Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions

Byoung Kwon Lee, Hyun Hee Choi, Kyung Soon Hong, Byoung Keuk Kim, Jaemin Shim, Jung Sun Kim, Young Guk Ko, Donghoon Choi, Yangsoo Jang, Myeong Ki Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been frequently used to optimize the results of coronary stenting in patients with significant narrowing of coronary arteries. Hypothesis: There has been a consensus that an FFR value >0.90 after stenting is a useful surrogate for favorable long-termclinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of FFR measurement at side branch vessels of true coronary bifurcation lesions that were treatedwith the crush stenting technique. Methods: This study included 12 patients with significant narrowing in both a main coronary vessel and side branch vessel who underwent the crush stenting procedure. Results: After crush stenting, FFR measurement was performed at the side branch vessel prior to and after kissing balloon angioplasty (KBA). FFR values increased significantly, from 0.94 ± 0.04 pre-KBA to 0.97 ± 0.03 post-KBA (P = 0.011). FFR values after crush stenting but prior to KBA alreadymeasured >0.90 in 9 of the 12 patients (75%). FFR values for the remaining 3 patientswere 0.88, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. Conclusions: FFR measurement at side branch vessels of coronary bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting may not contribute to adequate decision-making for improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. KBA should be strongly considered for patients with bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)490-494
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Aug 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Balloon Angioplasty
Coronary Vessels
Consensus
Decision Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions. / Lee, Byoung Kwon; Choi, Hyun Hee; Hong, Kyung Soon; Kim, Byoung Keuk; Shim, Jaemin; Kim, Jung Sun; Ko, Young Guk; Choi, Donghoon; Jang, Yangsoo; Hong, Myeong Ki.

In: Clinical Cardiology, Vol. 33, No. 8, 01.08.2010, p. 490-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Byoung Kwon ; Choi, Hyun Hee ; Hong, Kyung Soon ; Kim, Byoung Keuk ; Shim, Jaemin ; Kim, Jung Sun ; Ko, Young Guk ; Choi, Donghoon ; Jang, Yangsoo ; Hong, Myeong Ki. / Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions. In: Clinical Cardiology. 2010 ; Vol. 33, No. 8. pp. 490-494.
@article{d05eba0ece9a46b3ba588aa76bd42a16,
title = "Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions",
abstract = "Background: Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been frequently used to optimize the results of coronary stenting in patients with significant narrowing of coronary arteries. Hypothesis: There has been a consensus that an FFR value >0.90 after stenting is a useful surrogate for favorable long-termclinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of FFR measurement at side branch vessels of true coronary bifurcation lesions that were treatedwith the crush stenting technique. Methods: This study included 12 patients with significant narrowing in both a main coronary vessel and side branch vessel who underwent the crush stenting procedure. Results: After crush stenting, FFR measurement was performed at the side branch vessel prior to and after kissing balloon angioplasty (KBA). FFR values increased significantly, from 0.94 ± 0.04 pre-KBA to 0.97 ± 0.03 post-KBA (P = 0.011). FFR values after crush stenting but prior to KBA alreadymeasured >0.90 in 9 of the 12 patients (75{\%}). FFR values for the remaining 3 patientswere 0.88, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. Conclusions: FFR measurement at side branch vessels of coronary bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting may not contribute to adequate decision-making for improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. KBA should be strongly considered for patients with bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting.",
author = "Lee, {Byoung Kwon} and Choi, {Hyun Hee} and Hong, {Kyung Soon} and Kim, {Byoung Keuk} and Jaemin Shim and Kim, {Jung Sun} and Ko, {Young Guk} and Donghoon Choi and Yangsoo Jang and Hong, {Myeong Ki}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/clc.20799",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "490--494",
journal = "Clinical Cardiology",
issn = "0160-9289",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions

AU - Lee, Byoung Kwon

AU - Choi, Hyun Hee

AU - Hong, Kyung Soon

AU - Kim, Byoung Keuk

AU - Shim, Jaemin

AU - Kim, Jung Sun

AU - Ko, Young Guk

AU - Choi, Donghoon

AU - Jang, Yangsoo

AU - Hong, Myeong Ki

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Background: Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been frequently used to optimize the results of coronary stenting in patients with significant narrowing of coronary arteries. Hypothesis: There has been a consensus that an FFR value >0.90 after stenting is a useful surrogate for favorable long-termclinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of FFR measurement at side branch vessels of true coronary bifurcation lesions that were treatedwith the crush stenting technique. Methods: This study included 12 patients with significant narrowing in both a main coronary vessel and side branch vessel who underwent the crush stenting procedure. Results: After crush stenting, FFR measurement was performed at the side branch vessel prior to and after kissing balloon angioplasty (KBA). FFR values increased significantly, from 0.94 ± 0.04 pre-KBA to 0.97 ± 0.03 post-KBA (P = 0.011). FFR values after crush stenting but prior to KBA alreadymeasured >0.90 in 9 of the 12 patients (75%). FFR values for the remaining 3 patientswere 0.88, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. Conclusions: FFR measurement at side branch vessels of coronary bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting may not contribute to adequate decision-making for improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. KBA should be strongly considered for patients with bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting.

AB - Background: Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been frequently used to optimize the results of coronary stenting in patients with significant narrowing of coronary arteries. Hypothesis: There has been a consensus that an FFR value >0.90 after stenting is a useful surrogate for favorable long-termclinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of FFR measurement at side branch vessels of true coronary bifurcation lesions that were treatedwith the crush stenting technique. Methods: This study included 12 patients with significant narrowing in both a main coronary vessel and side branch vessel who underwent the crush stenting procedure. Results: After crush stenting, FFR measurement was performed at the side branch vessel prior to and after kissing balloon angioplasty (KBA). FFR values increased significantly, from 0.94 ± 0.04 pre-KBA to 0.97 ± 0.03 post-KBA (P = 0.011). FFR values after crush stenting but prior to KBA alreadymeasured >0.90 in 9 of the 12 patients (75%). FFR values for the remaining 3 patientswere 0.88, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively. Conclusions: FFR measurement at side branch vessels of coronary bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting may not contribute to adequate decision-making for improvement of long-term clinical outcomes. KBA should be strongly considered for patients with bifurcation lesions treated with crush stenting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956004086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956004086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/clc.20799

DO - 10.1002/clc.20799

M3 - Article

C2 - 20734446

AN - SCOPUS:77956004086

VL - 33

SP - 490

EP - 494

JO - Clinical Cardiology

JF - Clinical Cardiology

SN - 0160-9289

IS - 8

ER -