Efficacy and patient satisfaction regarding lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis for extremity lymphedema

Jae Ho Chung, Si Ook Baek, Ho Jin Park, Byung-Il Lee, Seung Ha Park, Eul Sik Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background When performing lymphovenous anastomosis, it is sometimes difficult to find venules in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel that have a similar diameter to that of the lymphatic vessel. In this situation, larger venules can be used. Methods The authors evaluated the efficacy of and patient satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis. Between January 2014 and December 2016, we performed this procedure in 18 patients (eight upper extremities and 10 lower extremities) with secondary lymphedema. Lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis was performed under microscopy after injecting indocyanine green dye. The circumferential diameter was measured before lymphovenous bypass and at 1, 2, and 6 months after the procedure. An outcomes survey that included patients’ qualitative satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass was conducted at 6 months postoperatively. Results Almost all patients showed quantitative improvements after surgery. The circumferential reduction rate in patients with stage II lymphedema of both the upper and lower extremities was significantly greater than in their counterparts with stage III/IV lymphedema. The circumferential reduction rate was lower in lower-extremity patients than in upper-ex-tremity patients. Conclusions Lymphovenous bypass surgery with sleeve-in anastomosis in lymphedema patients is beneficial, and appears to be effective, when adequately-sized venules cannot be found in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-56
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Plastic Surgery
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Patient Satisfaction
Extremities
Lymphatic Vessels
Venules
Lower Extremity
Indocyanine Green
Upper Extremity
Microscopy
Coloring Agents

Keywords

  • Lower extremity
  • Lymphedema
  • Microsurgery
  • Upper extremity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Efficacy and patient satisfaction regarding lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis for extremity lymphedema. / Chung, Jae Ho; Baek, Si Ook; Park, Ho Jin; Lee, Byung-Il; Park, Seung Ha; Yoon, Eul Sik.

In: Archives of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 46-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{045a739bb3c9435985454869abd4181b,
title = "Efficacy and patient satisfaction regarding lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis for extremity lymphedema",
abstract = "Background When performing lymphovenous anastomosis, it is sometimes difficult to find venules in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel that have a similar diameter to that of the lymphatic vessel. In this situation, larger venules can be used. Methods The authors evaluated the efficacy of and patient satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis. Between January 2014 and December 2016, we performed this procedure in 18 patients (eight upper extremities and 10 lower extremities) with secondary lymphedema. Lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis was performed under microscopy after injecting indocyanine green dye. The circumferential diameter was measured before lymphovenous bypass and at 1, 2, and 6 months after the procedure. An outcomes survey that included patients’ qualitative satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass was conducted at 6 months postoperatively. Results Almost all patients showed quantitative improvements after surgery. The circumferential reduction rate in patients with stage II lymphedema of both the upper and lower extremities was significantly greater than in their counterparts with stage III/IV lymphedema. The circumferential reduction rate was lower in lower-extremity patients than in upper-ex-tremity patients. Conclusions Lymphovenous bypass surgery with sleeve-in anastomosis in lymphedema patients is beneficial, and appears to be effective, when adequately-sized venules cannot be found in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel.",
keywords = "Lower extremity, Lymphedema, Microsurgery, Upper extremity",
author = "Chung, {Jae Ho} and Baek, {Si Ook} and Park, {Ho Jin} and Byung-Il Lee and Park, {Seung Ha} and Yoon, {Eul Sik}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5999/aps.2018.00773",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "46--56",
journal = "Archives of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2234-6163",
publisher = "Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy and patient satisfaction regarding lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis for extremity lymphedema

AU - Chung, Jae Ho

AU - Baek, Si Ook

AU - Park, Ho Jin

AU - Lee, Byung-Il

AU - Park, Seung Ha

AU - Yoon, Eul Sik

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background When performing lymphovenous anastomosis, it is sometimes difficult to find venules in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel that have a similar diameter to that of the lymphatic vessel. In this situation, larger venules can be used. Methods The authors evaluated the efficacy of and patient satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis. Between January 2014 and December 2016, we performed this procedure in 18 patients (eight upper extremities and 10 lower extremities) with secondary lymphedema. Lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis was performed under microscopy after injecting indocyanine green dye. The circumferential diameter was measured before lymphovenous bypass and at 1, 2, and 6 months after the procedure. An outcomes survey that included patients’ qualitative satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass was conducted at 6 months postoperatively. Results Almost all patients showed quantitative improvements after surgery. The circumferential reduction rate in patients with stage II lymphedema of both the upper and lower extremities was significantly greater than in their counterparts with stage III/IV lymphedema. The circumferential reduction rate was lower in lower-extremity patients than in upper-ex-tremity patients. Conclusions Lymphovenous bypass surgery with sleeve-in anastomosis in lymphedema patients is beneficial, and appears to be effective, when adequately-sized venules cannot be found in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel.

AB - Background When performing lymphovenous anastomosis, it is sometimes difficult to find venules in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel that have a similar diameter to that of the lymphatic vessel. In this situation, larger venules can be used. Methods The authors evaluated the efficacy of and patient satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis. Between January 2014 and December 2016, we performed this procedure in 18 patients (eight upper extremities and 10 lower extremities) with secondary lymphedema. Lymphovenous bypass with sleeve-in anastomosis was performed under microscopy after injecting indocyanine green dye. The circumferential diameter was measured before lymphovenous bypass and at 1, 2, and 6 months after the procedure. An outcomes survey that included patients’ qualitative satisfaction with lymphovenous bypass was conducted at 6 months postoperatively. Results Almost all patients showed quantitative improvements after surgery. The circumferential reduction rate in patients with stage II lymphedema of both the upper and lower extremities was significantly greater than in their counterparts with stage III/IV lymphedema. The circumferential reduction rate was lower in lower-extremity patients than in upper-ex-tremity patients. Conclusions Lymphovenous bypass surgery with sleeve-in anastomosis in lymphedema patients is beneficial, and appears to be effective, when adequately-sized venules cannot be found in the proximity of an ideal lymphatic vessel.

KW - Lower extremity

KW - Lymphedema

KW - Microsurgery

KW - Upper extremity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060875283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060875283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5999/aps.2018.00773

DO - 10.5999/aps.2018.00773

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 46

EP - 56

JO - Archives of Plastic Surgery

JF - Archives of Plastic Surgery

SN - 2234-6163

IS - 1

ER -