Efficacy of the modified STING procedure for the treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux

Tae Won Lee, Mi-Mi Oh, Myeong Heon Jin, Du Geon Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The modified subureteral transurethral injection (STING) has been reported to increase the success of endoscopic treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study was performed to assess the efficacy of the modified STING procedure compared to conventional STING in the setting of high grade VUR. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 consecutive children (46 ureters) with a median age of 5.32 years (range 1 to 10 years) who underwent endoscopic treatment of grade IV to grade V VUR between February 2004 and December 2006. The modified STING was performed by applying a direct pressure stream of irrigation fluid into the ureter in order to define the injection site within the ureteral submucosa. The needle was then placed in the ureteral tunnel, and a dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) was injected into the submucosal intraureteral space, tracking along the entire length of the detrusor tunnel. Modified STING was performed in 27 ureters (grade IV: 13, grade V: 14), and conventional STING was performed in 19 ureters (grade IV: 12, grade V: 7). Follow-up voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was performed 3 months later. Results: Complete resolution occurred in 82% (22/27 ureters) of the patients undergoing modified STING, including 92% (12/13) of grade IV patients and 71% (10/14) of grade V patients. Three ureters required a second injection to correct VUR. Conventional STING had a success rate of 63% (12/19), [75% (9/12) in grade IV and 43% (3/7) in grade V]. The mean injected volume for the modified STING was 1.23±0.3ml, while that for the conventional STING was 0.95±0.2ml (p=0.03). Conclusions: The modified STING was markedly more successful in the treatment of high grade VUR and carried no significant adverse effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1024-1028
Number of pages5
JournalKorean Journal of Urology
Volume49
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
Ureter
Injections
Therapeutics
Needles
Medical Records
Pressure

Keywords

  • Efficacy
  • Endoscopic treatment
  • Modified technique
  • Vesico-ureteral reflux

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Efficacy of the modified STING procedure for the treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux. / Lee, Tae Won; Oh, Mi-Mi; Jin, Myeong Heon; Moon, Du Geon.

In: Korean Journal of Urology, Vol. 49, No. 11, 01.11.2008, p. 1024-1028.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2882ea3c3e9946ee85ba34e5bf7ceec4,
title = "Efficacy of the modified STING procedure for the treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux",
abstract = "Purpose: The modified subureteral transurethral injection (STING) has been reported to increase the success of endoscopic treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study was performed to assess the efficacy of the modified STING procedure compared to conventional STING in the setting of high grade VUR. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 consecutive children (46 ureters) with a median age of 5.32 years (range 1 to 10 years) who underwent endoscopic treatment of grade IV to grade V VUR between February 2004 and December 2006. The modified STING was performed by applying a direct pressure stream of irrigation fluid into the ureter in order to define the injection site within the ureteral submucosa. The needle was then placed in the ureteral tunnel, and a dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) was injected into the submucosal intraureteral space, tracking along the entire length of the detrusor tunnel. Modified STING was performed in 27 ureters (grade IV: 13, grade V: 14), and conventional STING was performed in 19 ureters (grade IV: 12, grade V: 7). Follow-up voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was performed 3 months later. Results: Complete resolution occurred in 82{\%} (22/27 ureters) of the patients undergoing modified STING, including 92{\%} (12/13) of grade IV patients and 71{\%} (10/14) of grade V patients. Three ureters required a second injection to correct VUR. Conventional STING had a success rate of 63{\%} (12/19), [75{\%} (9/12) in grade IV and 43{\%} (3/7) in grade V]. The mean injected volume for the modified STING was 1.23±0.3ml, while that for the conventional STING was 0.95±0.2ml (p=0.03). Conclusions: The modified STING was markedly more successful in the treatment of high grade VUR and carried no significant adverse effects.",
keywords = "Efficacy, Endoscopic treatment, Modified technique, Vesico-ureteral reflux",
author = "Lee, {Tae Won} and Mi-Mi Oh and Jin, {Myeong Heon} and Moon, {Du Geon}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4111/kju.2008.49.11.1024",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1024--1028",
journal = "Korean Journal of Urology",
issn = "2005-6737",
publisher = "Korean Urological Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of the modified STING procedure for the treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux

AU - Lee, Tae Won

AU - Oh, Mi-Mi

AU - Jin, Myeong Heon

AU - Moon, Du Geon

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The modified subureteral transurethral injection (STING) has been reported to increase the success of endoscopic treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study was performed to assess the efficacy of the modified STING procedure compared to conventional STING in the setting of high grade VUR. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 consecutive children (46 ureters) with a median age of 5.32 years (range 1 to 10 years) who underwent endoscopic treatment of grade IV to grade V VUR between February 2004 and December 2006. The modified STING was performed by applying a direct pressure stream of irrigation fluid into the ureter in order to define the injection site within the ureteral submucosa. The needle was then placed in the ureteral tunnel, and a dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) was injected into the submucosal intraureteral space, tracking along the entire length of the detrusor tunnel. Modified STING was performed in 27 ureters (grade IV: 13, grade V: 14), and conventional STING was performed in 19 ureters (grade IV: 12, grade V: 7). Follow-up voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was performed 3 months later. Results: Complete resolution occurred in 82% (22/27 ureters) of the patients undergoing modified STING, including 92% (12/13) of grade IV patients and 71% (10/14) of grade V patients. Three ureters required a second injection to correct VUR. Conventional STING had a success rate of 63% (12/19), [75% (9/12) in grade IV and 43% (3/7) in grade V]. The mean injected volume for the modified STING was 1.23±0.3ml, while that for the conventional STING was 0.95±0.2ml (p=0.03). Conclusions: The modified STING was markedly more successful in the treatment of high grade VUR and carried no significant adverse effects.

AB - Purpose: The modified subureteral transurethral injection (STING) has been reported to increase the success of endoscopic treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study was performed to assess the efficacy of the modified STING procedure compared to conventional STING in the setting of high grade VUR. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 consecutive children (46 ureters) with a median age of 5.32 years (range 1 to 10 years) who underwent endoscopic treatment of grade IV to grade V VUR between February 2004 and December 2006. The modified STING was performed by applying a direct pressure stream of irrigation fluid into the ureter in order to define the injection site within the ureteral submucosa. The needle was then placed in the ureteral tunnel, and a dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) was injected into the submucosal intraureteral space, tracking along the entire length of the detrusor tunnel. Modified STING was performed in 27 ureters (grade IV: 13, grade V: 14), and conventional STING was performed in 19 ureters (grade IV: 12, grade V: 7). Follow-up voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was performed 3 months later. Results: Complete resolution occurred in 82% (22/27 ureters) of the patients undergoing modified STING, including 92% (12/13) of grade IV patients and 71% (10/14) of grade V patients. Three ureters required a second injection to correct VUR. Conventional STING had a success rate of 63% (12/19), [75% (9/12) in grade IV and 43% (3/7) in grade V]. The mean injected volume for the modified STING was 1.23±0.3ml, while that for the conventional STING was 0.95±0.2ml (p=0.03). Conclusions: The modified STING was markedly more successful in the treatment of high grade VUR and carried no significant adverse effects.

KW - Efficacy

KW - Endoscopic treatment

KW - Modified technique

KW - Vesico-ureteral reflux

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049104047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049104047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4111/kju.2008.49.11.1024

DO - 10.4111/kju.2008.49.11.1024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57049104047

VL - 49

SP - 1024

EP - 1028

JO - Korean Journal of Urology

JF - Korean Journal of Urology

SN - 2005-6737

IS - 11

ER -