Efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting for dental implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Kyoung In Yun, Hyungkil Choi, Robert F. Wright, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Brian M. Chang, Hyun Jung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, and implant survival and success rates and investigate the relationship between bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was done using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed from inception to April 30, 2014. Supplementary manual searches of published full-text articles were also performed. Results: Searches of four electronic databases and manual searches resulted in 1,538 articles. After selection, four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The difference in bone gain at the end of distraction or bone grafting was statistically significant (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.86, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.69, P = .05; heterogeneity: I2 = 78%, P = .01). However, there was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting (WMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.99 to 1.59, P = .065). Bone resorption between the end of treatment and the time of implant placement was not statistically significant (WMD -0.12, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.85, P = .80; heterogeneity: I2 = 78%, P = .01). A simple equation related to bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction was induced from these results. Conclusion: There was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting in terms of bone gain and bone resorption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-36
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Distraction Osteogenesis
Dental Implants
Bone Transplantation
Bone Resorption
Meta-Analysis
Inlays
Bone and Bones
MEDLINE
Libraries
Databases

Keywords

  • Alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis
  • Autogenous bone graft
  • Bone gain
  • Bone resorption
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting for dental implants : Systematic review and meta-analysis. / Yun, Kyoung In; Choi, Hyungkil; Wright, Robert F.; Ahn, Hyeong Sik; Chang, Brian M.; Kim, Hyun Jung.

In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 26-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6bce85bea4f44bc9417d765a4fe33ea,
title = "Efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting for dental implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, and implant survival and success rates and investigate the relationship between bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was done using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed from inception to April 30, 2014. Supplementary manual searches of published full-text articles were also performed. Results: Searches of four electronic databases and manual searches resulted in 1,538 articles. After selection, four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The difference in bone gain at the end of distraction or bone grafting was statistically significant (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.86, 95{\%} CI 0.03 to 3.69, P = .05; heterogeneity: I2 = 78{\%}, P = .01). However, there was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting (WMD 0.30, 95{\%} CI -0.99 to 1.59, P = .065). Bone resorption between the end of treatment and the time of implant placement was not statistically significant (WMD -0.12, 95{\%} CI -1.10 to 0.85, P = .80; heterogeneity: I2 = 78{\%}, P = .01). A simple equation related to bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction was induced from these results. Conclusion: There was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting in terms of bone gain and bone resorption.",
keywords = "Alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis, Autogenous bone graft, Bone gain, Bone resorption, Meta-analysis",
author = "Yun, {Kyoung In} and Hyungkil Choi and Wright, {Robert F.} and Ahn, {Hyeong Sik} and Chang, {Brian M.} and Kim, {Hyun Jung}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11607/jomi.4479",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "26--36",
journal = "International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants",
issn = "0882-2786",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting for dental implants

T2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Yun, Kyoung In

AU - Choi, Hyungkil

AU - Wright, Robert F.

AU - Ahn, Hyeong Sik

AU - Chang, Brian M.

AU - Kim, Hyun Jung

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, and implant survival and success rates and investigate the relationship between bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was done using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed from inception to April 30, 2014. Supplementary manual searches of published full-text articles were also performed. Results: Searches of four electronic databases and manual searches resulted in 1,538 articles. After selection, four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The difference in bone gain at the end of distraction or bone grafting was statistically significant (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.86, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.69, P = .05; heterogeneity: I2 = 78%, P = .01). However, there was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting (WMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.99 to 1.59, P = .065). Bone resorption between the end of treatment and the time of implant placement was not statistically significant (WMD -0.12, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.85, P = .80; heterogeneity: I2 = 78%, P = .01). A simple equation related to bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction was induced from these results. Conclusion: There was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting in terms of bone gain and bone resorption.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, and implant survival and success rates and investigate the relationship between bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was done using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed from inception to April 30, 2014. Supplementary manual searches of published full-text articles were also performed. Results: Searches of four electronic databases and manual searches resulted in 1,538 articles. After selection, four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The difference in bone gain at the end of distraction or bone grafting was statistically significant (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.86, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.69, P = .05; heterogeneity: I2 = 78%, P = .01). However, there was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting (WMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.99 to 1.59, P = .065). Bone resorption between the end of treatment and the time of implant placement was not statistically significant (WMD -0.12, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.85, P = .80; heterogeneity: I2 = 78%, P = .01). A simple equation related to bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction was induced from these results. Conclusion: There was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting in terms of bone gain and bone resorption.

KW - Alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis

KW - Autogenous bone graft

KW - Bone gain

KW - Bone resorption

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983050285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983050285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11607/jomi.4479

DO - 10.11607/jomi.4479

M3 - Article

C2 - 26800160

AN - SCOPUS:84983050285

VL - 31

SP - 26

EP - 36

JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

SN - 0882-2786

IS - 1

ER -