Effects of visual stimulus characteristics and individual differences in heading estimation

Ksander N. de Winkel, Max Kurtz, Heinrich Bulthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Visual heading estimation is subject to periodic patterns of constant (bias) and variable (noise) error. The nature of the errors, however, appears to differ between studies, showing underestimation in some, but overestimation in others. We investigated whether field of view (FOV), the availability of binocular disparity cues, motion profile, and visual scene layout can account for error characteristics, with a potential mediating effect of vection. Twenty participants (12 females) reported heading and rated vection for visual horizontal motion stimuli with headings ranging the full circle, while we systematically varied the above factors. Overall, the results show constant errors away from the fore-aft axis. Error magnitude was affected by FOV, disparity, and scene layout. Variable errors varied with heading angle, and depended on scene layout. Higher vection ratings were associated with smaller variable errors. Vection ratings depended on FOV, motion profile, and scene layout, with the highest ratings for a large FOV, cosine-bell velocity profile, and a ground plane scene rather than a dot cloud scene. Although the factors did affect error magnitude, differences in its direction were observed only between participants. We show that the observations are consistent with prior beliefs that headings align with the cardinal axes, where the attraction of each axis is an idiosyncratic property.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Individuality
Vision Disparity
Cues
Noise
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Effects of visual stimulus characteristics and individual differences in heading estimation. / de Winkel, Ksander N.; Kurtz, Max; Bulthoff, Heinrich.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 18, No. 11, 01.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{265f5a4ac515448f831ebe71461b51cd,
title = "Effects of visual stimulus characteristics and individual differences in heading estimation",
abstract = "Visual heading estimation is subject to periodic patterns of constant (bias) and variable (noise) error. The nature of the errors, however, appears to differ between studies, showing underestimation in some, but overestimation in others. We investigated whether field of view (FOV), the availability of binocular disparity cues, motion profile, and visual scene layout can account for error characteristics, with a potential mediating effect of vection. Twenty participants (12 females) reported heading and rated vection for visual horizontal motion stimuli with headings ranging the full circle, while we systematically varied the above factors. Overall, the results show constant errors away from the fore-aft axis. Error magnitude was affected by FOV, disparity, and scene layout. Variable errors varied with heading angle, and depended on scene layout. Higher vection ratings were associated with smaller variable errors. Vection ratings depended on FOV, motion profile, and scene layout, with the highest ratings for a large FOV, cosine-bell velocity profile, and a ground plane scene rather than a dot cloud scene. Although the factors did affect error magnitude, differences in its direction were observed only between participants. We show that the observations are consistent with prior beliefs that headings align with the cardinal axes, where the attraction of each axis is an idiosyncratic property.",
author = "{de Winkel}, {Ksander N.} and Max Kurtz and Heinrich Bulthoff",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/18.11.9",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of visual stimulus characteristics and individual differences in heading estimation

AU - de Winkel, Ksander N.

AU - Kurtz, Max

AU - Bulthoff, Heinrich

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Visual heading estimation is subject to periodic patterns of constant (bias) and variable (noise) error. The nature of the errors, however, appears to differ between studies, showing underestimation in some, but overestimation in others. We investigated whether field of view (FOV), the availability of binocular disparity cues, motion profile, and visual scene layout can account for error characteristics, with a potential mediating effect of vection. Twenty participants (12 females) reported heading and rated vection for visual horizontal motion stimuli with headings ranging the full circle, while we systematically varied the above factors. Overall, the results show constant errors away from the fore-aft axis. Error magnitude was affected by FOV, disparity, and scene layout. Variable errors varied with heading angle, and depended on scene layout. Higher vection ratings were associated with smaller variable errors. Vection ratings depended on FOV, motion profile, and scene layout, with the highest ratings for a large FOV, cosine-bell velocity profile, and a ground plane scene rather than a dot cloud scene. Although the factors did affect error magnitude, differences in its direction were observed only between participants. We show that the observations are consistent with prior beliefs that headings align with the cardinal axes, where the attraction of each axis is an idiosyncratic property.

AB - Visual heading estimation is subject to periodic patterns of constant (bias) and variable (noise) error. The nature of the errors, however, appears to differ between studies, showing underestimation in some, but overestimation in others. We investigated whether field of view (FOV), the availability of binocular disparity cues, motion profile, and visual scene layout can account for error characteristics, with a potential mediating effect of vection. Twenty participants (12 females) reported heading and rated vection for visual horizontal motion stimuli with headings ranging the full circle, while we systematically varied the above factors. Overall, the results show constant errors away from the fore-aft axis. Error magnitude was affected by FOV, disparity, and scene layout. Variable errors varied with heading angle, and depended on scene layout. Higher vection ratings were associated with smaller variable errors. Vection ratings depended on FOV, motion profile, and scene layout, with the highest ratings for a large FOV, cosine-bell velocity profile, and a ground plane scene rather than a dot cloud scene. Although the factors did affect error magnitude, differences in its direction were observed only between participants. We show that the observations are consistent with prior beliefs that headings align with the cardinal axes, where the attraction of each axis is an idiosyncratic property.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055168548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055168548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/18.11.9

DO - 10.1167/18.11.9

M3 - Article

C2 - 30347100

AN - SCOPUS:85055168548

VL - 18

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 11

ER -