 U; glulisine monotherapy, 14.2-38.0 U). The rate of all symptomatic hypoglycaemia events per patient-year in the entire treatment phase was 11.9 in the glulisine + OAD group, 8.8 in the glulisine monotherapy group and 1.7 in the OAD-only group. There was only one event of severe hypoglycaemia, which occurred in the glulisine + OAD group. Efficacy and safety were similar in Japanese and Korean subpopulations. Conclusions: Both glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy were well tolerated and effective for Japanese and Korean patients with T2DM mellitus inadequately controlled by OAD therapy alone.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 900-909 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 Sep 2 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Glycated haemoglobin A
- Insulin glulisine
- Type 2 diabetes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Internal Medicine
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Endocrinology
Cite this
Effects of insulin glulisine as mono- or add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. / Kawamori, Ryuzo; Iwamoto, Y.; Kadowaki, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Kim, S. W.; Woo, J. T.; Baik, Sei-Hyun; Yoon, K. H.
In: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, Vol. 11, No. 9, 02.09.2009, p. 900-909.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of insulin glulisine as mono- or add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
AU - Kawamori, Ryuzo
AU - Iwamoto, Y.
AU - Kadowaki, T.
AU - Iwasaki, M.
AU - Kim, S. W.
AU - Woo, J. T.
AU - Baik, Sei-Hyun
AU - Yoon, K. H.
PY - 2009/9/2
Y1 - 2009/9/2
N2 - Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin glulisine (glulisine) with and without oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD; sulphonylurea or sulphonylurea + biguanide) relative to that of OAD alone in Japanese and Korean patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: In an open, randomized, parallel-group, comparative, controlled trial, 387 patients were randomized and treated with glulisine + OAD (n = 130), glulisine monotherapy (n = 127) or OAD only (n = 130) for 16 weeks. Glulisine was self-injected subcutaneously three times daily (0-15 minutes before meals) at a starting dose of ≥0.2 U/kg/day. Patients titrated the glulisine dose to achieve a 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (2h-PPG) level of 7.1-9.5 mmol/l (128-172 mg/dl) by administering at least one additional unit at each appropriate meal time if the 2h-PPG level was > 9.5 and < 11.1 mmol/l (> 172 and < 200 mg/dl) and by administering at least two additional units if the 2h-PPG level was ≥ 11.1 mmol/l (≥ 200 mg/dl). Therapy with OAD was continued at the stable baseline regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. Results: At baseline, therapy with OAD was a sulphonylurea only and a sulphonylurea + a biguanide in approximately 24 and 76% of patients respectively. Both glulisine groups had larger reductions in adjusted mean HbA1c than the OAD-only group (glulisine + OAD, -2.07%; glulisine monotherapy, -1.25%; OAD only, -0.61%). Superiority of glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy vs. OAD only was shown by differences in adjusted mean HbA1c change from baseline values of -1.46% (p < 0.0001) and -0.64% (p < 0.0001) respectively. Both glulisine groups had better 2h-PPG control than the OAD-only group. Mean daily glulisine doses increased from baseline to endpoint (glulisine + OAD, 13.3-22.5 U; glulisine monotherapy, 14.2-38.0 U). The rate of all symptomatic hypoglycaemia events per patient-year in the entire treatment phase was 11.9 in the glulisine + OAD group, 8.8 in the glulisine monotherapy group and 1.7 in the OAD-only group. There was only one event of severe hypoglycaemia, which occurred in the glulisine + OAD group. Efficacy and safety were similar in Japanese and Korean subpopulations. Conclusions: Both glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy were well tolerated and effective for Japanese and Korean patients with T2DM mellitus inadequately controlled by OAD therapy alone.
AB - Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin glulisine (glulisine) with and without oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD; sulphonylurea or sulphonylurea + biguanide) relative to that of OAD alone in Japanese and Korean patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: In an open, randomized, parallel-group, comparative, controlled trial, 387 patients were randomized and treated with glulisine + OAD (n = 130), glulisine monotherapy (n = 127) or OAD only (n = 130) for 16 weeks. Glulisine was self-injected subcutaneously three times daily (0-15 minutes before meals) at a starting dose of ≥0.2 U/kg/day. Patients titrated the glulisine dose to achieve a 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (2h-PPG) level of 7.1-9.5 mmol/l (128-172 mg/dl) by administering at least one additional unit at each appropriate meal time if the 2h-PPG level was > 9.5 and < 11.1 mmol/l (> 172 and < 200 mg/dl) and by administering at least two additional units if the 2h-PPG level was ≥ 11.1 mmol/l (≥ 200 mg/dl). Therapy with OAD was continued at the stable baseline regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint in the intention-to-treat population. Results: At baseline, therapy with OAD was a sulphonylurea only and a sulphonylurea + a biguanide in approximately 24 and 76% of patients respectively. Both glulisine groups had larger reductions in adjusted mean HbA1c than the OAD-only group (glulisine + OAD, -2.07%; glulisine monotherapy, -1.25%; OAD only, -0.61%). Superiority of glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy vs. OAD only was shown by differences in adjusted mean HbA1c change from baseline values of -1.46% (p < 0.0001) and -0.64% (p < 0.0001) respectively. Both glulisine groups had better 2h-PPG control than the OAD-only group. Mean daily glulisine doses increased from baseline to endpoint (glulisine + OAD, 13.3-22.5 U; glulisine monotherapy, 14.2-38.0 U). The rate of all symptomatic hypoglycaemia events per patient-year in the entire treatment phase was 11.9 in the glulisine + OAD group, 8.8 in the glulisine monotherapy group and 1.7 in the OAD-only group. There was only one event of severe hypoglycaemia, which occurred in the glulisine + OAD group. Efficacy and safety were similar in Japanese and Korean subpopulations. Conclusions: Both glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy were well tolerated and effective for Japanese and Korean patients with T2DM mellitus inadequately controlled by OAD therapy alone.
KW - Glycated haemoglobin A
KW - Insulin glulisine
KW - Type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249215409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249215409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01088.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01088.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19614946
AN - SCOPUS:69249215409
VL - 11
SP - 900
EP - 909
JO - Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
JF - Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
SN - 1462-8902
IS - 9
ER -